I am a good person and I don't need a god for that

I’m joking around dude. Chill. Did you watch the video? The ASL interpreter is rocking out with an air guitar.

 

Relativity indicates that photos do not "experience" the passage of time. So why would they have a creator? And, no, light and energy are not the same thing.

 

Yes, and I responded to it.

 

You're mistaken.

https://www.snexplores.org/article/understanding-light-and-other-forms-of-energy-on-the-move

 

That doesn't actually address what I said. And light is both a wave AND a particle. Are you still denying relativity?

 

I'm denying you know what you're talking about.

 

. . . this is literally Physics 101. Literally. I'm sorry you think you know more about physics than Nobel Prize winning physicists and . . . well, all other ****ing physicists, but you don't. Unlike you, however, these people are willing and able to discuss evidence.

Even taking 5 minutes to look up the double slit experiment would show you this.

 

You managed to spell it correctly this time.

I gave you a link explaining (scientifically) what light is -- a form of energy - which you initially disputed. You're not winning this argument by deflecting from it with flamebait.

 

Please quote where that article says that light is not also a particle. And I never argued that light isn't energy. I said that light and energy are not the same thing. Light is both a wave and a particle. That discovery is what lead to the other physics discoveries that you refuse to discuss.

 

Enjoy the rest of your day. My quota of reading deflections are filled.

 

I'm sorry if you think that science is a "deflection," but I appreciate your confirmation that you are unwilling to discuss the facts.

 

Your "inference" is to go to magical thinking? We couldn't explain thunder so Thor must be riding his chariot across the sky? It's science.

 

If much of what we observe today couldn't be explained by causes you might have a point. Thunder has a cause which we have always been able to observe. Again, name one thing in our universe that was uncaused?

 

Name one part of an airplane that can fly on its own.

 

Energy

 

I'll even add, since Overitall equates light with energy: photons. Given relativity, there is no such thing as past, present, and future from the point of view of a photon, so how could it require a cause?

 

What type of energy?

 

The type that constitutes is referenced by Special Relativity.

 

I've tried to get him to acknowledge relativity. No luck so far.

 

You can lead a horse to water….

 

I'm aware of 14 types of energy, all having causes. You tossed out a reference to "Special Relativity" as if that's an answer to my question. It's not.

 

Why should I drink water that has turds in it?

 

I can help you if you deficare in your water.

 

That sentence reminds me of the Big bang.

 

So which of you types are potential energy and which kinetic"?