Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

"Dr Judy Wood's book will change the world. It is easy to see from her photographic evidence that nothing about that day matches our limited understanding of the laws of physics. This means something extraordinary to the planet. It means that a technology exists and is being used at this time in a very destructive way, which is different from anything we have seen before. Imagine, if we used this knowledge in a constructive way."

Jeff R. Besant, M.B.A., P.Eng.
Besant and Associates Engineers Ltd - Vancouver, BC

9-11 "Terrorists" Used Secret Technology
http://www.henrymakow.com/9-11_the_most_important.html​

 

'A technology exists', but she can't tell us what it is.....same old crazy Judy

 

That explains the problem nicely.

 

Google: “magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions”
http://www.google.com/search?q=magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear+reactions&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-USfficial&client=firefox-a#pq=magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear+reactions&hl=en&sugexp=pfwl&cp=44&gs_id=r&xhr=t&q=%E2%80%9Cmagnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear+reactions%E2%80%9D&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&client=firefox-a&hs=YLr&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&source=hp&pbx=1&oq=%E2%80%9Cmagnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear+reactions%E2%80%9D&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=&gs_upl=&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&fp=b616ebf6f30ab7a2&biw=1272&bih=591

"No one has yet to refute one piece of evidence given in her recent book. People have undertaken ad hominem attacks, but that just proves that they don't have anything to say about the evidence."

Jeff R. Besant, M.B.A., P.Eng.
Besant and Associates Engineers Ltd - Vancouver, BC

9-11 "Terrorists" Used Secret Technology
http://www.henrymakow.com/9-11_the_most_important.html​

 

By what process did "magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions" disintegrate the structural steel of the building? How did this process inhibit or prevent the expected release of energy caused by the oxidation of iron?

Are you trying to suggest that the nuclei of the atoms in the steel were affected by this process without a coinciding detectable particle emission? Where did the particles go?

 

It is hard to refute science fiction where one has to suspend one's knowledge of the real world to embrace the fiction.

magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions is a perfect example. Type it in to google and you get a little over 9 thousand hits, all relating back to Judy Woods' work of pure fiction. It is like on Star Trek where they link together real words as though it somehow gives the words new meaning. Example.

Electrogravitics came about in the 50s and were found to be a waste of time as a source of propulsion. Sounds cool, though, doesn't it! Add to that magentism and nuclear and you have the makings of a good sci fi story, but nothing in real life.

It just shows what a dental technician can think up.

BTW, What do you think about Woods' initial claims that the towers should have taken a lot longer to fall due to her billiard ball example where she claims every floor would have come to a complete stop and transferred all the energy into the floor below? For someone who claims to be an expert, how can someone be so patently stupid as to make this claim with a straight face?

 

This guy is a hit and run poster. He doesn't respond well to direct questions that can't be clipped directly from Wood's site.

At one point he had the nerve to accuse other people of a lack of critical thinking skills...

 

No such thing....try again

 

No one has read her recent book.

 

I've not read the thread I'll admit and I'm not too familiar with the actual parameters and specifications of this technology, it's just that I saw the word "nuclear".

Should that not cause evidence of a nuclear reaction? Fallout or whatever you want to call it?

Also the title of the weapon sounds like a staggering combination of universal forces.. Electromagnetic (why did they electro gravitic instead) plus gravity and nuclear (strong or weak) 3 possibly 4 out of 4. So the buildings are struck by ALL these forces?

Humans don't have even the foggiest clue about what gravity even is, let alone replicating it artificially with something besides mass which naturally exhibits it, save the strictly theoretical curvature of space/time (how do you replicate that). Only the E.T.s in movies are advanced enough to generate their own gravity waves to propel their spacecraft.

One more question, what exactly is striking the buildings.. Gravitons? Photons? All of 'em?

Maybe Emanual can shed light on this.. I'd prefer that to reading a whole book, seeing as Emanual is promoting the topic anyway (that's why I go to the forum instead of reading long books).

These questions are just based on me making assumptions based on the title of the weapon, perhaps I'm off track but Emanual could clarify that.

 

The hurricane was news at 8am, or should have been. At 9am, it is no wonder all chat about the weather was forgotten.

The 7am news, the 8am news, in New York, had no mention of a hurricane headed to that area, 400 miles away, and you find nothing remotely curious?

I find that very perplexing.

Why do you think that storm cell had no chance of landfall? I believe there was every chance, had that been a normal weather cell, it could go anywhere it wanted to. Is weather controlled? They are growing grass in the sands of Arabia, if that means anything.

 

False.

1. The hurricane was not headed to NY.

2. The hurricane was mentioned on the NY morning news.

I posted the video evidence here:

http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/...1-directed-energy-weapons-10.html#post4373795

 

How many people in this forum, have purchased a copy of this book? How can one criticize an author, in a serious way, if one has not purchased the book, and sat down and studied it?

I have purchased the book, and it is an eye opener. I have also watched several of her interview shows for radio.

IMHO, I do not think she has it nailed 100% If she did, her book would have never been published, and she would be pushing up daisies. I do think she raises some valid points. The rubble pile should be at least 30 stories deep at center, or about 300 feet tall. No rubble pile, equates to to rubble.

I want to know where building six went? It is hollowed out down to the last sub basement. No one goes there, in great detail. Building 1,2 & sometimes 7 is all anyone talks about. 3,4,5 & 6 hold some clues as to what happened that day.

 

You can easily see the crazy by just visiting her website. No need to send her money.

 

Weather cannot "go anywhere it wanted to" Weather is not alive. It does not decide where to go. It's governed by mechanics that humans have learned how to predict.

Weathermen predicted (correctly) that the storm had no chance of hitting land because of a high pressure system sitting over the eastern seaboard. This high pressure system was not created by man, it was simply another property of the natural weather pattern.

 

I'm a bit curious about this statement.

 

From living on the gulf coast and weathering several hurricanes, any weatherman will tell you predicting where a hurricane is going is close to gambling....guess the 9/11 weather machine was broken...

 

​

Army Joint Precision Strike Demonstration PowerPoint Slideshow
"Where Did The Towers Go?"
http://web.archive.org/web/20011021094118/http://peoiews.monmouth.army.mil/jpsd/WTC/wtc_qick_picts.pps​

 

A perfect 'truther' credo.

 

​

Eight Signs of Groupthink:
7. The emergence of self-appointed mind guards within the group—members who take it upon themselves to protect the leader and fellow members from adverse information that may prevent them from being able to continue their shared sense of complacency about the effectiveness and morality of past decisions.
http://www.astraean.com/borderwars/2008/02/8-signs-of-groupthink.html

 

Predicting where a hurricane will go in 3 weeks while it's forming in the gulf stream is like gambling. Predicting where it will be in 24 hours when there's a high pressure system covering the entire east coast is a sure thing. No computer model storm track showed the hurricane coming even remotely close.

What was the news media supposed to report on? People not filling sand bags? The absence of people taping windows? People putting out lawn chairs and hammocks? They covered it as a blurb in a weather segment. I don't see any reason why anyone should have made a bigger deal out of it then that.

 

Yep..many a time we've watched them head into mexico because we had high pressure sitting close to us....this was a non issue on 9/11....a red herring.

 

The storm is a piece of a puzzle. I live in Nebraska and our news, shows storms all over the northern hemisphere. That is called "The News".

To say it was not an important storm, when there are small pleasure craft that relies on newscasts, is not accurate. Every other storm is talked about in newscasts, unless I just dreamt that over the last half century.

Boating, aviation, has their own weather outlets, I am aware, but on every other day, the reports match up. The reporting is the same.

I do think it odd, broadcasts of news on that morning failed to report a storm at sea, so close it was causing lightning strikes at all three local airports for commercial travel.

Now, was the weather blackout a function of the military exercises going on that day? I think that very possible. However, you guys debating the side of the government position, how about you lay down your swords, and dig for the facts in this, rather than picking a side, and debating till you win or loose.

This is not a debate, this is our nation. This is our country. We need the facts in this. Anything else be laid to rest.

 

How is a storm that is 400 miles out at sea and moving away any threat to small pleasure craft? Why would this make the news?

Can you cite a source for this claim? I have not heard this bit of news.

If it was in fact a blackout, how does Judy know about it? The fact is, the storm was no longer a threat to the coast, and therefore not news. Even if this fanciful dream of harnessing the power of a hurricane where possible, it still wouldn't provide enough energy to do what Dr. Judy claims.

Any response to Fangbeer's queries?

 

Once again, this is false. The local stations did cover the hurricane and I provided you access to content that proves this. It was covered as it would be expected to be covered; as a passing comment in the local weather report. It was by no means a main story because it was not big news. It was not expected to hit landfall, it was nowhere near shore, hell, it wasn't even windy in NY...