Best Truther video!!

Discussion in '9/11' started by Ronstar, Dec 9, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Quantumhead

    Quantumhead New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2013
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    More circular reasoning. Everybody who understands the laws of physics realises the official government account makes an utter mockery of them. Therefore, everybody who understands the laws of physics is "a silly truther" and can be automatically dismissed.

    Nothing you have so far said stands up to more than half a second's scrutiny. It is simply fallacy of language, with no basis in fact.
     
  2. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Jonathan Cole explains Newton's laws of motion with scientific experiments in a very clear manner yet the truth debunkers have worked very hard to discredit him. Cointelpro is a powerful force.

    9/11 Experiments: Newton vs. NIST
    [video=youtube;tejFUDlV81w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tejFUDlV81w[/video]
     
  3. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Keep saying that, never mind that it's no more true than the first dozen times you tried to pass off 'truther' fantasies as fact.
    Your movement collapsed over 5 years ago.
     
  4. Quantumhead

    Quantumhead New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2013
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm a very honest person, so I'll only keep saying it while you keep making absurdly false statements which qualify themselves with their own conclusions.
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ahhh,Irony...
     
  6. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No 'laws' were violated,you just don't understand them


    And it's not about judges being honest...It's the whackadoodle truther claims that ensure they won't be touched by a 10 foot pole..
     
  7. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Even after watching Jonathan Cole's demonstration you still don't understand Newton's laws of motion. It is elementary.
     
  8. Quantumhead

    Quantumhead New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2013
    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What are you hoping to achieve by making blatantly false statements? The official government story of the WTC collapses is not consistent with Newton's laws of motion.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    yep and you will be the next one to go on his iggy list! LOL
     
  10. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The WTC was not made of solid blocks. Cole invalidates his own experiment.
    Also: look up 'scaling'.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Yes, it is. Just because you have been mislead doesn't mean everyone has.
     
  11. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The 'demonstration' by cole means squat
     
  12. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes it is...You troothers just aren't applying correctly.
     
  13. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Good grief. Learn some physics.

    It really isn't all that hard to understand.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know lots of physics.

    Apparently it's quite difficult for you. The WTC was not made of solid blocks of ice.
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,029
    Likes Received:
    3,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually you are quite wrong and demonstrating that you know nothing of the laws of physics.

    This is why you see or hear no physics teachers or professors nationwide attacking the NIST report. The truthers can be dismissed because they confuse one or two quotes from Newon as ALL the laws of physics and how to apply them.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Do so yourself first you know nothing of the science of physics and they prove you wrong.
     
  16. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's physics. The demonstration was Newton's law of motion. Jonathan Cole's scientific experiments went clear over your head even though it is elementary.

    That's right. The WTC was not made of solid blocks of ice. The WTC Towers were steel frame buildings with 48 core columns with a base column 54 inches wide x 22 inches deep and 5 inches thick and 36 inches wide by 16 deep and 2 inches thick in the upper stories. Steel melts at 2600° F. Jet fuel burns at 410 degrees F

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    An airplane crash and the resultant one hour office fires could not have severed 48 - 2 inch thick steel columns let alone 5 inches thick steel at the base.
     
  17. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And here I thought you were the JFK truth debunker. What do you know about 9/11?
     
  18. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,029
    Likes Received:
    3,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I know everything you say is false about it is childishly false.
     
  19. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So? Who says the steel in the towers was melted?
     
  20. Brother Jonathan

    Brother Jonathan Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2013
    Messages:
    1,610
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Liars.
     
  21. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,029
    Likes Received:
    3,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Name one
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    NIST certainly didn't. You must be referring to the lying 'truthers' who falsely claim the steel was melted.
     
  23. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    19,029
    Likes Received:
    3,631
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope he never proved anything one way or the other about the NIST report
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Richard Gage, disgraced architect.
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,742
    Likes Received:
    1,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    none of his steel buildings collapsed from fire so thats sounds like an empty ad hominem attack to me
     

Share This Page