NIST has no evidence, the official "Story" is DEAD

Discussion in '9/11' started by Kokomojojo, Apr 7, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I wonder if it's a freudian slip that koko's 'explosions' look like a star of david....
     
  2. holston

    holston Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2012
    Messages:
    1,591
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    38
  3. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    the reason no one takes debunkers seriously any more is because they always point out what they wish would be the case not what really IS the case.

    I think it got so old that people are just ignoring debunkers altogether now days and listening to the truthers who have proven to be correct.

    See there are two little red flashers, that represent core explosions that take out the columns both above and below the area you want to cave in the side of the tower. Its the only way you can make it go beyond its design loading.

    [​IMG]


    see its impossible for trusses heated to the point of failure to pull in the sides, but if they are holding up the load of of the core too, well that will do it.
     
  4. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The official story was DOA
    on 9/11/2001 ad far as I'm concerned, from viewing the video of two 110 story skyscrapers
    that "collapse" in a manner that demands that every floor break right in sequence, on time every time.
    NOT HAPPENING! This could be no other than a planned for event that somebody engineered to
    happen just exactly as it did.
     
  5. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How else to you expect them to break in a progressive collapse,child?
     
  6. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Given that the damage to the towers & 7 was not of a uniform nature, WHY
    should anybody expect that the "collapse" would be of a uniform nature?

    The very fact of total destruction speaks volumes right there,
    do you get it, ... that is the fact of complete destruction of anything
    is considered very suspicious.

    in order to produce the result as observed, tens of thousands
    of connections within each building would have to fail right on schedule.

    do you see?
     
  7. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The destruction was not 'complete'. It took over a year, with workers laboring 24/7, to clean up the rubble piles.
    In addition, all of that rubble was thoroughly examined.
     
  8. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    in all the artifacts recovered, was there anything that was WHOLE,
    that is a complete copy machine or computer or telephone?
    ALL of it was busted up + mass quantities of material of all kinds had
    been pulverized, and you claim that the destruction was not complete.
    what makes you say "not complete"?
     
  9. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Quite a few things were left whole.
    Here's another page of things:
    http://rolandopujol.tumblr.com/post/31215494887/photos-the-stories-behind-the-haunting-relics-of-the
     
  10. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    if that is the best you can do, I stick with what I said earlier, destruction was total,
    look at the pictures of "ground zero" after the smoke cleared 'nuff to take pix.
    what does that tell you? This degree of destruction, caused by a gravity powered
    "collapse" event that involved a lot of non-uniform damage & heat, and ended with
    the total destruction of 3 skyscrapers.
     
  11. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So you ignore the pictures of statures, office equipment, lottery machines, etc that you said were destroyed.
    Not very honest of you, 'truth-seeker'.
     
  12. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    exactly where were these statues ( etc .... )
    inside either the north or south tower, or in some other location,
    I noticed that in one of the lists of artifacts, there was a file cabinet
    found in WTC6, but what about anything from either the North or South tower
    or WTC7 ?

    Also may I call attention to the pix of the aftermath of the "collapse" events
    and look for some bit of the building(s) that is the towers or 7 that is still standing,.
    at least in the case of WTC5 & 6, there was a significant remnant of the building
    still standing.
     
  13. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why is it so important to have recognizable artifacts from the collapse of the towers?
     
  14. n0spam

    n0spam New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2014
    Messages:
    485
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    it is VERY important to note that so few objects of any sort survived
    the "collapse" events and that is significant in that in any accidental event
    it could rightfully be expected to see some artifacts, possibly a computer
    or desk or chair or possibly a telephone that survived the event, however in
    the case of the towers, there is only miniscule evidence that there were
    even any offices in the towers at all.

    The fact of complete & total destruction is significant.
     
  15. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    People inside the towers survived the collapse.

    Look at the link I posted, it says specifically where those items were located.
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You DO understand that the dynamics of the collapse would have pulverized such items,making them unrecognizable,the same way it did with the victims still in the towers?
     
  17. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one understands voodoo ficksix so how about explaining how free falling free floating bodies pulverize each other while suspended in mid air?


    [​IMG]
     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    here is an easy one for you.

    what is the total capacity and how much of that energy does it require to pulverize the concrete floors
     
  19. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    what is a "ground fire"?
     
  20. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    What evidence do you have that all 110 concrete floors were completely pulverized to make this question even remotely meaningful?
     
  21. Colonel K

    Colonel K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,770
    Likes Received:
    556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nobody but you is suggesting they did.
     
  22. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So exactly how is it that tons of material became pulverized
    and ejected from the tower(s) as was done on 9/11/2001?
     
  23. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    And you have been asked what "tons" of "materials" you are talking about?

    For example, you say concrete based on a dust study you linked. I showed you that gypsum wallboard (quite a bit of it in the towers) can be attributed to what made up the dust.

    No answer from you yet.
     
  24. Colonel K

    Colonel K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,770
    Likes Received:
    556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I have no more idea than you, but it occurs to me that the compounding impact of more and more floors as they they concertina'd downward might just possibly have had an effect.
     
  25. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    if mass quantities of concrete had not been pulverized
    then were is it? pictures of concrete in whole chunks?
    what is there?

    - - - Updated - - -

    in the video of the tower(s) collapsing
    there is the continuous ejection of pulverized material as
    it "collapses" ..... how is that done?
     

Share This Page