Ex-CIA agent claims there was controlled demolition on 9-11

You don't think it's possible that the military could add 'other' agents to it and make it an explosive? Why is that?

 

Why exactly would they make an explosive,when they already have explosiveslike C-4,semtex,RDX and primacord?

 

To hide culpability or responsibility? Various 'black operations'? Any number of 'classified' reasons.

 

Oh bull (*)(*)(*)(*),you're just makling stuff up now

 

Okay.
So, they would have no need to hide culpability or responsibility. Never have, and never would.
Back ops don't exist either. Everything is exactly as the government tells us that it is. Whatever bro.

 

Oh please,that's NOT what I said...and again why would they try to make an incendiary an explosive when they have explosives that do the job better?

no 'black ops' or 'classified' excuse

 

The explosive feature of thermitic cutter charges
may be simply an unintended consequence.
maybe like when a 4th of July rocket, blows up
before going anywhere..... oops. * happens.....

whatever .......

 

I can't help you refuse to accept anything that you don't believe. Black ops are a real thing. 'Classified' was touted throughout the Bush dictatorship. Both are quite real. Once again, to escape culpability. Too many 'coincidences' for me to swallow that it was just all innocent failure, and that cave dwellers did the deed. That, and the military being 'out to lunch' the entire time, and those pesky simulations running concurrently are enough to make me suspicious that something isn't as we were told. Easy jump, really.

 

So Arabic Muslims are now "Cave dwellers"?

Shame on you for using such tasteless bigotry and racism. Are all truthers this hate filled?

 

Pot meet kettle.

 

So much fail in your post..

 

Black ops exist. Bush blowed. Everything was 'classified' with him. There were live exercises 'simulation' planes crashing into buildings when the real thing was happening. Lots of strange 'coincidences' occurred, telling us that cave dwellers did it. There were inaccuracies and endless 'inconsistencies' throughout the 'official' presentation.
Where does the post 'fail' (so much)?

 

Considering it's 100% YOUR opinion,it fails at all levels.

 

So, you're just filling the role of the attacker.

 

I'm not attacking,just relating the facts.

Whining again,boss?

 

it really doesn't take an authority figure ( ex CIA agent ...... or?)
to understand the facts here,
The NIST used the term "total collapse" they did not say
something less than total collapse, they said TOTAL COLLAPSE
and this can then be taken to mean total destruction of the tower(s)
with that said, note that the event, that is total destruction of the tower(s)
is the very same result from Controlled Demolition and indeed if you
examine the record of controlled demolitions gone wrong, the outcome
of said controlled demolition gone wrong is incomplete demolition.
therefore, complete demolition is a controlled demolition gone right.
so how is it that chaotic damage & fires, caused the very same result
as does weeks of careful planning and set-up for a controlled demolition?

 

Running interference. I got it.

 

Who are you running interference for, Boss?

 

may I point out the fact that there is INFORMATION
that everybody has access to and is considerable in
the constructing a foundation under the argument that
the events of 9/11/2001 were not because angry Arabs
hijacked some airliners. Note that the destruction of
WTC1,2 & 7 was complete, just as in CD, and the
debunker crew would like us to believe that the events
of 9/11/2001 were NOTHING at all like CD, however,
in several significant respects, the destruction of WTC1,2 &7
parallel CD very closely.

This is something that does not require special training
or expertise in, its available to anybody who didn't sleep
through science 101.

 

It is certainly frightening information that an Ex-CIA agent is releasing.