I'm confused. You're saying you posted it because you were trying to lie? Let's see if I can figure this logic of yours out. The government was warned by EVERYONE that terrorists were going to attack. Therefor it wasn't terrorists that committed the attack? Nope. I can't figure that logic out.
You posted it. Do you not believe what you post? In the same post you said: So you weren't claiming the quote from TV was false. You are now trying to duck your own postings. Why is that?
No I am claiming that it can be found on nbc, the point being that they were told. (MS-NBC interview, Sept., 15, 2001). The point that the russians told the gub is enough. method is irrelevant. Its the alert that counts.
So the government wasn't responsible, just incompetent is what you're saying. They didn't listen to Russia's intel. You need to choose one theory and stick to it. You're confusing yourself with all the spin you're generating.
No, that seems to be why Jojo is saying. Hard to tell though, he's trying to change the meaning of his posts.
Is that why you have no idea what you're talking about? I don't think you have any clue at all how your quote that the Russians warned the U.S. of trained terrorist pilots fits in with your theory. I think you posted it because at the time you thought it made the government look bad. When it was pointed out that the Russian warning was just another piece of evidence in support of the reality that planes were hijacked and crashed into the buildings you suddenly had to pretend it was a lie. Then you realized that if it was a lie your premise that the government didn't act on warnings falls apart, so now it's a lie that's true...or something. The truth shouldn't be this hard, Koko.
the government has both a fiduciary responsibility and as a trustee to protect this country. Incompetent is not a defense for breach of either. It sounds like you want to duck under incompetent as some kind of excuse exhonerating them for criminal breach. I am not the one that misunderstood the theory you are. Now you want to claim you know better than me the theory put out than I the creator of the thread. Do tell.
Based on what you've posted, you believe Islamic terrorists hijacked planes and flew them into buildings.
the government has both a fiduciary responsibility and as a trustee to protect this country. Incompetent is not a defense for breach of either. It sounds like you want to duck under incompetent as some kind of excuse exhonerating them for criminal breach. I didnt see anything referencing the above.
They certainly do. Tragically, some religious fanatics listened to their invisible friend and exploited weaknesses in the security. The government played a lot of CYA after the fact. I exonerate no one, but the powers that be aren't psychics. We were caught with our pants down, so to speak.
yes we fully understand that you continue to highlight not what my point is but what you want my point to be.
CNN's own footage shows the nose popping out the other side...aluminum....versus steel, and aluminum wins every time. Super tough, those aluminum nosecones. They should have used those on the space shuttles. Cheaper, more durable.
Religious fanatics? Which government organization again? Yeh they really should do a better job compartmentalizing their internal affairs dont you think? Sure you do. Its their duty to have their pants up. Pants down is not a defense for breach but admission to it.
Want a realy good laugh? the nosecones are a fiberglass compound that literally shatters even when a bird hits it. the radar is in the nose. Even a freakin sparrow will put a 2+ foot crack in them so they have to be changed out LOLOLOLL my personal favorite though is the one they showed on faux where they fllmed a bird, a bird goes in and a plane comes out LMAO and it explodes out the side first instead of the entry point. I mean the graphics screw ups are really hilarious if were not such a tragedy.
