was there an expert that testified or stated what you just said or is that just a quote from the same link you posted? As a casual observer it would be nice to know where the expertise is in these statements.
The evidence is clear, in the case of the alleged "FLT175" the aircraft was said to have penetrated the WTC south wall of the South Tower without any perceivable deceleration ( WHAT? ) and the towers collapse was said to have collapsed strictly as a function of a gravity powered event with the building mass falling in on itself and causing complete & total destruction all the way down to ground level for both towers, and this is not to be considered VERY strange? and WTC7 falling for 2.25 sec at free fall acceleration ..... whats up with that? We have all we need to conclude that the official story is completely bogus, you can go about seeking bigger and better evidence if you like, but the case is closed as far as I can see.
I haven't seen any evidence yet (I still going through the link you gave me) All I have seen on this forum is mostly "because I said so" I would politely disagree with the "We have all we need to conclude" because I still don't know who we is....I have seen lots of other truthers who disagree vehemently with what you say about the planes with just as much proof as you have. This makes me as a casual observer quite suspicious of what is being stated. Thanks
please read up on the laws of physics and ask the question why should an airliner not show visible slowing down upon striking a steel box column wall? The WTC tower wall would have offered up significant resistance.
How much? calculate the force of the moving object versus the impact surface. Show your work and why it couldn't happen.
here is a clue for you, the MSM & our "leaders" first asserted the hijacked airliners theory with NO math, NO plausibility or probability that it was even possible to fly airliners into skyscrapers and do what was alleged to have been done. therefore the burden of PROOF is on the MSM & our "leaders" who so far have produced NOTHING that supports the allegation that airliners were used as weapons.
Its a very simple thing to cite the Boeing web page where they specify the max speed of the airliners at 35,000 ft therefore attempting to operate said airliner at 590 mph and at < 1000 ft altitude is out-of-the-question! There are so many things about the alleged attack using hijacked airliners as weapons that absolutely doesn't work at all, and yet it is allegedly attributed to "incredulity" when people with proper common sense reject the official fairy tale.
So you still believe that 150 mph over max "safe" speed is not only doable, but the aircraft would respond to control such that the hijackers had any chance at all of achieving their goal? .... or?
the cruising speed of a 767 is 530MPH,590 is hardly '150' mph over... And they were going straight in,not a whole lot of controlling needed
Quote from the Boeing web-page "Typical Cruise Speed at 35,000 feet " Why do you think they specify 35,000 feet? What, leaving out critical information in an attempt to sell your point?
Why do you think BOEING specified 35,000 ft for that speed? What makes you think that 530 mph at <1000 ft is possible?
and operating an airliner at 590 mph <1000 ft altitude is abnormal. and indeed can not be done. given air resistance, the engines do not produce enough power to propel the aircraft to that speed at low altitude, therefore the people supporting the official fairy tale invented the "power dive" scenario to account for the speed, but that would require extra special flying skills if it could be done at all given potential damage to the aircraft. Also, did the "terrorists" have detailed engineering data on the WTC walls and also the PENTAGON wall? without some data, it would be a matter of launching their attack against a total unknown. Would "FLT77" be able to penetrate the PENTAGON wall or would it bounce off? and indeed with the attack against the twin towers, how did they know that the aircraft would be capable of penetrating the wall? the whole fairy tale about the 19 suicidal hijackers is exactly that, only a fairy tale. The objective of disinformation is not to convince you of one point of view or another, it is to create enough uncertainty so that everything is believable and nothing is knowable. " -- James Fetzer and as for me, I KNOW that no airliners were hijacked on 9/11/2001.
