Great. That will limit the New York AG and her investigation into Trump and his businesses. He is still going to be investigated though, and justifiably so.
Everyone and their mother knew those negotiations were doomed to fail from the beginning, but Cohen requested the dates - not the Democrats.
I have no doubt the President will be investigated. The tyranny of the new left is insatiable. This new standard will haunt the new left and their elected officials for many years to come.
No the link proves that the term " Blue Dog Democrats" refers to members of congress not individual voters. That was the education I was providing for your benefit. Obviously enough Independants and possibly Democratic boters changed from voting for Obama to later voting against Hillary to swing the election. That is what the WAPO article says.
But of course the negotiations turned out to be a total fiasco. Or are you claiming that somehow Trump is so pathetic that somehow the congessional hearing caused Trump's failure.
They weren't and I didn claim they did. That doesn't Belgium the fact the Democrats pulled their fiasco while the President was out if the country negotiating a VERY important global matter. Why didn't they wait till this week?
Correct...the Dems are investigating Trump simply because he embarrassed them and won the 2016 election. On ABC this morning the Dems admitted they were simply going to investigate to investigate, and not to find anything.....it's all about politics and undermining the election
While that does refer to members of Congress and their Coalition. It also denotes Demo Voters from the South who has a conservative voting record. blue dog Dem·o·crat [blue dog Democrat] NOUN blue dog Democrats (plural noun) (in the US) a Democrat from a southern state who has a conservative voting record.....snip~ Naturally the term evolved to include those Union workers in the Midwest and Northern States. That voted to put Blue Dog Democrats in Office.
Can you provide a source or are you just snipping to make it look like the term applies to voters. Every dictionary, reliable source and my own history of being politically active would say that blue dog Democrat applies to only elected officials who are officially Democrats but tend to vote Conservative. , And by the eay that definition doesn't say voter. In fact the " has a Conservative voting record" would appear to limit it to elected officials since it is impossible to know a voters " voting record" and if that actually referred to voters in a presidential election then they would't have switched and suddenly voted for Trump after voting for Obama.
Dude I live in Chicago Illinois.....I know what Blue Dog Democrat voters are just with this state. But here......they voted for Hillary. Oh and I gave you a definition. And I wasn't talking about Blue Dog Demo Politicians. No where did I day Demo Politicians voted for Trump. Moreover I gave you 2 links about Demo Supporters voting for Trump. You can even check out Kentucky where Counties that voted for Democrats from their Beginning dumped the Demos and voted for Trump. Even after voting for Obama twice. Also in those states that I mentioned. Democrats voted for Trump. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan, and Ohio. Which those were the states that put Trump over the top. Lastly that is also including those that voted for Stein and Johnson. Which was another factor. Slim as they were. Of course, as a Politico. I already factored in the Low Democrat voter turn out for 2016 Election and I included those that voted for Bernie. Maybe you should find a way to be more involved with the Threads that Perotista puts up on elections. Where you can learn from someone who does a great deal of research on elections. Then ask him How I do with the reality on the ground. Response to the argument that "Sanders voters" put Trump ... https://www.democraticunderground.com/10029507696 The assertion that "Sanders voters elected Trump", in an online article released Wednesday is correlation without causation. In three swing states, a certain number of voters happened to cast their votes for Bernie Sanders in the primaries, then happened to vote for Donald Trump in November. This is an empirically factual statement.
The only "reasonable suspicion" they have is he won an election. Give us a list of "crimes" he was investigated for before he announced his run for POTUS. She clearly said she was investigating him AND his family, not crimes that have been committed. I don't need a more "damning" quote. That one is more than sufficient.
Well so far you have failed to provide any definition that says individual voters can be " Blue Dog Democrats". In fact if you can read I already blew you definition out of the water. Every dictionary definition specifically says it apples to office holders. Learn to Google. And no one is arguing that some Democrats who voted for Obama voted for Trump.
I already gave you one definition. Blue dog voters of the Demo blend are those Blue Collar workers that actually work jobs. Unlike your Demo Elites and all those Demos that sit on their ass doing nothing. Plus I already showed you the Demos from Obama strongholds that bailed on your kind. Face the facts. The Demos put Trump over the top and gave him the win. Read those States again. Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Ohio. Those are the States that gave Trump the win. States that your kind thought they had in the bag. Other than Ohio. Democrats need these conservatives to win in 2018 https://nypost.com/2017/07/29/democrats-need-these-conservatives... Voters in Pennsylvania and Ohio, who had once been represented by Blue Dog members of Congress and supported Democratic candidates for president, flipped for the outsider candidate. Whats even funnier is you not knowing how Blue Dog Demo Politicians get elected, and by whom. Don't let those words Blue Collar.....cause you to much confusion.
As I explicitly referenced, the Trump Charitable Foundation already was under investigation for fraudulent practices before she was elected. Also before she was elected were the fact that five Trump organizations were under investigation by a multitude of investigatory agencies. The NY AG had jurisdiction to investigate nearly all of those organizations. You are not convincing anyone if you want to argue she had zero reason to announce investigations into Trump and his organizations.
Yeah, and her office still existed. The NY AG's office wasn't born in July of 2018. You're of course referring to the "investigation" opened by Schneidermann, who also said he was going to investigate Trump the man and his family. That worked out great for Mr. "Me Too" Schneidermann, huh? What was it again he got dropped for? Oh yeah, sexual assault and racism. All investigations opened after Trump was POTUS, and not a single one that I'm aware of before that.
It's almost like running for President opens you up, justifiably, to a whole new level of scrutiny. How Donald Trump Lost by Winning
Cause he's Michael Cohen, man... you dont put theatre like that on hold for Trumps second date with Kim... But like most of Trumps dates ( I suspect), this one ended prematurely...
It doesn't open you up to lawsuits that wouldn't exist otherwise, no. Which, of course, is why the NY AG is going to get stomped on with any case she tries to bring. Maybe she should start with figuring out where Deblasio's wife lost that $1 billion. Will that be "investigated" or nah?
I am sure that Hillary Clinton and the 13 Benghazi Investigations are somehow distinguishable and justified in your mind. But speaking of new precedent, I look forward to watching the 2020 Democratic President railroad every judicial pick and declare national emergencies over gun violence/climate change/healthcare.
Right, Hillary was President at the time. Oops. You actually think the next NDP President is going to be able to simply wave off the avalanche of accusations coming non-stop from all quarters? Now that's wishful thinking.
No the confusion is your's and your inability to understand that the term " Blue Dog Democrats" is entirely separate from " Blue Collar" or your totally imaginary " Blue Dog Voters" is either a rather lame attempt to obfuscate or a sign of intellectual insufficiency. Pick one!
Batman and Boy Blunder are too busy to be involved in politics. After all, they have other things on their minds: then comes the revelation: after attending to that, it's time for this: thereafter, it's time for a few private sessions: and then just a little recreation:
