Billionaire Harlan Crow BOUGHT PROPERTY From JUSTICE THOMAS. The Justice DIDN'T DISCLOSE

Thomas isn't a trial judge. He can't have his thumb on the scale of justice.

 

You are too narrowly focused, he has not recused himself or has offered his recusal from cases which he and his family have been involved in some way, hence, thumb on the scales of justice.
e.g.
Justice Thomas Ruled on Election Cases. Should His Wife’s Texts Have Stopped Him?

 

Jackson ruled in favor of a company she's party owner of. You cool with that?

 

Liberal justices vote liberal:

Hooray!

Conservative justices vote conservative:

Impeach! Impeach!

If you can't find a reason, make one up!

Go after the black guy. It makes us look better.

 

LEGIT link please to back up claim and if it's comparable, yes, I would expect her to recuse.

 

Too late, she already didn't recuse and ruled in favor of the company she's part owner of. Should she resign?

 

I knew you wouldn't disappoint.

 

Hell no!

She's a liberal. That perfectly fine.

 

Without a legit link you might by gaslighting a strawman.....sorry, but your claim needs to be supported and since the support was requested and still not provided, I going to conclude you are making stuff up. Provide a legit link to your claim or you are conducting a low end rabbit chase that's failing. Put up...

 

If she did that? Yes. Please provide a link so I can keep it in my bag of tricks. Thanks.

 

He's right. Your claim isn't factually accurate.

 

You're not going to answer? Figures...lol

 

Can't put up can you? Another easy lay up for me....

 

Basically, you're dodging the question, like we all knew you would.

 

Can't put up a link to support a spuriously false claim? That was too easy for me to bury that BS nonsense "claim". I could do that sleeping. Put up....

 

Are you refusing to answer the question? If she did it, should she resign?

 

A legit link supporting your spurious gaslighting claim was requested three times and you have not yet provided one. Since your unsupported "claim" appears to be a mythical gaslight strawman, your unicorn question is irrelevant. Put up...

 

Who is talking of impeaching because he's a conservative? There's talk of impeachment because of ethical concerns of improperly receiving gifts.

 

Oh look, another inhabitant of the alternate reality!

You might be a little more believable if audio of the phone call wasn't available. You're literally telling us something didn't happen that we can go and listen to Trump saying. Have fun with that!

 

I've read the transcript and it doesn't say what you claim.

 

Then you read the wrong transcript or you read an edited one or you're just in denial. Like I said, have fun with that!

“All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have,” Trump says, according to audio of the call. “There’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, that you’ve recalculated.”

 

Right and he never told Raffensperger to "go find" votes.

I can't find the second sentence. Maybe you could find it in the transcript and show the full context?

 

Well folks, take a look at this;

BBC NEWS

15 March, 2023

Headline; Canadian Supreme Court Judge On Leave After Arizona Resort Altercation

“An alleged drunken altercation at an Arizona resort has landed a Canadian Supreme Court Justice on paid leave”

“Earlier this month, the Canadian Judicial Council announced it was reviewing a complaint received in January into Mr. Brown’s alleged conduct in Arizona. He has been on leave since Feb 1st as the judicial OVERSIGHT body looks into the matter”

————-

Wow! Canada has an independent judicial oversight body that investigates allegation of misconduct of federally-appointed judges.

 

We're going to need specifics.

If Sotomayor went on extravagant vacations with Soros and had her house upgraded for free, would you be okay with it?

 

Touché!