Ingraham and Fox take on Bill Gates

Discussion in 'Coronavirus Pandemic Discussions' started by clovisIII, May 4, 2020.

PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening. We urge you to seek reliable alternate sources to verify information you read in this forum.

  1. Jacob E Mack

    Jacob E Mack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2019
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Issues with quoting, but I made my point.
     
  2. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    60,026
    Likes Received:
    16,493
    Trophy Points:
    113
    What will save lives in the future is for countries to do a better job of being prepared to face pandemic.

    An investigation of China isn't going to fix China any more than an investigation of Trump is going to fix Trump. That is, zero.

    What MIGHT help with China is for us to have stronger communication and mutual cooperation with the lab at Wuhan. And, some big investigation of China is absolutely NOT going to help with that. We need China to see value in that communication/cooperation.

    Also, there are plenty of places for a pandemic to come from, as we've seen many times.
     
    Last edited: May 7, 2020
  3. Jacob E Mack

    Jacob E Mack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2019
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    The investigation will help prepare for the next pandemic and that's the point.
     
  4. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,846
    Likes Received:
    11,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LOL, I had a feeling you were not quite as curious and academic as you thought you were.

    Does cognitive dissonance rule academia?
     
  5. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,846
    Likes Received:
    11,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Then why was Anthony talking about it in 2017 or so?
     
  6. Jacob E Mack

    Jacob E Mack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2019
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Dr. Fauci discusses potential risks and the likelihood of an outbreak based upon his research and expertise.
     
  7. Jacob E Mack

    Jacob E Mack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2019
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    No. This is just a conspiracy claim 100% disproven.
     
  8. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    22,846
    Likes Received:
    11,833
    Trophy Points:
    113
    C'mon Jacob, you won't even watch Pommer's presentation because you're afraid it would prove you wrong.

    In the early days I believed Fauci, now I see him as a partisan fear monger, because that is all he has done is scare people into acting irrationally, a fairly easy thing to do.

    He may be an expert, but he is also a fear monger and the record shows it.

    He was the spark that started the stampede of the herd.
     
  9. Jacob E Mack

    Jacob E Mack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2019
    Messages:
    1,344
    Likes Received:
    356
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    I watched it. I have expertise that enables me to judge these claims. Actual training and background. It's not about belief.
     

Share This Page