No, I didn't add my opinion I noted a matter of fact. You STATED that your views are "morality" and other people's views are NOT.
I've not seen anything from you or others who believe as you do that would address what I pointed out.
That is pretty insulting coming from someone who has shown no inclination to discuss those issues where abortion is necessary
And this is because your “morals” do not deal with the reality that sometimes abortion is not just necessary biput vital for the survival of the woman
I believe that prick has only relatively recently become a slang for penis. Prick has for the longest time just been a generalized insult, applicable to women as well as men. I'm willing to be the nearness of sound with the short form of Richard is what has finally associated it with the penis.
Nothing wrong with that. From what I've seen someone needs to be lecturing American men and women about sex.
And that would achieve? Do YOU like to be “lectured” about YOUR lifestyle choices? Would you appreciate someone telling you how “wrong” you are every time you had a soft drink or a burger? A large proportion of women having abortions are in a stable relationship. What? Surprised? Did you think it was just “horny teenagers”?
Sorry I was using MY standards where I do research before I post because every so often something new comes up
Some of this we can blame on unpopular British kings - to this day in rhyming slang a “Richard” is a “Richard the third” = turd
Exactly. It's about Christians forcing their version of morality on the rest of us, and it is entirely unconstitutional.
I'm 70. Prick has been slang for jerkwad men since I was a child. It is definitely not new, that's a lame excuse if that's how the mods here see it. I see it as blatant gender bias. MODS: Prove me wrong. Why can I use prick but not pu$$y?
Rather my point. Prick has only recently become synonymous with d*ck, both as a personal descriptor and in reference to a penis. Even so not many are yet using it that way, relatively speaking. So it has not yet reached the level of pu**y, which many have forgotten used to refer to cats. Actually now I am wondering how that association came about.
For the duration of this thread I self-identify as a women. I speak with same authority as you. my opinion is worth every bit as much as yours.
Irrelevant. A woman telling another woman what to do with her own body is an opinion that is worth a "fart in a windstorm". Bodily autonomy is not a woman only right. It applies to many situations. IF you want to end bodily autonomy such that we can force women who do/can get pregnant, then we can force pregnancy upon her as well, and expand beyond that to forcing others to give up organs, blood and marrow to save the lives of others, since right of life trumps bodily autonomy, the way you are presenting your arguments.
I suppose that would be you doing the lecturing then. So you are in favour of indoctrination and moral diktat from one point of view. Why am I not surprised? It worked so well on you.
Can I suggest that those who think they own the right to impose their moral stances via law onto the majority of the population make it illegal for men to have sex before marriage. Let's see if the moralistic politicians would support that.
