16-year old girl claims former president bill clinton is her father

Newt Gingrich is a dirtier old man, and he was the GOP party leader for a long time, and close presidential candidate in the last election.

 

Uh yeah he lied under oath, that was the issue and that onus was all on him. The rest of us would have preferred he act like a President instead of diddling his interns and anything else that was breathing. If he didn't respect his own wife then there was no expectation that he would respect the citizens. It comes down to what type of man you are. Some of us treat our wives with respect and other treat them like dirt like Bill Clinton did to Hillary.

 

Thomas Jefferson ****ed his own underage slave, and there is a major heart on for him in connie land, yanno, bubbas

 

I suggest you reread the OP. This thread is not about the Paula Jones deposition or any perjury therein. This is about a satiric ( fictional) piece presupposing a different affair which produced child . Clearly he did not asked about this matter in a deposition, so it would be none of our business absent criminal conduct. It is his wife's business and possibly a 16 year old seeking a support order secondary to a finding of paternity.

Geez, how many times do I have make this point. Maybe someone should pay some attention to what I am actually talking about and ask me about the Lewinsky affair if that is what you want to discuss.

 

The good news for the Clinton boot lickers is that this story is made up.

The bad news is the rest of them aren't.

 

this is ludicrous.... the child was most likely fathered by Hillary.

 

Hmmmm . . . well although she is certainly manly enough in demeanor to qualify (in theory that is) and while it's rumored that she's respected -- or perhaps feared -- in the bedroom because of her reputed Great Dildo of Power (the REAL GDP) I really don't think that procreation works that way . . . in practical application; not even when Queen Hillary is involved.

 

The girl does have Bill's eyebrows.

The way I look at it, any man's wife who refuses to engage in coitus or is incapable to get her husband to shoot his wad, the husband under the "Law of Nature" can play around.

 

Yeah already read everything and was responding to your post which you made remarks about his oath of office and his wife. I felt the need to remind you his extra marital affairs didnt concern us until he lied under oath. After that its my opinion that a man who doesnt care about his own wife certainly doesnt care about the rest of us and only cares about his own selfish needs.

 

Actually, I think they're defending her husband.

 

I suspect she has balls bigger and harder than all of us

 

I can't argue with that. All kidding aside, though, although I won't vote for her if she runs this time I do suspect that she would have been a quite competent president had she won the primaries and then gone on to defeat McCain back in 2008. I simply cannot believe that she would have been as bad as, or worse than, Barack. But . . . I could be wrong.

 

I don't trust Hillary one bit. I don't know if she would have been a more effective president than Mr. Obama. I just think about all the scandals she has been involved in and the lies she has told, and I don't see how anyone can trust a person like that to run the country.

I feel the thing that is most bringing our country down is the democrat/republican monopolizing our government. We need to get some more valid 3rd party candidates, and I think it would be a great idea to limit campaign funds so that there is an even playing field. Let's face it, no other candidates can match the PAC contributions of the two major parties. They monopolize everything to do with elections. Neither of these two parties have the country's best interests at heart. They put party before country, as do their followers.

 

Clinton may not be a faithful husband, but the economy was great when he was President.... I will take 8 more years... thanks

Hillary was a die hard republicans when she was younger, but I think having Bill in the WH too will equal that out

.

 

I'm not sure it was his merit but the economy raised great indeed.
If the next POTUS will be republican according to the leapfrog scheme then we'll hardly see some economy growth in this decade.

 

He was held in contempt of court for it and plea bargained admitting it to the criminal charge. He submitted a false affidavit, do you know what that is in a court of law?

- - - Updated - - -

The point being, it is believable. You aren't so dumb as to not realize that are you?

 

How so, he had two marriages fall apart and he married someone else he fell in love with. How does that make him dirtier than someone who sexually assaults subordinate workers and crams cigars up the vigina's on federal interns in the Oval Office?

- - - Updated - - -

No thanks to him but are you on record now as saying that if a boss sexually harasses and assaults subordinate workers but the company is doing great then it's OK?

 

If it was with a federal/state employee it would specifically be our business as was the Jones, a state employee while he was governor, and Lewinsky a federal employee.

 

Monica says it was consensual... it was not sexual harassment, nice try though

 

QUOTE=Bluesguy;1064845302]He was held in contempt of court for it and plea bargained admitting it to the criminal charge. He submitted a false affidavit, do you know what that is in a court of law?




THIS OP OF THIS THREAD IS NOT ABOUT SEX WITH FLOWERS , JONES OR LEWINSKI SO PRIOR 'BAD ACTS' ASSOCIATED WITH THEM ARE MOOT. THIS GIRL IS NOT ASSERTING CLINTON DID SOMETHING ILLEGAL OR LIED ABOUT IT UNDER OATH SO IT IS NONE OF OUR BUSINESS, PENDING A CHARGE OF CRIMINAL CONDUCT.

Did the caps help? Please realize that I know and understand the legal ramifications of his prior conduct. You are not telling me stuff I did not already know. His sex life is his business, because no court has told him as part of a sentencing agreement that he is not allowed to have sex with as many women as he chooses.



The point being, it is believable. You aren't so dumb as to not realize that are you?[/QUOTE]

See above.

 

I didn't say Monica wasn't consensual just more evidence of the dirty old man thing, bad try though. What else Lewinsky did do however was create a hostile workplace for other employees in that subordinate workers who did grant the boss sexual favor got special treatment, favors and rewards. That was produced as evidence in the Jones case under the Molinari amendment which Clinton signed with much fanfare from women's groups as more protection for women in the workplace. He and the left then complained when he had to give such testimony.

 

You>> You could try and ask me about the perjury charges he actually faced, but you'd be the first.

Me>> He was held in contempt of court for it and plea bargained admitting it to the criminal charge. He submitted a false affidavit, do you know what that is in a court of law?

I'M ASKING.............THERE THE CAPS HELP?

You just demonstrated you don't know the legal ramifications of his prior conduct, his sexual behavior as a government boss with government employees was OUR business. His sexual behavior with a subordinate employee was the business of the court in a lawsuit filed by another subordinate employee and therefore our business. His lying under oath and committing perjury in a court was our business as a matter of public trials and the fact he was PRESIDENT of the United States at the time.

The point being, it is believable. You aren't so dumb as to not realize that are you?

 

And those matters became our business once they become part of a record in a deposition. This is not because he hasn't been and it hasn't even been alleged in the mock story.

 

You don't think he owed marital fidelity to Hillary? Especially being the big champion of women's rights that she's supposed to be? Some champion. She didn't even have the ovaries to leave him after he cheated on her. Again. And again. And again. And again.

Exactly what kind of empowerment message is that supposed to be sending to young women? "Be strong! Be independent! ......but let your husband disrespect you constantly."

- - - Updated - - -

This is also why the Democrat witch hunt against Clarence Thomas was bull(*)(*)(*)(*), by the way. Because look how staunchly they defend Bill Clinton. Betcha they would have defended Justice Thomas too if he had a (D) next to his name. Ya think?