A complete failure by any and all measurements....even Obama's..... http://thenextright.com/chris-moody/200-economists-against-stimulus 200 Economists Against Obama's Stimulus [/pwnage] . . . .
Give a conservative a fish, and he decides it isn't really meat. Teach a conservative to fish, and he overfishes the species to extinction in a few years but retires on the profits.
As opposed to the Rush Limbaugh version? I'm intelligent enough to sort through the biases, but much of the problem how he communicates. Newt believes in dividing and conquering.
Funny. Mind if I do one for a liberal? Give a liberal a fish, the next day 5 liberals are waiting with their hands out and popping out babies every 3 mins. Teach a liber too fish.... Nvm, that is physical labor. The next day he is demanding his unemployment fish.
Actually, it takes 9 months to have a baby. Red States also use Entitlments more then Blue States. Democrats support them, and that is why they get the blame for living on them. Sure this page has a Liberal Bias, but I am sure you can find similar data to support these facts. http://articles.businessinsider.com...039546_1_blue-states-federal-taxes-red-states
Well if one can justify voting for the greater of two goods...... .....then voting for the lesser of two evils has also been justified. . . . Newt is definitely not my first choice.......but he isnt my 314,874,445th choice either.......thats Barack HusSame Obama. . . .
Both are equally bad. I'm not an American, but I'm a conserative and Gingrich is by far the worst GOP candidate. This article sums it up pretty well: http://www.amren.com/mtnews/archives/2011/12/newt_gingrich_i.php
And if presented with a General election between Gingrich and Barack HusSame Obama--The Worst President in US History..... ......would you vote for Newt? . . .
Give me a city breakdown and we can talk. I bet I won't be surprised that the majority of those red states are feeding mostly their blue cities for welfare. Jackson MI, New Orleans LA, Atlanta GA. Till there is a city break down, I am not even going to try to show you how wrong you are.
The CBO is about as reliable and nonpartisan as they come. Do you have evidence that it did not provide a stimulus? Because every other objective measure shows that it did. On the list of things that have contributed to the deficit, the stimulus is near the bottom. Republican policies top the list, in fact. Furthermore, debt is only relevant as a ratio of debt to economy size. By not having the stimulus,the economy would be smaller and the ratio exaggerated. Cutting spending shrinks the economy and results in just as devastating a debt ratio due to decreased revenue and the smaller economy versus the same size of debt. By calling Obama a Marxist, you have demonstrated a complete lack of knowledge of his positions and the positions of communism. Mr. Obama is very beholden to capitalism. His policies have all been center-right by most standards. The stimulus was less than half of what many economists called for and the healthcare bill was constructed by Republican ideas that were abandoned once the President showed support for them.
Obama is nothing like Bush. That is insulting. The stimulus was watered down with Republican tax cuts and it was too small but it did work. You keep repeating the lie it might be true some day I guess that's how Republicans roll. The ADA already allowed 2.5 million young adults get insurance. 2.5 times the number estimated. That's a heck of a lot more people out of the er. Not bad. Until your party has better plan I'll keep the one we fought for. I personally choose single payer.. but I'm patient.
Assuming that Gingrich gets the nomination, I would vote for Obama. I have seen what Gingrich does with his elected office. I have seen the abuses, the use of his position to try and stomp out political rivals. I have seen his lack of morality iun action,. I have seen his ethics violations. I have seen the raging hypocrisy of a man that he is. I would rather go with the lesser of two evils, albeit slight.
You don't see what Obama has done? They are one in the same. That is why this would be the perfect 3rd party candidate time. I will be writing in Ron Paul even if he doesn't choose to run 3rd party. But if you want to vote for evil, why not go all the way instead of half assing it? Going half speed gets more people injured.
In my post I clearly stated the lesser of two evils. I did not applaud the president. If Romney wins the nomination I would likely vote for him.
Well slap my booty and label me a redneck. TFM openly admits that President Obama is evil. Good for you TFM, goof for you!
Romney, as Michell O'Donnel said, "He has been consistant since he flip-flopped". Yeah, that would be the best choice.
