My argument is that all matter, no matter which "state" it's in is, on a micro level, solid because we have perceived it. - - - Updated - - - You mean all those SOLID little atoms?
I guess you're not up to date on the latest science, my friend. We live inside a holographic universe. The existence of ANY and ALL matter is now that which is in question.
More like, following you around and watching the inane attention-seeking garbel you write just makes him feel better in comparison - about his sex life.
Oh Brother! Another one of those....Holographic B.S. Believers. You can't project a Holographic Image upon empty space...nor will it create a Gravity Well. AboveAlpha
Actually, at that level, it comes down to force fields which surround empty space, which we then call a "proton" or "Electron". Empty space is not what I would call "solid". In fact, the whole of holographic theory is founded on the fact that it's NOT solid.
The empty space between particles does exist, once perceived. Because it exists, just like light beams for example, it is in fact a tangible piece of matter/energy.
That which has been perceived, at least once, by at least one conscious entity. That which is tangible, and even some human concepts which are not tangible outside the blackness of the inner brain.
Wait, that's not the definition of the solid state of matter that I'm familiar with. Therefore I think you are using code words which is confusing everyone. What is your definition of Liquid?
Does my powerful scientific theory scare you? Does it challenge your illusory paradigm, and make you feel self doubt?
You're attempting to redefine "solid" as "existence".. Not the same thing....not matter how much bloviating you do.
If something exists, is it not a tangible, physical thing? And if all things are made of particles, and if all particles are made of solid atoms and micro-particles, are not ALL things solid?
Go read a physics book. Atoms and subatomic particles are NOT solid. The concept of solid can ONLY apply at the molecular level.
Molecules are just as theoretical as time travel. They've never been observed my the human eye. Maybe MY theory is correct.
We are perfectly capable of seeing individual Atoms with an Electron Microscope.....Molecules are chemically bonded Atoms such as H20....water which is two Hydrogen Atoms sharing Electron Orbits with an Oxygen Atom. Your statement is BEYOND ignorant. AboveAlpha - - - Updated - - - The only thing that scares me is that there exists people such as yourself with such an incredible lack of knowledge specific to this topic....especially about things that most of us learned in 3rd grade. AboveAlpha
You do know that your illogical scientific paradigms are not PROVEN fact, don't you? They are accepted theories. The snowball of "accepted" science is built on an unproven mesh of Theories. Those of us who keep up know this quite well.
Below is an image of silicon atoms taken with scanning tunneling electron microscope. These silicon atoms are in a crystalline molecular configuration, notice the hexagonal pattern of the molecules. By the way, the fact that we are having this discussion proves beyond all doubt that molecules exist since everything in your body from the water in you to your DNA are made up of molecules.
Those of us who keep up? LOL!!!! I have read some fairy outrageous posts in my time but you take the cake! You have absolutely ZERO knowledge about Physics and your descriptions of fantasy concerning Atomic Particles, Quantum Particle/Wave Forms and State Changes such as Liquid to Solid...etc....goes beyond laughable. Now I am very open to new concepts and ideas and I am always open to listen to anyone who might have a VIABLE idea that might go against the status quo but in your case every statement you have presented and even more than that....you have demanded others to believe it and have not presented even the tinniest bit of evidence, logic or even a THREAD that might be presented to show us where you believe there may be a connection is non-existent. What is even BEYOND LAUGHABLE is you mistakenly think that there might be someone here or member who might be stupid enough to be duped into going along with your obvious fantasy as it would seem you have some deep seated need to attempt to find such people who might not have a level of education that would allow them to see your fantasy self created fake science as something worth while to follow. Well...I am certainly happy to say that it appears that the members here that have read your B.S. have an education exceeding 3rd Grade Science. I am not angry or even upset with you but rather I am genuinely CONCERNED for your mental stability as I have never before seen anyone who has consumed themselves into so great a delusion....so whatever you might think of me I will still like to say if you feel you need help in finding a way to lift yourself out of this delusion....I will be more than happy to try to help you....as I would rather have to endure a few insults if the result might be being able to help someone. PM me if you would prefer to keep this between you and I as I will tell no one. AboveAlpha
You seem quite vested in popular accepted THEORY and the snowball of "science" that builds upon it. I don't think you're really willing to step outside your mental conditioning prison quite yet. Don't expect a PM. And don't bother sending one either, Mr. Bigshot Smartypants (who obviously knows everything, ever). EDIT:: Remember, they told Copernicus and Einstein they were "crazy" too.
Look....you can call me whatever names you want....I will still try to help you if you chose to allow me. And I have no hate or animosity toward you as I now understand what is going on. AboveAlpha
