Absolutely and utterly hilarious. NIST have falsified themselves, nevermind what Jones did. NIST lead investigator Shyam Sunder tells PM. Those clouds of dust may create the impression of a controlled demolition, Sunder adds, "but it is the floor pancaking that leads to that perception." http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/debunking-911-myths-world-trade-center NIST's findings do not support the “pancake theory” of collapse, which is premised on a progressive failure of the floor systems in the WTC http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/faqs_wtctowers.cfm The NIST report contradicts itself from start to finish, as you would probably know if you had read it.
Ok, so if he has no proof, we are to simply take him at his word? Good luck with that standing up to scrutiny. Any comments on his lack of scientific approach, which I posted twice?
Jones has enough evidence of his claims to share but to prove it in a court of law would be a waste of time and resources. I do not blame him for exposing their tactics and not following up with a lawsuit. Lawsuits can be taxing even in slam dunk cases.
What about sharing his samples and work with the worldwide scientific community and letting the results speak for themselves as well? Is that too difficult and taxing?
<sigh> assuming again?....the report contradicts Sunder,nothing else...besides he didn't say anything about a pancake collapse,just the floor pancaking....
Really....Why not present his 'proof' to an outside source who might have the assets to take a case like this to court?
It's far more profitable to continue to scam the rubes. S. Jones, A. Jones, Fetzer, Gage, Griffin ... all glorified sideshow con men selling snake oil to the faithful.
Jones is soo confident of his findings that he refuses to share any of his samples with Cornell, Princeton, RPI, CalTech, or any other institution of higher learning or engineering firm, to confirm his findings. sounds like he has something to hide.
Jones is senile and wasn't all that sharp at his zenith. Dumb SOB does not even understand European or Mayan iconography, but wrote a paper claiming to "prove" that the Mayan god of healing, Itzamna, was actually Jesus Christ risen from the dead doing a victory tour in Yucatan. Pathetic superstitious twit. Stupid little git. He doesn't even know the difference between kaolin and elemental aluminum under a scanning electron microscope. BYU wLong past his pull date. And NO, that turd Harrit did not prove anything by setting fire to his paint chip in an oven with an oxygen atmosphere. It burned like paint, not like thermite. Any hose dragger will tell you that. The moron needs to show us that he can do it in a vacuum or in an argon atmosphere. He also needs to make the chip glow at least as bright as the flames dancing across the top of it like the flames of a guttering candle. You people have all, so far, failed Fire Science 101.
Yes, I do. That's how I know those two senile turds are playing with paint chips. If I hadn't looked at their propaganda films, I wouldn't have noticed the kaolin of the fact that their chips only burned on the surface like a Class A fuel, rather that as a Class D accelerant.
They can't find any because it aint there. Tons of freaking PAINT, but no thermite. Idiot boy Jones needs to prove that he found thermite, because nobody else has and he hasn't even shown us a picture of his supposed "thermite." You people need to learn how this thing called "research" works.