How Biden opposed gay rights for 50 YEARS after his high school 'epiphany' when he saw two men kissi

Hey, DeSantis is just doing what the Majority wants. They do not want perverts dancing sexually in front of young children. They can dance elsewhere without a care in the world. And, the Left invades morality laws all the time with their curriculum. Do you truly think this is all one sided. Both sides fight this battle with their own versions of morality. The Left attempts and sometimes succeed in implementing their own laws on morality.

FYI. Anyone who has a strong desire to dance sexually wearing only a thong in front of young children is a pervert and should be against morality, period. Any parent who thinks it is a good thing for their kids may be a pervert themselves or is just plain brainwashed. I would bet close to 90% of the world would be against it.

 

Review my posts in this thread. These opinions aren’t limited to Dems. If Reps did did more good things I’d care less about their lies.

 

If laws were broken, then enforce the laws through the courts, and if not, then create laws to be enforced. I can tell you do not like that idea, because you want to concentrate all power on one person, - your political idol.

The majority does NOT want the Governor to be the judge and the executioner, because that is a VERY un-American idea.

Your mindset is Stalinist left where all power is concentrated on one person, although authoritarianism exists on both extreme left and extreme right, both of which are strictly anti-freedom. The line "dancing in front of children" in only a weak justification to enact authoritarian BS. Its the old "I am from the government and I am here to help you" line which you promote.

 

What do you think?

I believe the SC constitutionally called it correctly.

 

The SC? Yes, I agree they looked at it from the Constitutional POV as opposed to political agenda POV, so they did the right thing. They should always look at things from Constitutional POV, even if their party has a different POV.

 

Don't they?

 

No, not always, which is why pubic view of the SC has taken a beating


Over the past three years, the share of adults with a favorable view of the court has declined 15 percentage points, according to the new survey, conducted Jan. 10-17 among 5,128 adults on the Center’s American Trends Panel. Looking back further, current views of the court are among the least positive in surveys dating back nearly four decades.
https://www.pewresearch.org/politic...e-negative-before-news-of-breyers-retirement/

 

Favorability seems to have slipped with the Democrats a lot. More than any other group. Can't please all the people all of the time. Elections have consequences.

 

When it comes to the Supreme Court, they should NOT be politically motivated, but you seem to approve of them being political. And contrary to your comment, its not just among Dems, because their approval has dropped among all groups, not just Dems. It has fallen from 85 to 62 among conservatives. It fell 19 points among Dems and 18 among Repubs, so not much difference there.

 

Brandon has been anything but a positive force for America, both throughout his time before and as president. Dems just are quick to forgive other Dems for basically anything lol.

 

If anything goes with you why is it so important to claim your sexual identity? No one asked. Perhaps it is shame.....the fact your inner being knows the difference between right in wrong. You try to go around that shame so you stand with those who are against the tradition of their own parents by which they were conceived. Guess that is the price of being "woke".

 

Exactly! And now they are finding out how he siphoned millions from China into his family coffers. We wonder why things are going backwards in foreign affairs. It's called "pay to play". The Biden Crime Family got paid and China gets to play!

 

I think his boy Wonder Huntard Bydummy has a lot to do with it Whats the nick name for sucking on the glass pipe? Same amount of letters just a different delivery system!!

 

You mentioned heterophobia.

I was trying to calm your fears, and was hoping that by identifying myself as a fellow hetero, that your heterophobiaphobia was unfounded, and you shouldn't worry. You have nothing to fear but your own fear.

 

Thats a very subjective and emotional approach to logic... which might be the issue.

 

I never mentioned my sexual preference. I know it is important to you. Like Biden, you seem to like indoctrinating children to "anything goes" and I assume that would be grooming them for the culture you desire to obtain. In the end, it's just not going to work. Perhaps you are just virtue signalling to the woke, but I would encourage you to overcome your shame and pay attention to that inner voice.

Also, I do not identify by my sexual preference. Sorry you do.

 

Sorry, i assumed that your concern about heterophobia was self-interested.

I never even asked you for your pronouns, i am very sorry. Please don't report me to any woke police.

 

I wonder whose pockets that $3 million went to. Hunter did text or email that he needed another $20k into his account right after the middle man got the money. I wonder if Hunter and Joe paid their taxes for the "Business" they claim it was for. I wonder what business that involved. I am sure much more will be released as they feel safe in releasing to the public. Evidently, word is the White House is fighting very hard to keep this under wraps.

 

Pronouns have nothing to do with it. I know only two he/she. The woke police would be YOUR friends, not mine.

You posted on another thread that you are a Communist. I appreciate that frankness and honesty. Wish Joe could follow that lead. Now I know why you are for "gender confusion". Family is the backbone of Individual liberty, and I am sure you would dismiss it in favor of the "Collective".

 

Think there are more family members than previously known. The bloodhounds are on it!

 

Would you care to explain that assessment?

 

You said "if repubs did more good things..."

Good to who? Who's standards? Who's agenda? Yours?

That's extremely subjective.

And if complying with your standard of good, you then excuse their lies?

That's extremely emotional.

I domt accept anybody lying to me and have a problem with it regardless if I agree with them or not.

That entire approach and ideology is wrong from the start.

 

Yes or No? Do you agree with grown men dancing sexually in front of children? It’s a very simple question? No one has an issue with drag clubs where adults attend. They can be fun and many of the performers are very talented. But they’re sexually charged and explicit. Some more than others. But children? Very different. No laws are preventing adults performing for adults. You live here. We’ve got strip clubs, nude and covered up, gay clubs, comedy clubs, every sort of club. They have age limits.

Why do you want no age limits on drag shows?

 

I agree everyone's viewpoint pretty much has changed over the past 25 yrs or more regarding homosexuality. Years ago it was a taboo for some to many, now it is no big deal.

 

Do you believe that “good” can be measured by an objective standard? I do.

Do you not believe that supporting the rights of a persecuted minority to be objectively good? I do.