Ketanji Brown Jackson hearing decorum far cry from explosive Kavanaugh confirmation: 'Behaving thems

You are actually quoting The Guardian to me? Lol!

 

Have they submitted her high school yearbook into evidence yet? Obviously very important info in there.

 

we will never know for sure what happened

 

First, she answered that.....don't you remember or you didn't like the answer. Second, the book in question he SAYS (no proof given) are "assigned or recommended" as reading material. Not that they are being taught.....and if they are.....so what. Third, her answer was that she's on the board....which does not pick the curriculum.
So, as usual with you and Cruz, you have no point.
The whole CRT thing is a bogey man made up issue from the right because they have nothing else. Really sad, Republicans used to stand for something.

 

Right
Don't forget that Barr kept any investigation of Kavenaugh from happening. Why? Maybe because THEY are the actual "deep state".

 

Why is the school at which she sits on the board teaching something she claims doesn't exit. How do you teach something that doesn't exist? Why doesn't the board, which oversees the school and the administrators know what they teach in the school?

 

The FBI investigated Ford's evidence and claimed witnesses and those of the other women who made such allegations. None had any credibility and do not to this day. It was one of the worst ever hearing ever to have occurred in the Capital the Dems disgraced the Congress by what they attempted to do just as they did with Clarence Thomas.

 

Beyond a reasonable doubt we do. She presented no credible evidence, what little she attempted was unequivocally refuted, yet you will always accuse him. Be careful the same could happen to you.

 

get a job on the supreme court with an interview like that? I would have to pretend to be a republican

 

Again, no said they are teaching CRT, so you don't have that fact straight. The question SHOULD be how do you teach something that no one is teaching. It's not the board's job to dictate what get's taught which, again, is a fact you should know before you accuse a body.

 

Dems falling down harder than Diaper Boy on the stairs.



Enough of these fools, let's elect some folks with working brains this Nov!

 

Ok, that was just Ford. The FBI tip line had 4500 tips against Kavanaugh. How many were looked into.....zero. What does that tell you.

 

If you think the jackassery that Republians have shown in these hearings as people with "working brains" then there should be a test to take before one can vote.

 

Lol!

 

She didn't claim that it doesn't exist, it's not being taught and since both of those are true facts that means that the board does know what they teach. Try getting at least one fact correct.

 

Correct she said it never comes up, she has never dealt with it knows little about it but Cruz showed her where she had discussed CRT and mentioned CRT in her own writings how it should be a factor in sentencing. And then the fact it is being taught at the school on whose board she sits.

 

The democrats didn't have any ammo against Republican nominees either so they made some up.

Every time.

That's the difference.

 

Wow
You, like Cruz, have taken what is only a partial quote and taken it out of context to think you have won a point. Also, to your second point, it's not being taught at the school she is on the board of even thought, for some reason, you want it to be.

 

Be falsely accused but then you knew that is what I meant.

 

He held up the books being used to teach it and she claimed ignorance.

 

Liberal ignorance thinking that questioning a candidate for a life-time appointment is politics or any form of incorrect decorum.

Let us just look at the Kavanaugh and Barrett confirmations to remind us clearly what a circus really is and who led that circus: POLITICAL HACTIVISTS KNOWN AS DEMOCRATS!

The mid-terms are coming. The mid-terms are coming. Let us vote these clowns out of DC and restore some faith in our government before the Democrats destroy our country with the Looney Tunes they bring to all that they do.

 

JFC.

Have you even watched the hearings ? Decorum ? WTF……The right is TRYING everything they can but she comes back at them with actuall facts, and they can’t refute her. Thats why they are now just grandstanding and taking their time not questioning her, but using that time to make political points because its all they can do, and it is very telling.

Ted Cruz ranting and crying and his 20 minute speech without any actual questions was all we needed to know about the right. Hell, 90% of the righties on the committee have done nothing but make speeches and its been ridiculous rot watch. Ted’s whining about his time and “is she going to newer the question” BS was Iike watching a petulant little child.

And YES, until someone can tell me who paid Kavanaughs credit card debt, and paid his Country Club bill, he is a stain on the court

 

And here is what National ****ING REVIEW, not one contributor, say about Jackson.

No on Ketanji Brown Jackson

...Our concern with her nomination is more fundamental: We do not trust her to faithfully apply the Constitution and laws of the United States. That is the core of a Supreme Court justice’s job, and there are no do-overs for the Senate if it confirms a nominee who will not do so.

The problem begins with Jackson’s slender record as an appeals judge and the limits of her docket as a trial judge. She testified under oath less than a year ago that she lacked sufficient judicial experience with constitutional cases to form a view on the interpretation of the Constitution. She has not written any opinions since then to change that, or to enable an evaluation of how she approaches the task. It was encouraging to hear Jackson, in her testimony, repeatedly embrace the original public meaning as the lodestar of constitutional interpretation. It was heartening to see her distance herself from her former boss, Justice Stephen Breyer, on the use of foreign law as a guide to what our Constitution should mean. But we have nothing but her say-so by which to judge the sincerity of those pledges....
https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/03/no-on-ketanji-brown-jackson/

 

we have no idea if he did it or not, and he got a job on the supreme court, a lifetime appointment

 

Honest question but how will she be the first black female Judge when she can’t define female or woman? And how can she fight for woman’s rights when women don’t technically exist?

Democrats don’t see the absurdity in their demented belief system?