the reason no one takes debunkers seriously any more is because they always point out what they wish would be the case not what really IS the case. I think it got so old that people are just ignoring debunkers altogether now days and listening to the truthers who have proven to be correct. See there are two little red flashers, that represent core explosions that take out the columns both above and below the area you want to cave in the side of the tower. Its the only way you can make it go beyond its design loading. see its impossible for trusses heated to the point of failure to pull in the sides, but if they are holding up the load of of the core too, well that will do it.
The official story was DOA on 9/11/2001 ad far as I'm concerned, from viewing the video of two 110 story skyscrapers that "collapse" in a manner that demands that every floor break right in sequence, on time every time. NOT HAPPENING! This could be no other than a planned for event that somebody engineered to happen just exactly as it did.
Given that the damage to the towers & 7 was not of a uniform nature, WHY should anybody expect that the "collapse" would be of a uniform nature? The very fact of total destruction speaks volumes right there, do you get it, ... that is the fact of complete destruction of anything is considered very suspicious. in order to produce the result as observed, tens of thousands of connections within each building would have to fail right on schedule. do you see?
The destruction was not 'complete'. It took over a year, with workers laboring 24/7, to clean up the rubble piles. In addition, all of that rubble was thoroughly examined.
in all the artifacts recovered, was there anything that was WHOLE, that is a complete copy machine or computer or telephone? ALL of it was busted up + mass quantities of material of all kinds had been pulverized, and you claim that the destruction was not complete. what makes you say "not complete"?
Quite a few things were left whole. Here's another page of things: http://rolandopujol.tumblr.com/post/31215494887/photos-the-stories-behind-the-haunting-relics-of-the
if that is the best you can do, I stick with what I said earlier, destruction was total, look at the pictures of "ground zero" after the smoke cleared 'nuff to take pix. what does that tell you? This degree of destruction, caused by a gravity powered "collapse" event that involved a lot of non-uniform damage & heat, and ended with the total destruction of 3 skyscrapers.
So you ignore the pictures of statures, office equipment, lottery machines, etc that you said were destroyed. Not very honest of you, 'truth-seeker'.
exactly where were these statues ( etc .... ) inside either the north or south tower, or in some other location, I noticed that in one of the lists of artifacts, there was a file cabinet found in WTC6, but what about anything from either the North or South tower or WTC7 ? Also may I call attention to the pix of the aftermath of the "collapse" events and look for some bit of the building(s) that is the towers or 7 that is still standing,. at least in the case of WTC5 & 6, there was a significant remnant of the building still standing.
it is VERY important to note that so few objects of any sort survived the "collapse" events and that is significant in that in any accidental event it could rightfully be expected to see some artifacts, possibly a computer or desk or chair or possibly a telephone that survived the event, however in the case of the towers, there is only miniscule evidence that there were even any offices in the towers at all. The fact of complete & total destruction is significant.
People inside the towers survived the collapse. Look at the link I posted, it says specifically where those items were located.
You DO understand that the dynamics of the collapse would have pulverized such items,making them unrecognizable,the same way it did with the victims still in the towers?
No one understands voodoo ficksix so how about explaining how free falling free floating bodies pulverize each other while suspended in mid air?
here is an easy one for you. what is the total capacity and how much of that energy does it require to pulverize the concrete floors
What evidence do you have that all 110 concrete floors were completely pulverized to make this question even remotely meaningful?
So exactly how is it that tons of material became pulverized and ejected from the tower(s) as was done on 9/11/2001?
And you have been asked what "tons" of "materials" you are talking about? For example, you say concrete based on a dust study you linked. I showed you that gypsum wallboard (quite a bit of it in the towers) can be attributed to what made up the dust. No answer from you yet.
I have no more idea than you, but it occurs to me that the compounding impact of more and more floors as they they concertina'd downward might just possibly have had an effect.
if mass quantities of concrete had not been pulverized then were is it? pictures of concrete in whole chunks? what is there? - - - Updated - - - in the video of the tower(s) collapsing there is the continuous ejection of pulverized material as it "collapses" ..... how is that done?
