Ex-CIA agent claims there was controlled demolition on 9-11

Discussion in '9/11' started by Stndown, Jun 16, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
  2. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    she has no actual evidence, just baseless and bigoted speculation.
     
  3. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Rumsfeld's testimony confirms HE ALSO lied about 9-11 here: http://www.demonews.org/new-tapes-donald-rumsfeld-lies-about-911and-saddam-hussein/

    Are his words just 'baseless and bigoted speculation' as well? Once again, the defense of lies is embraced by those that embrace them (for some strange reason).

    The lengths that some go to in order to avoid admitting the truth is astonishing.
     
  4. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,678
    Trophy Points:
    113
    its amazing how far and for how long folks will go to deny the truth about 9-11.

    It was done by Al Qaeda, and apparently funded by Saudi Arabia.
     
  5. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The truth has never been told publicly, to the public. That's the problem. Everybody else is somehow lying, and the Kean boys release of disinformation is to be hailed, no matter what. The ignorance continues to be spread.

    More confirmation the government has been lying here:http://www.lewrockwell.com/2014/03/gary-north/of-course-the-government-is-lying-about-9-11/
     
  6. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You people with believe any nutter story, how sad.

    This is your CIA "Agent"

    SHE'S A NUT!
     
  7. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I might be half interested if she had actually worked for the CIA. Seeing she has not I see no reason to give weight to her claims
     
  8. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    See "She's a Nut!"

    ;-)
     
  9. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I was being polite :)
     
  10. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Exactly how does one explain the total destruction of WTC 1,2 & 7
    in as short a time as was done and with total destruction of all three skyscrapers,
    could it be .... CONTROLLED DEMOLITION ?
     
  11. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Flying aircraft into two of the buildings, then let them fall on the third building
     
  12. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So from the chaotic damage caused by an airliner crash, this then is cause
    for the very same result as one expects to get from a very carefully engineered event
    ( That is CD) right?
     
  13. Wizard From Oz

    Wizard From Oz Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2008
    Messages:
    9,676
    Likes Received:
    62
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would much rather you tell me what should have happened if planes hit the two buildings. Everyone is quick to tell me the collapse looked like controlled demolition but in 10 or so years. Not one truther has ever told me what the collapse should have looked like planes hit the buildings
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Logical fallacy again: it was not the very same result as you would get with CD. You keep repeating this ignorant lie as if you hope it will come true if you spew it enough.
    It won't.
     
  15. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What other events ( other than very improbable things )
    cause the complete & total destruction of a skyscraper?
    The airliner crash would have to count as chaotic damage
    and from that we get the coherent result of total destruction of the building?
     
  16. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Plus the many fires it ignited simultaneously across multiple floors.
    Yes, that'll do it.
     
  17. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    still an assertion that chaotic damage = coherent "collapse"
    like that is going to happen.
     
  18. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yet the calculations and physics have shown it to be true. Ready to get back to the thread topic or will you continue to derail?
     
  19. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What do you have ROOSD theory? or? how do you get every nut&bolt/weld/rivet (etc... )
    to fail exactly on time in sequence to produce the observed result?
     
  20. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They didn't: that's a truther fallacy.
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Then how do you get the result as observed?
    if the bits of the building did not fail in sequence,
    then the falling bit had the opportunity to tip, and
    in so doing would create its own progressive event
    down one side of the building leaving the building
    damaged but not destroyed.
    It would have to be, that all of the connections
    within the building failed on-time and in sequence
    to produce the result.
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Not at all: gravity and Newton's laws were quite sufficient.
     
  23. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you embrace the ROOSD theory of how the towers fell?

    note that if one bit of the tower were to give way before all other
    bits on the same horizontal plane, the "collapse" event would tip
    off center and thereby impose greater strain on the structure on
    that side of the building therefore contributing to a progressive failure
    that would have the whole thing tipping to eventually dump the mass
    of rubble over the side of the tower and thereby stopping the action.
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show through mathematical example how this is possible.

    Hint: it isn't.
     
  25. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    you say "it isn't" isn't what? what are you dissing here.

    the reasoning is sound and doesn't need tons of math to prove.
    the fact is that the building collapse as observed on 9/11
    had to have the mass of rubble maintain level, or the whole
    thing would tip, and in tipping, the mass would apply greater
    stress to the lower side and progressively get lower until the
    whole mass of rubble above dumped over the side of the tower
    and thus stopped the action. its LOGIC & REASONING.
     

Share This Page