House oversight chair Comer says ‘6 or 7 Biden family members’ potentially involved in business sche

https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/11/...house-committee-to-obtain-trumps-tax-returns/

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/112222zr_5i26.pdf

that order allowed them to be given to the legislative committee even though Trump argued that his tax returns may be released or leaked. If it didn't concern the Supreme Court then, by de facto, they have also stated it is okay to release them. Otherwise, the ruling would have been worded differently.

 

Actually it does. You are just not reading the law the way it was written, but only the way you think it is written. This is a very common mistake among "amateurs."

 

No...it DOES NOT INCLUDE THE WORDS YOU CLAIM IT DOES...lol

 

But, those rulings didn't make the committee exempt from following the law concerning the public release of Trump's returns.

 

What is the premise of your conclusion that the investigation ended apparently months ago and it was because of this tainted evidence "theory" of yours. They got the original lap top. Who's it is is not being contested even by Hunter.

Yes you should be following that and all the whistleblowers who have come forward. We KNOW they work with social media to suppress the story before the election.

You have yet to refute the evidence with your simple dismissals of it.

 

Yea that's how you prove things. They along with everyone else who has analyzed them has come to the same conclusion. We also have the copies from others which corroborate them. What you got to refute it, can you post me denials by Hunter Biden for instance?

 

So you know of no instance when Hunter Biden has stated the laptop was not his and emails are not his. So what is your basis to not believing it is and they are vis-a-vis all the evidence and analysis and corroborations?

 

I did not say that at all.

 

So then you can explain how Rudy was pushing the FBI to get the laptop from the “repair shop”

1. How did Rudy know it was there ?
2. WHY would the FBI need to be involved in a laptop at a repair shop ?

If Rudy was pushing the FBI to get to the laptop, then we know that Rudy had access to it, AND…the $1,000,000 question: WHY would the FBI need to look at a laptop from a e citizen in privately owned repair shop ?

What “Evidence” are you talking about? What crime was committed by Hunter Biden ?

Please…Tell us all what crime Hunter Biden committed that the FBI should be investigating him and his laptop ?

 

I don't have to explain anything about Rudy, I'm waiting for you to point me to where Hunter Biden or The Big Guy had challenged it's veracity and content. And it is quite clear how anyone seeing the discussions and content would see a reason to go the legal authorities and the national security implications along with the crimes.

 

FFS man, your entire basis for the debate is that you think the “content” being pushed by right wing media is an anyway real. It is very clearly known that the chain of custody here is beyond compromised. But even before that, how did anyone on the right know anything about a laptop in a repair shop in nowhere USA, and then somehow think that that laptop, of a private citizen needed to go to the FBI ?

 

It's widely report in the NYT and WaPo even now. You entire basis for the debate is your simple dismissals of the evidence and corroborations.

 

No, you just cant debate it.

 

Been right here and still waiting for you to present something which proves your baseless assertions the laptop and information on it is fake.

 

what information are you speaking of ?

 

An now the obtuse responses.

 

Again, YOU are making claims of data on the laptop. WHAT data are you referring to ?

 

And again the obtuse response.

 

Yet you never answer it….why is that ?

 

Why are you posting obtuse questions?

 

Waiting for all of this evidence Comer claimed to have while speaking on a Fox show.

 

AGAIN, you keep refusing the simple question for a reason…you know that what I say is true

The “laptop” cannot be trusted because of the chain of custody. You WANT it to be true, but know that whats on the laptop is junk, but its serving its designed purpose which is to gin up the base and keep blood in the water.

 

I've already dispelled your claims thus the obtuse post. You want it to be false but you know it's his data and has been verified and he even admits it with his demands that it is his property and wants it back.

But then that's all you're left with.

 

Nowhere in legal filings does Hunter Biden admit the mythical laptop is his.

 

He sent his lawyer to retrieve it and now says in his counter suit else he would have no lawsuit.

I have been asking for years post where he has stated they are NOT his.