Ex-CIA agent claims there was controlled demolition on 9-11

She was a CIA asset turned whistle blower, then they held her for years without any trial (here in America), then quietly dropped the charges. Interesting read about here here:
http://www.gaiamtv.com/video/cia-whistleblower-susan-lindauer

Everybody else is lying but the government is telling the absolute truth. How ridiculously gullible.

 

Anyone that uses common sense to determine that the 'official' story can't possibly be true, is a nut. Deep thought going on there, for sure.

 

As an adult, I do not 'diss' anything.

The science takes math as evidence. Math trumps 'common sense'.

- - - Updated - - -

She was not an agent. Why couldn't you simply tell the truth in your title? Unable?

 

'UFO coverups' and 'lost civilizations' boss?

 

Yeaup!...just another one of their "experts" deeply rooted in reality.

 

FOCUS
Pinky
FOCUS
.................. we are not talking about "UFOs" we are discussing the reasons why
its simply not possible for the events of 9/11/2001 to be exactly as described by
the mainstream media.

 

Agent, not agents, and not only that, only presented by a conspiracy theorist journalist with no proof. The gal is a nut.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Lindauer

 

Did you know that the old USSR, would put dissidents in mental institutions
to silence them? Think about it.

 

Nobody put her in a mental institution but thanks for defending another nut case conspiracy theorist without any proof.

 

The link shows no evidence that this woman actually worked for the CIA. It seems doubtful that she did. The link does however show that she was in court for one reason or another and was ordered to undergo psychiatric evaluation because she seemed a little nuts to the judge.

That might have been your first clue but clearly you ignored it.

The fact is even CIA agents are not experts in demolition very few agents are likely to be trained in such skills.

The reason it is difficult to believe is that it is illogical and lacking in any evidence to support it

 

Since the tactic was invented, there have been revisions, anybody who does
not support what is considered "normal" is isolated by labeling them and
invoking a bias against anything that one of the "not normal" people states.
If I told you that there is sand at the beach, you would have to go check for
yourself, because the statement came from someone already labeled nuts.

 

So now there is a conspiracy against nutters. Got it. LOL

 

Have you ever heard of the classroom experiment
where the teacher told the kids "brown eyed kids are smarter than others"
fascinating stuff! food for thought,
no?

 

LOL, whatever dude. Nutters are smarter than others. There you go, now people will believe you.

 

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/divided/

if not enlightened at least become educated ......

 

LOL, I have already laid the groundwork for your recovery from in-consequence using your study. Live large dude.

 

Did you look at the link? anyhow, whatever the status of the ex-agent of whatever,
the fact remains that the towers & 7 were destroyed by controlled demolition.
if you insist on not seeing it, that is your problem.

 

A nutter claim does not the truth make.

 

so if I told you there is sand at the beach, this then would automatically be NOT true
because a "nutter" said it?

 

Another logical fallacy. Why am I not surprised.

 

Please explain "logical fallacy"

whats up with that?

 

Physics, now logical fallacy. Is there no end to your "understanding"? LOL

 

in the real world there are no "bad" questions.

I am the one seeking information here and you give me rudeness for an "answer"
go figure.......

your assumption that my education in physics is deficient, is totally unfounded.

 

Well, your 'education' in physics is certainly not on display.

 

that is entirely a matter of opinion, I really wish Don Herbert was still with us to weigh in on this subject. that would be most interesting.