Exactly, I have even seen this particular truther openly admit to cherry picking quotes to try and prove his point. It is simply dishonest. To willingly misqoute someone, to suit your ego driven need to be right, shows me just how dishonest someone is and the lengths they are willing to go. It lacks integrity.
Like I have said in other threads. The caveman story is the official story from the Bush administration. [video=youtube;hf0XI1X34mQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf0XI1X34mQ[/video] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hf0XI1X34mQ
Indeed, I do know the truth. Not sure why I would be on trial, but I have zero problem providing my testimony. You however, shouldn't jump in the deep end so quickly. Perjury is a serious crime.
No, it isn't. You keep cherry picking and spamming. The video does not say what you claim it does. Why can't 'truthers' tell the truth?
I would, but it's never going to happen. 'Truthers' lack three things to bring their case to trial: Evidence and balls.
please do point out where in the 9/11 commission report where it states "cavemen". I don't care how many times you say it, its still a lie.
We lacked proof of evidence until 2012. Now that we have proof, and the future of our children and grandchildren depend on bringing those who committed the crimes to justice, telling us we lack the determination to bring forth justice is premature. http://911justicecampaign.org/
No they don't. That is an utter lie. It is a vast understatement to call that claim a lie. http://www.benthamscience.com/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm It is a completely obvious lie, proven by every single, solitary piece of evidence which has emerged since the day itself.
How do you propose he achieves movement when he is met with outrageous lies at every turn? He gives you evidence and you respond by asking him for evidence. You simultaneously offer no evidence, yet insist every scientist in the world agrees with your false claims.
But that is textbook circular reasoning. Ignoring of course that you have not produced one genuine scientist who corroborates what you are saying, you are free to label any and every scientist who points out you are breaking the laws of physics as "insane". This is not an argument. It is a manipulation of the laws of reason for the sole purpose of deception.
Long story short...You STILL have no evidence. And you'd be laughed out of any courthouse if you thought you did.
The truthers are not arguing that the laws of physics were broken. They are saying it is impossible. The official NIST report argued that Newton's laws of physics were suspended. That is what is so danged funny about all of this nonsense. High School physics teacher David Chandler read the report and called them out on it so they had to amend their report to admit that freefall did indeed happen to WTC Building 7 for a period of time. NIST got schooled by a high school teacher.
The NIST report is fraudulent and it is an official document. The proof of fraud is documented. You are right about getting it presented to an honest judge and jury. That will be difficult.
They never argued that the laws of physics were suspended either you are simply stating a lie. there is no documentation any where of fraud on the part of NIST
You're trying to mislead those viewers who haven't done much research. You know NIST has been proven to be a fraud. Viewers, start watching this video at the 7:05 time mark. David Chandler 2010 "9/11 Analysis" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f6JN9cwY_OE
Cite the page of their report where they did this. Quote a passage from the report and supply the section.
but people have to understand those laws of physics to be capable of wrapping their minds around what you are saying. As chandler, a high school physics teacher pointed out, that its high school physics. Unfortunately since there is so much apprehension from the OSHuggers here, it sort of shows their level of physics knowledge is grade school maybe? Certainly not high school or there would be no argument about it. and of course in political physics they will demand you to cite NIST and anything less than a quote stating "We at NIST suspended physics" will be deemed as nist never saying such a thing because they dont understand what you are talking about requires an understanding of physics to make such a conclusion. Oh the cwazy web day weave in the name of politics.
It may be 'documented',but it's NOT 'proof',and it's NOT fraudulent... And with what you troothers have it won't just be difficult,It'll be impossible.
Buildings violating Newton's laws of motion are impossible. Getting a fair trial in a criminal court will no doubt be difficult but it is not impossible. Time will tell. Some judges are honest and may be willing to listen.
No you are the one attempting to mislead them with a fictional video rather than real research. I stated fact Not one piece of evidence shows NIST to be fraudulent. - - - Updated - - - No one ever said that a building violated Newton's laws of physics. You however falsely accused others of saying that it did.
