9/11 Pentagon Attack - Behind the Smoke Curtain - Barbara Honegger

The evidence proving it was an airplane is overwhelming and irrefutable. Conspiracy theorists though, have spent countless years ignoring evidence, distorting truths, making stuff up, using sources that have no credibility and just simply showing no intergrity.

 

I found what you call the exit hole. Having actually spent time in the Pentagon, I would have considered that inside the building, and thus not an "exit" anything.

 

Because if you dont get the right answer you will want to do it again

and again............

and again............

and again............

and again............

 

No, it is not obvious. If you doubt the official story, but have no cogent alternative, you are simply babbling like an infant, or like that mental munchin Honneger. Your belief is an utter superstition.

 

Babbling like an infant eh? They killed 125 people at the Pentagon on 9/11.

- - - Updated - - -

The truth is rather important. People were murdered that day.

 

A lot of people died that day, Hannibal. If I had my way whoever participated in the killing and cover-up would spend the rest of their days in solitary confinement.

 

There are a lot of people participating in the cover-up. The facts surrounding the events of 9/11 will become known.

 

Then why did you call it an exit hole? Why did you deny there was an exit hole? You know 125 people died at the Pentagon that day a horrible death. This is not a game. This is mass murder. There is no statute of limitation for murder. A proper investigation is in order.

- - - Updated - - -

We are just looking for the truth Mike12. Whoever is responsible should pay for their actions.

 

There might be more investigations into 9/11. Grand jury investigations are up to the people not authorities. Common Law Grand Jury

 

When will the experts from your video launch their grand jury?
Their own investigation?

 

It only takes 25 people.

 

And you claim there are thousands; what's the hold up? Are they all cowards, or do they simply lack evidence?

 

No, they do not. Your insistence that there are any concrete walls is just plain stupid. There is not a single picture anywhere of a concrete wall. Only stupid people would mistake a brick wall for concrete. Only an intellectually or ethically challenged person will try to convince another that there are concrete walls.

And why do you refer to "exit holes" in the plural? There is only one location that could be described as featuring an exit hole, where the bolus of scrap at the end of the mass came to rest after knocking out the far wall.

Nothing other than an object the size and shape of a 757 could have done that damage. No known munitions or demolition charges could have done the damage observed.

Don't cite that French criminal Pierre-Henri Bunel. The sick bastard started lying on 9/12/01 and has not stopped since, unless he has croaked without my hearting of it.

 

I don't think they are cowards. It is an organizational block at the moment. Funding. The only thing worse than the people who actually did the dirty deed is the people covering it up. Anyone covering up the facts surrounding 9/11 is guilty of conspiracy after the fact. If we can put those people behind bars, then we could get to the actual culprits. Don't you agree? Would you be interested in joining a common law grand jury to find the truth about 9/11?

 

Funding? They are 'experts' in one of the most lucrative fields in the world.
Why do you need me? You have 'thousands', and it only takes twenty-five.
Sounds to me like you only have excuses instead of evidence.

But I'll tell you what: show me real evidence and I'll lead the formation of a grand jury. (Hint: show me evidence, don't link me to a YouTube video of false claims and opinions.)

 

The purpose of the grand jury is to find evidence with subpoena powers. What we know for a fact is that office fires can not collapse buildings in 15 seconds or less. That is impossible. So the truth is that something besides office fires brought three buildings down on 9/11 and destroyed part of the Pentagon. Would you be interested in finding the truth? Would you like to join?

 

Sorry reverend,but your kangaroo court would still need PROOF,something you don't have

 

Now you are backpedaling. Will your 'experts' form a grand jury or not? (You said it only takes 25)
What's the holdup, BJ?

 

I am not backpedaling. The holdup is getting 25 people who want to learn the truth. Truthers have taken such a beating from the liars that getting the truth told is tough.

 

You say you have thousands of experts: why aren't they doing it themselves? Impotency or cowardice?
You ALSO say that the 'truth movement' is growing, now you say you can't even get 25 to agree with you???

Which is it?

 

Odd,the way I always understood it to work is a grand jury was seated to look at specific evidence in a case to decide if it was to be bound over for trial.

Only THEN would the subpoenas start...

 

Exactly. I wonder when the 'experts' at AE911 will stop milking the money and present their evidence?

 

9/11SpeakOut.Org

Effects of a High Speed Crash

[video=youtube;dn_fZZ74MQU]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn_fZZ74MQU[/video]
Perhaps an airplane did hit the Pentagon. I don't know. There are still plenty of good unanswered questions.

 

None of those from dave and john are 'good questions',they assume a LOT

 

As a taxpayer, they are questions I would like to know the answer to. I think they are great questions. A lot of people are asking questions.

Chossudovsky: The Toronto Hearings on 9/11

[video=youtube;CQqESHt0vqI]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQqESHt0vqI[/video]