911 Mr Demo says: Will the REAL COLLAPSE please stand up

A "controlled demolition" wouldn't cause any damage to neighboring buildings. Words mean things. If it's damaging a neighboring building to the point it has to be demolished at a later date too, then it's a hardly a "controlled demolition."

Hence: WTC 7 did not fall into its own footprint. No amount of silly gifs or smilies will change that.

 

ok time for me to take a break, my gut is starting to cramp from laughing so hard!

Thanks for putting up the grand slam top shelf ignorant posts I have heard in about 15 years.






I cant take it anymore!

 

The truth hurts, doesn't it? Buh bye.

 

This thread is a goldmine of goalpost moving...

First we get "into own footprint"
Then "close to own footprint"
Then "as close to own footprint as you can get with a 47 storey building"
Then to finish it off we get a total reversal "buildings that big can't fall into their own footprint"

Thus demonstrating that 'truthers' have just brilliantly debunked one of their central pieces of evidence that WTC7 was destroyed by Controlled Demolition. Genius.

 

​

 

I have never seen someone declare victory as much as koko. It's fascinating. No matter how right or wrong he is, he instantly declares himself the victor. I mean, how is this guy not considered a paid shill? If he doesn't make the truth movement look horrible than who does?

 

286 POSTS AND NOT ONE TROUGHER RESPONDED TO THE CHALLENGE!

NOT (*)(*)(*)(*)ING ONE!



They never go off script, ever notice that?




911 TROUGHER DISCUSSION RULES:

1) Troughers shall not venture off script

2) See rule # 1)

There you go pal, have at it!

Go off script and be a hero!

 

Fangbeer responded directly, and the OP couldn't address his points.

Now the OP lies that no one addressed his thread. Hilarious!

Why is it that 'truthers' can't tell the truth?

 

I'll make you a deal little fella. I will break down each and every one of those explosions, including which ones do and do not use explosives. Just for kicks I can include the dates, and companies that did them.

In exchange, I get to ask you 4 questions, no bull(*)(*)(*)(*). If I take the time to type all that stuff out, you have to answer 4 questions for me with complete honesty. The ball is in your court, let me know if you hang kiddo.

 

This is the Sisyphus of threads with Koko playing the role of the boulder.

 

Well gee thanks BIG GUY!

See now that defeats the purpose doesnt it?

I cant tell you which companies did what or what the documented circumstances are in each case because I never looked. I am winging it based on my expert opinion from what I see in each case.

Now you know basically what I am looking for, you stated no questions, you might be a total perv and want to know what color underwear I have on for all I know.

State your questions and lay it on the table as I have.

I have already chewed up fang and hannbal and spit them out what makes you think you are exempt?

 

Would read again.

Seriously koko, that was some priceless sh1t right there.

 

That was a swallow, not a spit.

Of course if Jojo can't tell even tell what 'footprint' means, the rest is going to be far to difficult for him.

 

hanbal thinks a footprint is on the bottom of his shoe.








fine; define a footprint in demolition terms.

 

http://www.equipnet.com/landing.aspx?id=5365

WTC 7 did not meet the above definition, as it damaged other buildings when it collapsed.

 

geesus your easy

the reason for falling in its own footprint is not the definition.

that is the definition for IMPLOSION not "in its footprint" how tarded!

I asked what the definition, is and will give you one last try, or be forced to conlcude you dont (*)(*)(*)(*)ing know.

what is the definition of: "in its own footprint"

 

Apparently you couldn't comprehend what I quoted. Here, read it s l o w e r:

Don't hurt yourself when you move those goalposts.

 

Why?....no building did so on 9/11,so you're still shoveling the red herrings...

 

My money says he flees from your deal. Quickly.

 

ok now you all can see where the problems are here.

troughers are too (*)(*)(*)(*)ing tarded to even know how to read a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing dictionary.





dealing with (*)(*)(*)(*)ing 2 year olds here

have mommy explain it!


.

 

you see my challenge what is yours? list the questions. I dont do surprise questions. for all I know you might want to know what color underwear I have on.

 

Not only were you unable to comprehend what was written, you just confirmed and admitted that (according to the definition of building implosion) WTC 7 was not a demolition.

Classic 'truther' tripping over his own words. You just get funnier every day Jojo.

 

I'm still waiting to hear the definition of "building footprint" that includes area within a completely different building's footprint.

 

Looks like I'm going to have a long wait.

 

How'd he get banned?