Immigration

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Mamluke13, Jul 7, 2018.

  1. Bridget

    Bridget Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2017
    Messages:
    2,264
    Likes Received:
    1,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe we don't have a serious space problem yet. But we are definitely getting more crowded; it doesn't take a genius to see that. But let's say we have plenty of room right now, to spread out, to have privacy, yadayada. Why would we want to make it worse? Why would we want to be like Bangladesh?? Do we want migrants living in our state and national parks? Because if you think our big cities aren't too crowded, open your eyes. So, where are we going to put millions and millions more people, all entering at the same time?
     
  2. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Show proof of their necessity.
     
  3. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one said necessity. Show the necessity of turning them away. I'm sure we are coming from completely different philosophical groundings here: libertarianism (if you want to stop someone from doing something, prove your intervention is necessary) vs authoritarianism (prove liberty is necessary, otherwise the presumption is government intervention).
     
  4. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They aren't needed by the American society and would simply be a burden on the society at large. Nice attempt at turn around, but you haven't proven their need in our society, so why should we allow them to enter?
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
  5. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Proof of the later claim? The majority of economists disagree.
     
    Last edited: Jul 11, 2018
  6. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You haven't shown proof of their necessity yet.
     
  7. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Necessity wasn't my claim. Try again. Then see if you can come up with proof of your claim.
     
  8. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    All ideology needs to tempered by practicality. We can't allow everyone who isn't a crook or thug to come here who can book passage. I saw a survey that said 50m people want to immigrate to Canada. Geez, what if it's even 100m for this country?
     
  9. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The world is a different place than it was 100 years ago.
    [​IMG]
     
  10. Mac-7

    Mac-7 Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    86,664
    Likes Received:
    17,636
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ok I’ll to remember that in the future
     
  11. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Trump doesn't keep his word.
     
  12. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes. And?
     
  13. Lil Mike

    Lil Mike Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2011
    Messages:
    51,851
    Likes Received:
    23,091
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But your claim was that there was no offer. Now you seem to be conceding that there was an offer, but Trump will break his agreement anyway...so you are saying that Democrats should never deal with Trump on any issue ever?
     
  14. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There are seven times as many people. We can't take a big fraction of them.
     
  15. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why? We aren't even close to the population density of the countries where overpopulation is an actual problem. Not by a long shot
     
  16. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Correct. Any offer from Trump would have to be clearly outlined in writing.
    Trump's verbal offers aren't really offers.

    If I was a Democrat leader, I'd say that "we're waiting for something in writing."
     
  17. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I remember what Los Angeles was like in the 1950s and it's decidedly unpleasant by comparison today. We don't need to be like the UK where 60m people are crowded into a small country. I don't think Americans want to be jammed together like the Brits.
     
  18. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Longing memories of the 50s are a poor excuse to limit liberty.
     
  19. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then why should the be here?
     
  20. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Immigrants are economically beneficial. Even if they weren't, as long as they are economically neutral/not economically damaging, there is no excuse for barring them. They should be here as long as there is no good reason to prevent them from being here.
     
  21. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    There's no reason other than our desire to do so to allow non-citizens into the country. The country belongs to U.S. citizens, period.
     
    Mac-7 likes this.
  22. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And basic reason. There is no reason to deny non-criminal, hard-working people entry except for knee-jerk and completely irrational xenophobia.

    Including the children of immigrants and including naturalized citizens.
     
  23. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Often they are, sometimes they're not.
    They might be socially damaging. Why should we allow racists or misogynists into the country?
    That we may not want them here is reason enough.
     
  24. yardmeat

    yardmeat Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2010
    Messages:
    58,011
    Likes Received:
    31,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    More often than that, they are.

    So now it is about thought crimes?

    AKA irrational xenophobia. Good reasons are reason enough. Bad reasons are irrational.
     
  25. LangleyMan

    LangleyMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2017
    Messages:
    45,102
    Likes Received:
    12,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How do we know they're "hard-working?"

    Anyway, I think setting limits to the numbers of immigrants is a good idea because it costs money to properly integrate them into our society (language lessons, housing, financial help), a concern by some citizens they're competing for their jobs, and a consensus that we don't want to add to many people to our population.
    If they're citizens, yes. If they aren't citizens, no. Citizenship is the ticket to the club.
     

Share This Page