Dude .. you been reduced to posting emojis .. rolling on the floor laughing .. slobbering on yourself.
Of course I provide support for my claims - but that is irrelevant as we are discussing your claim -- "Risks of harm from Long Omicron far greater than the Vax for healthy people" cum on now mate .. support your claim .. stead of trying to deflect from the fact that you know not what you are talking about.
This is the kind of decision you support? "A decision made with "a lot of love." https://www.lifenews.com/2022/04/18...prompted-her-to-kill-her-baby-in-an-abortion/ Democrat Says She Killed Her Baby in Abortion to “Save the Planet” Democrat congressional candidate Alexandra Hunt recently admitted she had an abortion at age 18 because she did not want to bring a baby into a world with a “climate emergency” crisis. Hunt, who is running for a U.S. House seat in Pennsylvania, pointed to the environment and other “crises” to justify her decision to abort her unborn baby, Fox News reports. She is challenging incumbent U.S. Rep. Dwight Evans, a Philadelphia-area Democrat, in the primary election. Hunt said she was 18 at the time of her abortion, and she became pregnant while using birth control. She also criticized pro-life Republicans for advancing legislation to protect unborn babies, saying her abortion “was made with a lot of love.” “Having an abortion enabled me to progress in my career, cut ties in an abusive relationship, and get to a place of economic security so I can properly care for my future children when I’m ready to become a mother,” she wrote on Twitter in December. Hunt also has faced criticism for admitting that she worked part-time as a stripper in college, according to the report. Rather than being ashamed of her past, however, she has promoted it openly, including by selling campaign T-shirts that read “Elect Hoes” and “I may have danced for money but I’m no corporate whore.”
If you had thought they were, you would have said so. It is quite clear that your unequivocal "abortion is murdrr" is one that shows an utter lack of understanding of the issue. You are happy for women to be denied human rights ensured in your declaration of independence, that you are quite happy for men to escape any responsibility for the situation, assume women will bear all that responsibility with never a thought that men should be forced to contribute, that you have no idea what women experience during pregnancy, and that your insistence on the sanctity of life is limited to one situation while you ignore others. In short, you don't know what you are talking about and are happy to operate in a self contradictory frame. Commonly called hypocrisy. And you can't defend it. So what we have here ladies and gentlemen is a misogynistic hypocrite. And as such, should be ignored.
Then why post a right wing "expose" of a woman who had the "temerity" to exercise her freedom of choice and strongly suggest that she is unsuitable as a political candidate because she is , in your judgement, an immoral person? If that isn't using words to smear, oppression or cause damage to someone, I cant think of a better example of yours. And if you think words don't incite violence, you skipped all your history classes.
If you're against that it supports what seems like your lack of concern for WOMEN'S lives. Don't like women being able to "" : progress in my career, cut ties in an abusive relationship, and get to a place of economic security so I can properly care for my future children when I’m ready to become a mother,”"" ???? Hunt's only mistake is thinking she had to "justify" her abortion, NO woman does. But as to the rest : GOOD FOR HUNT AN HONEST POLITICIAN WHO ISN'T HIDING HER PAST AND KNOWS REAL LIFE.
You must consider women to be weak, fragile little things who need safe spaces with puppies and fluffy toys to protect them from mean words. Not a flattering image.
Then you can't read. I want women to have open space to make her own decisions and that others have no access to tell her what she has to do. That she is free to make her own life in her own way, just as men do when they don't have to take responsibility for the pregnancy. What you want is overt gender discrimination. Which is illegal.
ISTM you need to learn to read. WHO is free of all criticism and yet feels he has the right to tell women what they can and cannot do with their own lives according to their own consciences? What you want is judgemental men removing womens equal rights, and never holding men to the same standard. I am fed up wirh your floundering evasive replies. You can't defend any of your hypocrisy either about protecting life or holding "parents" to equal account. Go look in the mirror and ask God if he likes the hypocrite looking back at you.
Except, you did not refute this: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...l-goes-too-far.598652/page-13#post-1073378798
Except, you did not refute this: http://www.politicalforum.com/index...l-goes-too-far.598652/page-24#post-1073384951
Would they be the only illegal abortion option? No, a dangerous back ally abortion would be a terrible option.