I would only be deeply concern if there was manipulation involved and didn't back off when I said no.
13-15 y.o. are not ready for sex, the responsibilities, to consequences... none of it, in our society today. if you can find a kid that isn't too embarrassed to buy./get the appropriate contraception, they still can not afford to raise a kid. Even if the older 'kid' is 18+ and out of school, while the younger one is still "jail-bait" it's all manipulation. Sure she THINKS she loves Shredder, and 'just knows' that his band will get discovered anytime now and he will be able to move out of his parents house within a year and she can then focus on raising the kid as a stay at home mother, so no need to continue school.....
there's a power difference between (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)whipped and dominatrix, too.... but so long as they are adults.... nothing illegal. So long as one isn't the boss of the other... no ethical issues....
The fact you don't see a big problem with an 18 year old having a relationship with a 14 year old really says a lot about you, none of it good.
no..... I realize you're trying to catch me painting myself into a corner.... but mental handicaps is an issue completely with it's own rules that aren't included in any definition of consenting adults.... I would also include an adult with alzheimers (sp?) to not be included. so if you are done trying to deflect with asinine comments that have nothing to do with an 18 y.o. adult statutory raping a 14 y.o. child.... I suppose you're done.
women never seem to get the punishment men do, that needs to change kodo's to the family for supporting their daughter, has to be difficult for her in school right now, with so many homophobes out there, but if her parents stand behind her, she will get through this
it's simply a distraction issue meant to make us forget that under FL law, what this girl did was illegal. A way for the gay agendists to help this girl is not to say "it's homophobic to prosecute this girl" (because that argument has failed big time already), but rather to attack the statutory rape law. That's not what this thread is about. The thread is about a lesbian throwing out the homophobe card to try to get her child predator ass out of trouble and the immediate blind support by the gay community. They ignore that this isn't a new law in FL. If the 18/14 rule was really such a big issue as they pretend it is now when it's convenient to their agenda, they would have been speaking out against the law a long time ago, or whenever a boy got charged against a 14 y.o. like this kid http://www.nydailynews.com/news/cri...ed-underage-cousin-sex-case-article-1.1703202 ....also in florida The deliberate shift in focus by gay supporters is blindingly obvious as not one of them have came out saying that this 17 y.o. should not be charged for having sex with a 14 y.o.
no, I bet it's rough for her because friends of the 18 y.o. who supported her probably harrass the 14 y.o. and calling her parents homophobes gets old quick. - - - Updated - - - uh oh.... now that will get the gay agendists coming out with distraction tactic #2 of "that's technically not pedophiles, pedophiles are..(insert definition)...." they still are avoiding the issue that the 14 yo's parents wanting charges pressed is not homophobic
the girl herself (and her parents) made the accusation of homophobia against the 14 y.o.'s parents....
oh, I thought you meant the victims parents were homophobes, I was thinking how so, they are defending their daughter, doesn't surprise me the family of the defendant would try to tarnish the victim and her parents . .
that was the accusation.... that the victim's parents were only pressing the issue because it was an 18 y.o. lesbian girl.... and many on here immediately jumped to the 18 y.o.'s side critiquing the fact that 18/14 really isn't a crime. Well, yes, it is, in the state of FL and it's not like that law is new. They simply threw out the homophobic accusation in order to try and get the victim and her family to back off on pushing the issue. And gay supporters on here won't admit that, instead, they keep trying to go back to the "18/14 isn't that big a deal" argument Why is it when the 17 y.o. boy got arrested for it (also in florida) this week, I don't see any of the "it's not that bad" crowd defending him? or accusing the victim's family of some sort of political phobia to try and get them not to press the issue.
Not really, power difference is about their mental development, mental power difference, not differences in other areas.
but notice the distinct absence of online petitions trying to get florida to drop the charges against the boy
I'm curious to way a lot gays are supporting Kate Hunt. Mental development is only a part of it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_rape
Oh it's relevant to the topic. Didn't you say that one of the reasons why you were against an 18 and 14 year old having sex was due to "power difference"?
yep, that's why both adult/child sex and adult/mentally handicapped adult sex are both illegal? you got me.... damn, you made me admit sex with mentally challenged adults is bad.... .
Actually those are illegal because children(pre-puberty) and the severely mentally can not give meaningful consent(understanding the nature of an act and it consequences). Early adolescents(like 13-15) is only illegal due to power indifference, meaning this: My point in bringing up the blind is that this kind of power difference exists among legal adults.
no there's not..... they are socially equal, economically is give or take in any relationship, but they are legally equal.... whereas kids have limited legal freedoms, since they have guardians, just like mentally disabled. Blind, deaf.... wheelchair, cancer.... whatever other thing you can use in order to justify 18 having sex with 14 as being ok, is simply not even anywhere close to reality and you know it.
Legally equal? So the blind are allowed to drive vehicles on the streets or work jobs similar to that? The blind are just as independent as people with sight? Just playing devil's advocate here and pointing out I what I think are flaws in the system's way of thinking.
