How could you kill your own baby ?

I wouldn't kill myself either but if you decide to, I don't care. Matter of fact if you need guidance PM me and I'll give you some ideas utilizing things you may have stored in,or under, your trailer.
Hey.My New Yearz resolution is to be more helpful.

 

Here's another one for you: try to cut down on the hate.

 

This had me laughing all the way to the toilet where I dumped it along with my bowl movement, but lets give you the benefit of the doubt.

Define natural human behavior?

You like everyone else do not adhere to "natural human behavior" .. tell me do you cook your food, do you ride the bus or drive a car, do you live in a house, do you visit the doctor when ill, would you have an operation to save your life .. none of these are "natural human behavior" so before accusing others take a long good look in the mirror. You choose the things that suit your opinions .. a very immature way to debate.

 

Oh the last refuge of a desperate person when defeated lash out at those who show your failings .. pro-life only when it suits.

 

A photo of a naked kid?????


???????

 

It looks very similar inside the womb.

Just remember, many of the pro-aborts want to abort babies in the seventh, eighth, and even ninth month of pregnancy. The tenth month too, if the baby is overdue!

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/h...s-no-different-from-abortion-experts-say.html

I believe Pasithea also told us she supports abortion in the ninth month too, "if the woman feels she needs one for any reason".

 

No, it doesn't.

"""""many of the pro-aborts want to abort babies in the seventh, eighth, and even ninth month of pregnancy"""""


Unsubstantiated hyperbole......as usual.

You sure like photos of very young children........

 

The younger the better.


(this one's not quite viable yet)


You pro-aborts really get off abusing little unborn children, don't you?


btw that's an amniotic sac she has draped over her head

 

OKKKKKKKK....

 

Not really. That baby appears to be 2-3 months old. That looks NOTHING like the embryoes at the time most abortions take place.

Nobody WANTS to abort fetuses at all, but sometimes it's necessary.

There are a multitude of reasons why she might need one, but the fact is that very FEW of abortions occur in the ninth month and you can be sure there is a dire medical need for one that does occur. There are very few late-term abortions in Canada and they have NO LAW. Do you suppose that if there were no law against late term abortions, women would all try to wait until the last minute to abort, just because pregnancy is so much fun they want to prolong the joy?

 

Please don't name drop me unless you are directly addressing me, it's rather rude and makes it hard to defend myself when you don't directly quote me and I get that nice little, "you have been quoted" message.

But yes, I don't believe there should any laws restricting abortion, I do recognize the fact that there are slim to none elective late term abortions though. Abortions before the fetus is literally due to be born are simply a non-issue for choicers. I am not sure why you lifers are so obsessed with them when the vast majority of abortions are occurring in between weeks 6-9.

 

Another reason I would prefer you guys to stop name-dropping me is because you continue to try and speak for me and by doing so you are leaving out very specific points to my opinions that I feel are important and need to remain in context. If it happens again I will be forced to report you and anyone else who does so. Thanks.

 

"KILL AT WILL" should be what we call the pro abortion ("pro-choice") position, because that is what it is in reality!

- - - Updated - - -

are you claiming that you have never done the same to other posters? SERIOUSLY?

 

If we did not have so many wingnuts claiming that embryo's are babies there might be a possibility for more rational discussion of the later stages of pregnancy when the fetus actually resembles and could be considered a baby.

 

Yes, I always assure to quote them so that they may defend themselves. If I have not anywhere on here please let me know.

I am getting tired of seeing users dropping my name around this forum and misquoting me. I noticed that it is happening more and more often too.

 

Well, do you support abortions at nine months, or don't you?
I mean when the woman's life is not seriously and imminently threatened, and it's a normal healthy fetus.

 

Do you support killing newborns with DS or of mixed race, or how about dropping condoms into ethnic areas to stop them having more babies so their population doesn't grow?

 

Yes, they should be put out of their misery, they can never live a normal life, and someone else will have to take care of their daily needs for the rest of their life.

I suppose we could just dump them off in a wild life sanctuary somewhere, but then they would just die a miserable death from starvation. They will NEVER be able to take care of themselves, not at any point in their life. Unlike with an embryo, there is no potential for anything more.

Besides, pro-aborts have no problem killing DS babies in late-term abortions. The only difference is that I don't believe being inside or outside of a womb makes any difference.

never said I supported killing newborns of mixed race, I don't know how you come up with such exaggerations

Sure would prevent a lot of abortions, wouldn't it?

 

No need for me to add anything to this, it speaks for itself

Would you like me to go and find where you do say it and quote it here?

Again no need for anything added, pretty much shows you for the supremacist you are.

 

"""""I suppose we could just dump them off in a wild life sanctuary somewhere, """"


As if there wasn't enough proof here is aboslute proof that being kind to "babies", treating them as humans, treating them as 'precious gifts, is NOT your anti-abortion agenda..

 

It's not murder, it's a MERCY KILLING.
Yes, there do actually exist a few acceptable reasons for a mother to have her baby killed. Her convenience and career aspirations are not one of them.

 

I believe it is ideal to have no laws on abortion whatsoever, however I also acknowledge the fact that no women, even in places where abortion is legal in all trimesters, are choosing abortion in the late term for elective reasons. So late term abortions, which account for 1% of all abortions and are done for medical reasons is really a non-issue for me and many choicers and even for some lifers because most of you, well I hope most you, don't wish to deny women life saving abortions.

 

In 1988, the majority (~ 90%) of women got late second trimester abortions for elective reasons. Do you really think things have changed all that much since then?

It's quite a bit more than 1% !

repeating the blatent lie once again, are we?

You know as well as I do that there are no reliable statistics on this, and Planned Parenthood wants to keep it that way.

 

First of all what do you consider "late second trimester abortions" and third of all please post your source and then post a source for the recent numbers of "late second trimester abortions".

Well when you're counting second trimester abortions, which are not late term, THIRD TRIMESTER is, then yes your numbers will be a bit different.

Would you like me to provide proof of my claims or are you just going to dismiss Guttmacher like every other lifer here?