Is Roe v. Wade at Risk???

No, but I never claimed I did.

I HAVE read about it though to learn what different women feel......

 

Did I say I discussed it with every woman? No I didn't. And obviously you don't know either. You know, it's **** you ought to know when you tango in the bedroom. Or else you get stupid excuses for why it's so damn hard for this or cost to much for that...like contraception....

BUT it seems like abortions are damn affordable.

 

You did say "" In all my life,""

Did you have a point ? Other than to trash women?

 

So that's a no then?

 

Because that kid is born and thus have its own right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness (duuuuuuh).

Geez. I thoguht you Conservatives were supposed to be friends of the foudning documents and individual rights, why is this so hard to get?

 

Sure, sorry for the typos. Posted from my phone on the bus.

What I meant to say was that; You do realise what you said is an argument for the right to abort, right?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Yes, maybe but for most women, they have an abortion and give off a big sigh of relief.....


They say "my baby" because they are not in a debate, not using scientific facts to prove a point ...

It isn't "in fact" a baby...it is a FETUS IN FACT AND SCIENCE AND REAL LIFE.

It is no more a "baby" than it is a teenager or adult or toddler...WHY CALL it a baby, why not an adult? That's what it will be SOMEDAY...

English language: Has different words for different things....for a REASON....



WHO is "lying to themselves"?

Anti-Choicers who really know it isn't a Gerber Baby but a ZEF that gets aborted?

Ya, I suppose they have to lie if they want to destroy women's rights...but I doubt their conscience bothers them on that score..






Have you ever NOT evaded addressing posts you quote? I mean the actual CONTENT of the post?

...without a segue to an unrelated topic???

If you have to use your imagination, make up things and claim others said them, and can't address posts you quote it shows clearly you have no argument.

 

Thought so.

 

Yes, you did.

 

I have and she was devastated.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
I NEVER said either childbirth or motherhood were slavery.....

Only in your twisted " interpretation"

You haven't shown where I said what you claim...

 

And what has that got to do with whether abortion should be legal or not? Nothing.

 

Me too

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Yes, maybe but for most women, they have an abortion and give off a big sigh of relief.....


They say "my baby" because they are not in a debate, not using scientific facts to prove a point ...

It isn't "in fact" a baby...it is a FETUS IN FACT AND SCIENCE AND REAL LIFE.

It is no more a "baby" than it is a teenager or adult or toddler...WHY CALL it a baby, why not an adult? That's what it will be SOMEDAY...

English language: Has different words for different things....for a REASON....



WHO is "lying to themselves"?

Anti-Choicers who really know it isn't a Gerber Baby but a ZEF that gets aborted?

Ya, I suppose they have to lie if they want to destroy women's rights...but I doubt their conscience bothers them on that score..

Have you ever NOT evaded addressing posts you quote? I mean the actual CONTENT of the post?

...without a segue to an unrelated topic???






If you have to use your imagination, make up things and claim others said them, and can't address posts you quote it shows clearly you have no argument.

Have you ever NOT evaded addressing posts you quote? I mean the actual CONTENT of the post?

...without a segue to an unrelated topic???






If you have to use your imagination, make up things and claim others said them, and can't address posts you quote it shows clearly you have no argument.



I KNOW so...

 

And what has that got to do with whether abortion should be legal or not? Nothing.

 

Of course she was. But, it is important not to drop context and conflate miscarriage with abortion. She was devestated following her miscarriage because she wanted to become a mother. Women who choose abortion do not want motherhood.

 

Separation of Church and State, bruv. Simple as that.

 

Abortion is an induced miscarriage and both involve the death of the baby.

 

The separation of church and state is irrelevant to this issue.


Plus, show me in the US constitution where the phrase "separation of church and state" is located?


Government is responsible for maintaining our religious liberties. That puts a direct link between the church and state.

 

An induced violent miscarriage. A baby is usually not physically torn apart during a miscarriage.

 

Then they should do a better job of avoiding the pregnancy.

 

They both end up dead and the emotional damage is much the same.

 

Nope, have to be born to be a baby , in abortion a ZEF is killed.

 

Or not...it's up to them, not YOU.

 

Prove it.