And Yet People Defend Hamas

When World War I ended in 1918 with an Allied victory, the 400-year Ottoman Empire rule ended, and Great Britain took control over what became known as Palestine (modern-day Israel, Palestine and Jordan).

The Balfour Declaration and the British mandate over Palestine were approved by the League of Nations in 1922. Arabs vehemently opposed the Balfour Declaration, concerned that a Jewish homeland would mean the subjugation of Arab Palestinians.

The British controlled Palestine until Israel, in the years following the end of World War II, became an independent state in 1947.
https://www.history.com/topics/middle-east/history-of-israel#

Looks like the lawful owners of the land gave it the Jews. The Ottoman empire LOST, Britain WON.

 

The Ottoman Empire was the loser. sucked to be them. The United Nations gives far too much status to third world nations that contribute nothing

 

Why were whites able to be supreme?

 

Let's take a closer look at Mr. Balfour shall we in order to determine if the current state of Israel was conceived by a white supremacist entity:

We have to face the facts,” Lord Balfour said. “Men are not born equal, the white and black races are not born with equal capacities: they are born with different capacities which education cannot and will not change.”

 

They made the most devastating bombs.

 

Irrelevant. Islamists have always pretended they are superior to non Muslims. they just lost at a game they always tried to play

 

Why were whites better armed than Islamists and blacks?

 

Lol. Your Messiah, lord Balfour was an avowed anti black racist

 

They had more motivation to kill masses of ppl.

 

You like that one turtle?

 

Oppenheimer. The devil incarnate

 

that's bullshit. Shaka's forces displayed a quarter of the African population south of the Sahara. His armaments were not sufficient to kill more. Idi Amin and Macias proved that african despots with modern weapons could kill thousands. Pretending that black Africans and the Islamists were more peaceful than whites because whites were more advanced in terms of developing weaponry is crap.

 

As opposed to Tojo and Hirohito?

 

You've made yourself very clear on whether or not you condemn the murder of Jews. Do you celebrate them or just indifferent to them?

 

LOLOLOL!!!!

and the Earth is flat.

 

If he didn't invent the bomb, the Germans or Russians would have.

Its not our fault us Jews are really smart.

 

But I'd amin or Shaka were not motivated to kill, they were motivated by the survival instinct and protection of their land. White leaders are motivated by killing around the globe, as many ppl as possible just for the lolz

 

Oppenheimer himself said he was an indiscriminate killer. The Japanese have more honour in their pinky toe than the entirety of Israeli population

 

Rwanda genocide.

Case closed.

 

So smart that paragliders managed to invade Israel lmao

 

100 million died in Europe during the war.

 

Should I reply like the official Israeli spokesperson...hmm. I'm more intelligent than that.

 

Imagine how many would die in Africa if they had modern armies and trained soldiers.

 

Heaven forbid that Africa goes that route but the europeans are very persuasive just like the devil.

 

They didn't. The land in question wasn't sparsely population with Jews. With a mass migration of Zionist Jews along with their terrorist groups in the 1920s. There was no peaceful coexistence even comparable today. Right now Israel hosts 70% of its population (Jewish population) being foreign born. There was no massive amount of Jews in that area. It was only at the collapse of the Ottoman Empire and it changing hands with the British did that change.

The land was arbitrated based upon the UN in the 1940s which neither side agreed upon. It was effectively decolonized it left to their own devices but, the generation that occupied Palestine in the 1940s were almost entirely foreign born peoples. If there was a generation of living it would've been in their late teens if they born in Palestine at the time of the migrations.

It's not a feeling if it is true. Jews own the media and thus dictate what is history. They dictate what is news. If you only hear from the grapevine from the Communists you're only going to hear rhetoric from Communists exclusively. There is no diversity of thought. Especially so whenever a guest appeared and the words "Anti-Semite" get thrown around for simply challenging a statement a Jew says which could end your career.

The Jews have been a problem for a long time. Look at todays society whether it's Liberal or Conservative. Both sides have a Jew hierarchy on both. The challenge to that hegemony has only occurred in the past decade or so with the rise of Nationalists and Radical Decolonization/Reverse Colonization movements. Every form of media is owned directly be a Jewish person. Every media outlet has Jewish CEOs/Management. Even the US government has 10 departments being led or in 2nd command to a Jewish person. They only makeup 2% of the population but, control nearly 90% of it.