List the reasons we should bring muslim "refugees" to the US

I understand your point. I just think it is bull(*)(*)(*)(*).

But I won't waste my time with an admirer of Bin Laden who think terrorists have not only a right to enter the US illegally, but to vote in our elections if they succeed.

 

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/21/us/6-somali-americans-arrested-in-isis-recruiting-case.html

 

Six people? Close the borders!!!!! Lol

 

Is it okay to ignore the nature of Islam- a sort of religion that teaches hate for all non-muslims, that endorses stoning, honor killings of your own children, that is the primary source of conflicts in the world today?

Many people see Muslims as a carrying something similar to a disease which may be dormant or in remission, but is present in all Muslims because it has been indoctrinated from birth. If it becomes active, you have a terrorist. Certainly, the vast majority of Muslims are not terrorists- but they all have been exposed to the ideology that is at the core of the jihadist mindset and the hate for the western world. Given that Islam is the most intensely embedded religious teaching of all, it's virtually systemic. The potential risk is one that does not exist in any other religious entity.

It would be nice if this were not true- but it is; that is the reality of it. Denial of that is self-deception.

 

Because Hispanics born here do have higher crime rates than white Americans.

Immigration should also take into account their spawn.

Illegal and legal Hispanic immigrants will produce higher crime prone children than white immigrants and whites born here.

Why do we want cheap lettuce if the cost is a permanent Hispanic presence creating more 'diversity' (social strife, gang culture, higher welfare rates, more criminals, lower social cohesion and less sense of community)?

 

This report mentions twenty more, and also points out the ones that don't become terrorists become gangsters:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...s-growing-somalia-gang-threat-hennepin-county

More reports on crime:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32010471/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/minneapolis-struggles-somali-gangs/

Here's a charming one about Somolai sex trafficking:

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/41446307/...angs-move-sex-trafficking-fraud/#.V-bDmcl9Ba8

So yes, close the borders!

Why the hell not?

 

No one....not even trump....wants the borders closed.

- - - Updated - - -

Without illegals we would have a national depression

 

Close the borders to Muslims. Especially refugees.

Why do we want to replicate the European experience?

Muslims bring trouble, as I have documented already. Not that it isn't glaringly obvious anyway.

 

This is an interesting theory. Perhaps we should encourage immigration of the group that commits the least crime and consistently does well in school. Asians. They clearly should get preference over whites.

- - - Updated - - -

0.0001% of them do.

 

That's funny, because illegal immigrant headed households are a net deficit to the US economy.

http://www.heritage.org/research/re...ful-immigrants-and-amnesty to-the-us-taxpayer

 

I have no problem with exclusive Asian immigration if that means no more blacks and browns.

The downside is that northeast Asian run nations are not run as well as northern European (descended) run nations.

So, how well a people run a nation should be factored into the variables, as well.

 

Who cares what they do in their own countries? Here they do great. Exclusive Asian immigration will make them the majority in the future. Press 1 for english

 

So, in Syria (which is the major problem inspiring increased immigration) the 80% majority religious sect (Sunnis) is being bombed by the ruler who is of a Shiite offshoot and is aligned with Iran and Russia.

And, you blame them for what? For being too passive? For not staying there and getting slaughtered?

 

Those establishing the ideology for America most certainly did believe in the natural rights of all people and they also opposed slavery even though several of them inherited estates with slaves.

What they also knew, and that Jefferson addressed, is that due to oppressive nature of slavery it would require many generations for blacks to overcome that oppression ideologically. Yes, some advocated that the slave be returned to Africa because they would be incapable of competing in the America society for generations because of the oppression they suffered as slaves but none of the ideological founders of the United States ever believed that identical natural rights of the person didn't apply to everyone. Only the White (WASP) Male Supremacists believed that non-WASP's and women didn't have the identical Natural Rights of the Person.

It similar to what many White Supremacist claim today saying that racial economic oppression doesn't exist like it once did so the only reason blacks are poor today is because of a lack of motivation. The problem with this is that if we go back to the freeing of the slaves economically it required 15 generations, or 450 years, before blacks would reach economic parity with the whites that had never been slaves. 450 friggin' years for blacks to recover from the economic oppression they suffered because of slavery.

 

Oh it is much higher than that.

The question remains, why should we admit any at all?

 

Or any whites either. Only the best for America. Asians

 

No, white people are an asset because they understand the culture speak English already and assimilate well. There is no comparison with Muslims at all. The Asians we admit are also fine and an asset to our country.

 

Nope. Only the best for America. No more white trash. Why don't you want the best for America? Do you hate this country?

 

There is no real legitimate reason for it, nor does it strengthen or make our country better in any way. It's just democrats pandering for more votes, nothing more.

 

White people are the best. It is the Left that hates white people, largely because they are the best.

Look who made this country, for goodness sake!

 

Yes let's make America more like North Africa, because it's working so well for them and Detroit, Chicago, and Oakland.

I wonder if they will complain about slavery then since it will be their own that will do them like that? Slavery business is booming in North Africa.

 

Whites are not the best, every race or ethnicity has their problems. But we are a hell of a lot better off without Muslims raiding our nation.

 

Asians who immigrant contribute the most and cause the fewest problems. No more white trash....right!

 

The Somolais have started a nice business in sex slaves, already. That is one of the hallmarks of Muslim culture. Sex slavery is thriving in Great Britain and it is tolerated by their rulers as a mark of multiculturalism.

 

As soon as you agree to no more Muslims, no more illegals , no more refugees , no more gang bangers then I will be glad to help rid our country of the worthless white trash.

But it has to be in that order because white trash is the least of Americas problem.

- - - Updated - - -

Oh yes, musli s would love nothing more than to be freely able to follow in Mohammed's footsteps, groom your toddler and make her their sex toy.

And democrats want more of these guys among us.