Against Abortions mean you are Pro-Life

Enumerated, meaning 1st Amendment - freedom of speech, 2nd Amendment - right to bear arms...
abortion, not mentioned.

- - - Updated - - -

Why would I have to explain what I mean? Because you can't
understand plain English?

 

What are you talking about? Is an enumerated right of a higher rank than any other right? This is ridiculous

 

I understand it fine.

It is you that pretends not to understand the difference between a noun and a descriptive adjective and pretends that the terms Life, Human life, Human being, and a human all mean the same thing.

Disingenuous obfuscation so typical of anti aborts. Can't clarify what they mean because they know they have no valid argument for their claims.

 

Yes. It is. Because it is enumerated. It means it is set in stone, not
a made up right by Justices on the Supreme Court.

- - - Updated - - -

Once again, I can't explain it any clearer. If you are still confused I'm afraid
there is nothing that I can do for you. You will probably always be that way.
I'm hanging up now...bye.

 

Seems a pattern. Fallacy and disingenuous obfuscation are the lame tools of the anti aborts because they realize at the end of the day they have no valid argument.

 

You claiming that "Life, Human Life, Human Being, a Human" all mean the same thing is about as clear as New York Snow.

When I point out that these terms mean different things your response, "You figure it out", is yet another lame and disingenuous attempt at feigning ignorance because you have no argument.

Look at how you run and hide when your lack of ability to support your claims is put under the spotlight.

How pathetic heh heh heh ... I laugh in your general direction.

 

And euphemisms are the tool of choice for pro choicers.
"an abortion" "just a fetus" "women's reproductive rights" "product of conception"

 

You are the one feigning ignorance. You are the one that cannot
discern between these terms. You honestly don't know that we
are not arguing about civil rights for a sperm? We are talking
about the abortion argument. We know what the science says.
Life begins at conception. Only people who are playing dumb
are having trouble with that simple fact.

 

Holy cow that is hilarious. Rights come in an order now . Lol

 

How is the term "women's reproductive rights" a Euphemism ?

A Euphemism for what ?

 

That is the question, isn't it? ...

 

Yes they do. Like your right to free healthcare (it doesn't really exist).

 

Uh....it's not a right.....yet. Hilarious

 

It is not my fault that you can not figure out that life exists prior to conception.

Repeating nonsense over and over again does not make nonsense into sense

Falsely claiming "Science says" - when Science clearly states that life exists prior to conception will not turn your disingenuous nonsense into sense either.

Pretending there is no difference between the terms "Life, Human life, a Human, and Human being" and then refusing to say what you mean does not help you either.

 

He didn't say it was A human life, he said CLEARLY HUMAN LIFE NOT A HUMAN LIFE.... You keep changing from nouns to adjectives, squirming and wriggling.. and are the only one confused....

 

Obviously a question you are afraid to answer for fear that your nonsensical claim will be proven thus

 

What is hilarious is your inability to know that you are expressing a certain
level of ignorance regarding the Constitution.

 

Quote Originally Posted by FoxHastings View Post

Did you mean Jack Nicholson?

Again, forced abortions do happen just as forced pregnancy and forced child birth happen...all are illegal because FORCE was involved....but you LIKE FORCING women to do things so why do YOU object when someone else FORCES them to do something??


And I never click on your links or videos because they have all been debunked so many , many times by other posters that I know in advance they're crap.

 

You think rights come in a pecking order which is hilarious. Public education is a right. Where does it fall in the order? Lol

 

I know life exists prior to conception. When did I say it didn't?

So now who is obfuscating? Who is being disingenuous? Who
is using a strawman argument that there is life before conception?

Life begins at conception. This is a scientific fact. What part of
that do you not understand? What part of that do you not agree
with?

Are you sure you want to argue that a sperm is a human life? Are
you sure that you want to say that sperm deserve civil rights?

If life doesn't begin at conception, when does it begin?

 

A sperm is not human life, it is a sex cell. There, is that better?

A human has 46 chromosomes, a sperm has 23. It can be a human
sperm, but it is not human life.

 

You just keep on diggin' that hole.

 

Marriage is a right. Is that before or after education? Lol

 

You are just spouting off all kinds of stupidity and don't even know it.

 

Can't answer the question.....huh? Lol