Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

There are like dozens of hurricanes each hurricane season.. They're not going to report everything about every one.

They usually make the news if they have caused chaos in that country, have the potential to cause chaos or are expected to cause chaos in that country, or if they have caused chaos in another country(s).

That's why if you watch the news consistently throughout a hurricane season, they won't be like hurricane Albert this, hurricane Billy that, Hurricane Charlie this... It will be like hurricane Billy this and then the next time you hear the news about a hurricane they will be talking about Hurricane Jacob or something and you think what about all those in between letters? And those are just the ones that did their own thing without meeting the criteria I mentioned.

Their potential course can be somewhat predicted in most circumstances, with a margin of error of course.. I wouldn't trust a line they draw, they should put it as a triangle looking thing to express potential deviations..

They are not like tornadoes for example, which are impossible to predict and whose course is 100% random and they can literally turn 180 degrees and go back the way they came, spontaniously. (be careful storm chasers).

 

The weather reporting that day, is a small puzzle piece in a very big picture.

Physics were not according to standard textbooks on 9/11 IMHO.

Watch the video 9/11, The First 24 hours. It will show you those buildings all over Manhattan.

This video has no agenda, just shows video footage. As an accident investigator, watch this video.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnGa7ftqraQ"]9 11 Documentaries Videos WTC The First 24 Hours 2002 - YouTube[/ame]

 

So now that you've been proven wrong it's a small piece of the puzzle? Does this mean you're going to wait a few months before you bring up the same old tired stuff about hurricane Erin?

 

I keep seeing truthers making this claim. I can never figure out just what they really think they are saying. Are they trying to by hyperbolic, or do they really think someone changed the way the universe works in order to ... accomplish ... whatever their theory is? The hurricane powered nuclear space laser folks seem to be in this camp. Do they really believe that men in the government are omnipotent, or not constrained by the same universal forces that us regular Joes are constrained by?

If they are trying to be hyperbolic, do they realize they're trying to claim that NIST, and every university study of the event somehow got the math wrong? The language of physics is math. If truthers think that the math is wrong, why do they never show the correct math? The closest I've ever seen to any of them even trying to describe what they think should have happened mathematically is Psikeyhackr, and his math clearly doesn't describe the collapse.

That said, Ar10. Can you show me how "physics" behaved on 9/11 and how that behavior deviated from "standard textbooks?"

 

Directed Energy Weapon includes everything from an arrow to a laser. Im at a loss to understand what she is making the case for.

 

​

Should anyone be at a loss to understand what Dr. Judy Wood is
making for the case or have a need to know how "physics" behaved
on 9/11 and its deviated behavior from "standard textbooks",
please read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?. The truth is knowable.​

WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?

Hardcover: 540 pages
Publisher: The New Investigation (September 11, 2010)
Language: English
ISBN-10: 0615412564
ISBN-13: 978-0-615-41256-6
LCCN: 2090916516
Images and Diagrams: over 860
Shipping Weight: 3.5 pounds
Product Dimensions: 10.25 x 7.25 x 1.4 inches
http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/buy/​

 

They collapsed. We all saw them collapse. The towers were over 90% air by volume. Over 1.5 million tons of debris was removed which totally debunks Judy's bull(*)(*)(*)(*) claims. Crazy lunatic claims that most of the towers were vaporized are just that; crazy lunatic claims. While I am sure she can convince the gullible and weak minded that her claims have merit, anyone with an ounce of common sense and half a brain knows it is just bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

 

​

The truther movement sprang to life before the dust even settled at ground zero. Since then they have been whining, (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)ing and moaning that the government/Jews/NWO/<insert bad guy name here> was behind 9/11. Before all the facts were known, the truther movement gained popularity based on known lies and half truths. ("The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." - Vladimir Ilyich Lenin)

Now it is ten years down the road. The investigations have been done. The evidence is known. The facts are in. Everything has been examined. The truther claims hold no water whatsoever.

So, to all you truthers out there, what do you have to say for ten years of getting absolutely nothing accomplished? The few plausible theories you once had have been thoroughly debunked to the point where most truthers won't even claim which theory they actually believe in.

And where is the proof? There isn't a single piece of hard evidence that would stand up in a court of law that truthers can hang their hat on to prove a conspiracy until WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? by Dr. Judy Wood was published. The only thing truthers have left is opinion, coincidences (and even there they REALLY have to stretch to make most connections), and junk science the rest of the scientific / engineering community laugh at.

To your credit, you keep on pursuing your agenda more doggedly than the US postal service. Neither truth nor facts nor science nor light of day will keep you from spreading the lies. Why? I don't know. It seems to vary from truther to truther. Some are angry at the government. Some are racist. Some like the attention. Some like to feel superior while cutting others down. Some are a mix of the above. None of them are really after the truth. If they were, they wouldn't be truthers. They would be people with honest questions who would look at ALL the facts, not just the facts that support one side.

So keep it up as long as you want, Truthers. I'll be here to debunk the crap you post. Others are stepping up to confront the lies and the opinions presented as fact and proof like Dr. Judy Wood has. What you are doing is a disgrace and makes a mockery of those who lost their lives on 9/11. But hey. If the truth isn't important, neither are the lives of those who died on 9/11, right?

Truth doesn't need a movement, only lies do.
Truth is knowable, read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? ​

 

Why can't you make the salient points here? Oh right. That would require understanding the lunacy that Woods wrote instead of blindly following her just because she wrote a book. How about it? Can you sum it up here and impress everyone with your understanding of Wood's lunacy?

 

Even better;

What is Dr, Judy Wood's hypothesis?

 

Read her book and impress yourself

 

Can you give me a summation of her evidence, and if I find them compelling I will go forth and purchase the book.

In these lean times, I'm a bit hesitant about handing out $45 for abook about which there has only been one review.

What is her hypothesis, and what evidence is it based on?

 

I've read exerpts. Good for a laugh, but not even convincing science fiction. Like I said, only good for the gullible and weak minded suckers unable to think for themselves. She says what truthers want to hear so they flock to her.... right up to the point where they have to try and defend her crap. Then they flee to the next theory someone.... ANYONE.... might believe.

 

Why exactly would I want to buy a book from a PhD in 'lack of common sense'?

 

Are you here to get a commission, or are you here to discuss the content of the book?

What is Dr. Wood's hypothesis? How did she test that hypothesis? Does she have any data at all beyond incredulity and some photographs?

 

WTC-7 was brought down.

 

No, it collapsed due to fire and damage from the collapse of the towers.....

 

What is presented in WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? is not a theory and it is not speculation. It is evidence. It is the body of empirical evidence that must be explained in order to determine what happened on 9/11. I understand your concern over the costs of textbooks. With prices growing at twice the rate of annual inflation, the increasing costs of textbooks are a financial burden to those who wish to broaden their knowledge. The average cost of textbooks for college at four-year public schools was $1,137 for the 2010-2011 school year. I checked Amazon and didn't notice anyone selling a used copy. But if you are a college student, Amazon offers free shipping. Also, if you apply and are approved for an Amazon Rewards Visa Card from Chase the cost of the textbook is reduced to $9.95!

​

Or you could search WorldCat to see if a library near you has a copy. If you are unable to locate one, your local library may participate in the Inter-Library Exchange Program with a library that has a copy available.

http://www.worldcat.org/title/where-did-the-towers-go-evidence-of-directed-free-energy-technology-on-911/oclc/704874500&referer=brief_results

​

 

Thanks for the advertizement, now could you please answer my question?

 

The title of the book is "Where Did the Towers Go? Evidence of Directed Free-energy Technology on 9/11"

Obviously the book is not just data. She claims it's evidence of something. It's right in the title of the book. She didn't just present data, she formed conclusions about that data. Do you want to discuss them, or are you just here to sell the book?

Let's start with; what is her hypothesis and how did she test that hypothesis?

 

I'm not. If you recall, I said:

So, can you offer a summation of her evidence? Would you like to discuss the book, or are you only here to sell it?

 

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYDxCazAQTU&feature=related"]Jim Fetzer&#39;s bizarre phone call to Judy Wood. (part 1 of 2) - YouTube[/ame]

Another truther arguing with Judy about whether she has a theory or not.

This is always good for a laugh too. I posted it before, but it sure does underscore just how unscientific this woman really is.

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJZrj0leylc&feature=related"]Dr Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr Dr. Judy Wood UNEDITED Part 1 - YouTube[/ame]

 

I gathered she was unscientific when she started claiming dust kicked up by first responders and firefighters feet was 'fuming'...

 

If you are serious about discussing the evidence Dr. Judy Wood presents in her textbook it would be more productive if you had a copy that you could refer to. Remember that “Empirical evidence is the truth theory must mimic.” The textbook title does not read WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? The Theory of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11. The title of Dr. Judy Wood's textbook is WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO? Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11. If you pull out a tape measure and run it from the base of a man's erect penis to the tip and find it lines up with 10 1/2 inches that is evidence that the man's penis is over 10 inches long. No theory is needed. No speculation is needed. Consider the National Institute of Standards and Technology’s model of the World Trade Center demise. It certainly didn’t mimic reality, so we know their theory is not correct. You previously expressed concern about the price of this textbook and since I have no knowledge of your net asset value you may be making a valid point. For all I know you could be homeless and using a coffee shop for your Internet access. However, there are some textbook sellers who believe that the textbook's price of $39.95 is a bargain because they are selling copies for 6 to 4 times the price.

http://www.bookbyte.com/textbooks/where-did-the-towers-go-evidence/9780615412566-0615412564


[ame="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0615412564/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&m=A2QR6UE79QRM6H"]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0615412564/ref=ox_sc_act_title_1?ie=UTF8&m=A2QR6UE79QRM6H[/ame]


[ame="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0615412564/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&m=ASYDZOX0HKBSE"]http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0615412564/ref=ox_sc_act_title_2?ie=UTF8&m=ASYDZOX0HKBSE[/ame]​

 

Death rays?

Ha.

Just when I thought the conspiracy theories could not become any more ridiculous.