9/11 Pentagon Attack - Behind the Smoke Curtain - Barbara Honegger

Than what?

 

no, he cannot

 

I didn't realise BJ was a no planer..

 

I'm not. I just got done saying that I don't know what happened but certainly there is more to the story than just an airplane hitting the Pentagon. Those concrete walls are thick and filled with reinforcing rebar. Those exit holes need more explaining.

- - - Updated - - -

You don't actually believe that the airplane did all that damage to the Pentagon, do you?

 

Of course I do. You forget... of the two of us, I'm the one with the actual engineering degree.

 

You are a self proclaimed expert on construction and laws of motion, why do you tell us what happened

 

Why don't we just form a grand jury and investigate it properly like a civilized society should do and put these truth vs. lies to rest? That has never been done.

 

Have you been here yet?

http://therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz/

Also, only the outer wall was reinforced. The C ring punch out hole is just plain brick. Between the impact hole and the C ring is nothing but open office.

 

Yes, I've been to that amateur website.

Does this look like damage from an airplane to you?

 

You seem unclear on the concept. Grand juries bring charges. They are not triers of fact, nor are they triers of law. They cannot decide and they cannot convict. They leave that up to the trial courts.

- - - Updated - - -

Yes.

It does.

 

Yep

 

Grand Jury Investigation

 

I should point out, a common misconception, is the damaged area to the bottom right of the main impact hole, it appears there are 2 or 3 columns still remaining there. They are in fact potions of the second story structure hanging downwards. If they were not there, it would just be a large empty gap where the right wing/engine went through.

 

Sorry BJ, but no matter which way you look at it when you take the full scale of the damage to the Pentagon into account, it is entirely consistent with an airliner impact. It is entirely inconsistent with a drone or missile. Taking into account, radar, witnesses, debris and DNA, and your no planer argument falls flat on its face.

 

And why wouldn't I?

 

[video=youtube;1cT8WWt61eg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1cT8WWt61eg[/video]

 

Nothing there contradicts my post. A grand jury is not a trier of fact or a trier of law. All they can do is bring charges.

 

the official story for 9-11 has already stood up in an American court.

- - - Updated - - -

sorry bro, but there shall be no more investigations into 9-11.

its over. its been over for years.

and with that, I am done talking to these poor souls.

 

In re: the "exit hole." The wrecked landing gear can even be clearly seen in this photo taken from the service road between the C and B rings.

 

I see you found the exit hole.

 

I see you lack evidence to support your position.

 

Interesting, since I never offered a position other than doubt that the official theory was fact.

 

....and as I said, you cannot support your position.

 

Unfortunately for you I don't have a position other than I don't believe the official position. The lie of the official position is obvious.

 

So obvious you can't show it.