NIST has no evidence, the official "Story" is DEAD

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Apr 7, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    couldnt have slid off better if it was cut at a 45
     
  2. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Hog wash.
    There are no explosive ejecta before the perimeter columns collapse inward. You are stuck with the weakend perimeter columns being pulled inward by the sagging floor trusses.
     
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113

    OMG another one for the ridiculous trougher theories archives!

    had nothing to do with weak columns and there is all sorts ejection.

    sheees
     
  4. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There were none on the floors where the columns collapse inward. It is really that simple.
     
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    oh there is a way, but I already proved that it was not due to floor collapse, that is absurdo max comedy ridiculous, but there is a way it can happen.
     
  6. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Proved what? I was saying that there were no explosive ejecta from the floors on which the columns buckled inward before the top of the building started to move. Not, do you have an explanation for the inward buckling of the perimeter columns other than the weight of the floor slabs pulling them in?
     
  7. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    sure the was plenty of it. strange anyone would jerk around with anything so obvious.
     
  8. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Show us the evidence of explosive ejecta occurring before the columns buckle inward.
     
  9. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    so explosions after they buckle is acceptable to you but before they buckle is not, tell us how that works.
     
  10. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What look like explosives going off to you is actually hundreds of pounds of pulverized drywall being squeezed out.

    Explosions that occur after an event cannot cause the event. No explosive charges went off before the columns buckled. They would have been observeable in the smoke and flame they would have ejected.
     
  11. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    no there are several squibs prior to the event, and after maintains the event. I already proved to you that explosives do not always eject debris during a demolition, why do you keep pretending that its not an explosion unless you see the kitchen sink fly out.
     
  12. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    None of what I have seen idiots post as photos or video of squibs have been squibs, so the burden of proof is on you. Your argument is the counter-intuitive. You need to bring something besides your attitude to this.

    No, you haven't.
     
  13. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    proving it is one thing troughers accepting the proof is entirely another story

    [​IMG]

    that is an HE demolition, squibs, no visible large chunks of debris.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Your gif is completely unlike the WTC collapse.
     
  15. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, of course not. There are numerous small ones, though, despite your attempts to hide them by the use of the crappiest possible format and worst image quality on the net.
     
  16. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113

    not hiding anyting, they serve their purpose just dandy. Why would you then claim there were no HE forcing me to correct you like literally everything else troughers claim out here
     
  17. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What detail is discernable in your GIF still does not resemble what was going on the the towers when the walls buckled inward.
     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the issue was squibs
     
  19. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have none of those, either. No explosive charges went off inside the tower before the walls buckled inward. Thus, they were OBVIOUSLY PULLED INWARD. The only existing mechanism for doing that was sagging floor trusses.
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thats not true, you agreed that loss of the core would also do that.

    and its impossible if its due to heated trusses, I showed you that.

    75% of the exoskeleton would have to be completely gone and 83% of the core for it to cave.
     
  21. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, you did not prove that, nor did you show us any other phenomenon that could pull the columns inward to initiate collapse.
     
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    nope we been there done that, you agreed, senility setting in huh
     
  23. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Senile? I would not argue if somebody suggested that you were getting dementia pugilistica from being slapped down so many times, but I still know what I am talking about. You have not shown any method by which the columns could be pulled inward other than by the weight of the floors.
     
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,574
    Likes Received:
    1,747
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thats right experts are incapable of conceptualizing anything and they need pretty pictures



    [​IMG]
     
  25. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That is the most childish piece of crap that anybody has posted here in a long time. This is Wiley Coyote fantasy. You do no get to cut the top off of a tree and watch the bottom fall to the ground.

    Then twoofers wonder why I talk about them like little children! Yeesh!
     

Share This Page