Baltimore Prosecutor Fights to Cover Up Freddie Gray Autopsy Report

Why would the prosecutor want the autopsy report suppressed?
Shouldn't the medical examiner's findings support the righteous prosecution of the Baltimore police?
What could be the motive?


Baltimore Prosecutor Fights to Cover Up Freddie Gray Autopsy Report

Posted By Daniel Greenfield On June 4, 2015 @ 11:01 am In The Point




"When a criminal case is legitimate, the government should have nothing to hide.

The #BlackLivesMatter hoaxes invariably required covering up key pieces of evidence. The Michael Brown hoax in Ferguson required covering up security footage of him robbing a store just before.

The parties in the coverup were Eric Holder and his DOJ. The video came out but the Obama Gang made sure to punish the Ferguson cops anyway.

Now in Baltimore, hack prosecutor Marilyn Mosby is desperately fighting [2]to cover up the autopsy of dead drug dealer Freddie Gray.

Her claim is that “she doesn’t want to litigate the case in the media” after numerous Sharptonesque press conferences and appearing as a ringmaster at an actual circus as part of her corrupt victory lap.


Baltimore State’s Attorney Marilyn Mosby plans to seek a protective order that would block the release of Freddie Gray’s autopsy report and other “sensitive” documents as she prosecutes the six police officers involved in his arrest.

Mosby told The Baltimore Sun that prosecutors “have a duty to ensure a fair and impartial process for all parties involved” and “will not be baited into litigating this case through the media.”

But an attorney for one of the officers said the effort shows that “there is something in that autopsy report that they are trying to hide.”

Obviously.

The basic answer might be that Freddie Gray had more substances in his bloodstream than a toxic waste dump. Considering his drug history that wouldn’t be surprising.

But there might also be something that would introduce serious doubts into the official narrative. Such as pre-existing injuries.

Either way, Mosby has had no problem trying this case in the media and has no commitment to a fair and impartial process. The only reason to hide this information is to try and suppress as much of it as possible later in court.

Mosby and her conspirators have made this a national issue. The public has a right to know what Mosby is trying to hide.


Baltimore’s chief prosecutor declared her intention to seek the protective order in a court filing Monday. She also asked for more time to respond to defense motions that she and her office be removed from the case and that the case be tried outside Baltimore.

“It’s very disconcerting that six [defense] lawyers were able to write these motions in two weeks, and the state’s attorney’s office has over 200 or some attorneys and they need an extension,” Bates said. “To me, it’s almost as if the state’s attorney’s office is playing games.”

Well she’s busy. She has to appear at circuses and maybe put in another appearance on Judge Judy."


Article printed from FrontPage Magazine: http://www.frontpagemag.com

URL to article: http://www.frontpagemag.com/2015/dg...ghts-to-cover-up-freddie-gray-autopsy-report/

 

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nat...gray-autopsy-release-report-article-1.2245698
a better source

 

Quote: She reportedly also wants a gag order that would prevent those involved from discussing the case in public.

She may have to forgo anymore interviews in magazines I suppose right?

 

That depends on which side of the argument she's actually fighting for, lol. She's a State attorney, so it's possible she's working in collusion with Baltimore in an attempt to shuffle the Freddie Gray case into obscurity. (just a thought, since this thread seems to be based more on suspicion also) I, personally, got the feeling that she was not on Freddie Gray's side, but was just given the spotlight to defuse the tensions of the Baltimore public. I've noticed when these things happen they usually drag out a Black official of some sort (like a Black police captain or whatever) to speak out on the issue.

Who knows. It is suspicious though...

 

I dont think that is particular accurate especially if you look at the ethnicity of three of the six police and the fact that the mayor, police chief and prosecutor are also African American. So unless their own communities are prejudiced against themselves this should not be a racial thing.

Now I am willing to accept that hypothesis but then shouldn't that be a huge thing that we should speak about?

Either way it seems to me that it is improper to go and do magazine interviews while while she is still working the case. Once it is over sure but before smacks of something rotten.

 

Black people in office doesnt signify no racism.

 

Not just in office but also those directly involved are we claiming that the three black officers are racist against blacks?

 

The autopsy report will be made public at trial. Don't know why that would upset anyone.

 

It does not bother me any either. I wish we did not reveal the defendants to the press unless those defendants allowed it until they are convicted. If you are proven innocent of a crime but the media has already tarred and feathered you then you have been punished for something you never did. Those six cops lives are ruined no matter the results of this trial.

 

Black person being arrested does not signify racism but you cant tell the media that....

 

Is racism the charge? I thought it was police brutality.

 

Racism is the charge from many in the public domain, police brutality is the legal charge and if they did it I hope they are convicted. I believe you are assuming something about my opinions of this situation that may not be accurate. Are you getting at something with your questioning sir or madam?

 

Sometimes...

Some cases I'd bet my left leg would have turned out different if the suspect was White. Other cases might be just media rage-bait (on both sides...takes two to tango). In the end, racism is one of the hardest things to prove and most people tend to go with either the police are saints or Black poor people are saints.

 

Crying racism at the top of your lungs without pause is a great way to block anybody else from pointing out that the person involved was a career criminal who died while committing a crime.

/cough TrayvonBrownGray

 

Personally, I hadn't given the autopsy report any thought until Mosby tried to hide it, now I want to see it. There were so many mistakes in Baltimore and now everyone is trying to cover their collective butts. I believe this woman is trying to score points by appeasing a mob and she'll hang those 6 cops if that's what it takes. In my eyes she has no credibility.

 

You mentioned racism in your post, so I was asking whether racism was the offical charge.

In my experience, I've rarely seen a police officer get charged on something like racism or police brutality- even when there is evidence like video footage. I've long since known not to expect anything other than a possible relocation for the police officer- kind of like bad preists or bad teachers. In a number of these cases, it was shown that the police, the city, and others were making deliberate attempts to obstruct the cases in whatever way they could, but usually by the time this is revealed the media's been riding the story so hard that people are fatigued and don't care about it.

 

See there you go using logic in relation to a good conspiracy theory. That kind of thinking will get you into a lot of trouble around here.

 

The person wasn't a "career criminal" Mr. Hyperbole, he strong-armed a store clerk and stole something from a convenience store. Two different things. I agree, though, that he was a criminal, but this does not necessitate or justify indescriminate violence. At this point, you have two criminals. One not wearing a badge and one wearing a badge.

The reason we are supposed to respect police is because they are supposed to be disciplined proffessionals who operate above corruption, frustratation, prejudice, etc...

 

The Arrest Record of Future Astronaut and 3rd Son of Obama, Mr Freddie Gray.

March 20, 2015: Possession of a Controlled Dangerous Substance
March 13, 2015: Malicious destruction of property, second-degree assault
January 20, 2015: Fourth-degree burglary, trespassing
January 14, 2015: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute
December 31, 2014: Possession of narcotics with intent to distribute
December 14, 2014: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance
August 31, 2014: Illegal gambling, trespassing
January 25, 2014: Possession of marijuana
September 28, 2013: Distribution of narcotics, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, second-degree assault, second-degree escape
April 13, 2012: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, violation of probation
July 16, 2008: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession with intent to distribute
March 28, 2008: Unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance
March 14, 2008: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to manufacture and distribute
February 11, 2008: Unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance, possession of a controlled dangerous substance
August 29, 2007: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, violation of probation
August 28, 2007: Possession of marijuana
August 23, 2007: False statement to a peace officer, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance
July 16, 2007: Possession of a controlled dangerous substance with intent to distribute, unlawful possession of a controlled dangerous substance (2 counts)

Do you happen to have any documentation of this badge wearing criminal you seem to think exists?

 

I thought you were talking about Micheal Brown and I meant the cop is a criminal if he uses unjustified force.

But more to the point, the issue is not whether or not the suspect was a criminal or not. The issue is how this person was treated. Pointing to a cirminal pass does not automatically clear a person of police charges of abuse.

 

Don't think I can take www.frontpagemag.com seriously.

 

Go over there and debate the posters. Even their writers will respond to you.
You won't last long.
It's a pretty educated crowd.

 

Going there is a waste of time. The website is unlikely to be trustworthy.

 

Yeah....you don't have the stones or the brains for Frontpage......and I can prove it.

 

Most blacks don't think straight. That's the only explanation for why they are so criminal and dishonest. Just a warped culture looking to exploit other human beings any way they can.