Palestine to be recommended to UNESCO

Well, then it is sad that you believe that only idiots accept Israel. Can't people accept Israel without being insulted as being idiots by folks like you?

Israel would be a total idiot if it threatened civilians with nuclear weapons. Only idiots threaten the innocent with weapons of mass destruction.

 

As far as I'm aware, the Israelis haven't treated the Church of the Nativity in this fashion:

I don't know why you bother to imply that the Israelis would treat the Church of the Nativity the same way the Palestinians treated Joseph's Tomb. The whole basis of your position is xenophobic.

I'm not going anywhere, toots. I trust you enjoyed the picture...

 

It's sad that you feel compelled to fabricate more lies to shore up your intellectually defective and illogical fabrications. However, it is not surprising - a wanton disregard for fact and logic is a consistent feature of your posts.

Only amoral anti-Semitic idiots concoct scenarios to advocate the nuclear destruction of Israel.

 

No they do not call for the destruction of Israel. You really should get out more: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2006/jan/12/israel (I realise it was only 5 years ago and Americans are a little behind the rest of the world, but really...)

 

Describe for us what it is that your picture depicts. Then tell us how that could possibly relate to the permanent occupation and disfigurement of Bethlehem....on your way out.

 

A clue for the disingenuously obtuse - it depicts the pillaging and torching of Joseph's Tomb by the people whose flag is in your avatar.

Now, tell us how the Church of the Nativity has been similarly pillaged and razed by the Israelis on your way out....

 

Does this mean that you feel that it is terribly wrong to accuse Palestinians of being "idiots" simply because they accept Israel?

It is not nice of you to call yourself an "anti-Semitic idiot" simply because you keep on talking about your nuclear destruction of Israel interests. Such certainly explains your extremely hostile attitude towards Palestinians who accept Israel. Why do you believe that Palestinians are "idiots" simply because they accept Israel?

 

No, it means that you haven't the ability to form a reasonable conclusion based on what you've been told. And the Palestinians are idiots. As is anyone who sides with them.

Please, feel free to post your next lame interpretation of what I've said.

 

The Palestinians have repaired the tomb ....unlike the damage caused to Bethlehem by its Zionist occupiers.



....and don't forget....on your way out... that both Joseph's tomb and Bethlehem are in Palestinian territory. Pick up thy pallet and walk, as they say to squatters.

 

Thus, you hate Semites simply because they recognize and accept the nation of Israel. This means that your position is anti-Israel and Jew-hostile.

 

Nope. Pro-Israeli. Anti-Hamas.

 

It means precisely what it states. If you need to re-read it to comprehend its meaning, I suggest you take the liberty of doing so.

Unlike yourself, I have never expressed any advocacy of the nuclear destruction of Israel or it interests. Obviously, no one could call themselves anything in relationship to a statement that never existed, but as I pointed out earlier, a wanton disregard for fact and logic is a consistent feature of your posts.

The only thing the falsehoods you've fabricated explain is the wanton and deliberate disregard for facts that is a consistent feature of your posts. What this dishonesty explains about you and your attitudes is something I will leave for everyone to conclude on their own.

Why do you dishonestly claim that I believe that Palestinians are "idiots" simply because they accept Israel? If you're trying to deflect from your morally vacuous and repugnant advocacy of the nuclear destruction of Israel, it's not working...

 

It's actually a ' consistent feature ' of your posts- every time you misleadingly claim that the Judge called for the nuking of Israel. It's a blatant distortion and a yardstick by which your own integrity is judged.

Talon;

There you go again. The forum's tripe distribution point.

 

How magnanimous of them. If the Palestinians hadn't damaged it in the first place, they wouldn't have had to repair it.

So, that gives the Palestinians license to destroy and defile the sites revered by Jews, et al, on their territory? By all means, explain the legitimacy and morality of this license to violent religious intolerance to everyone.

Oh, and on your way out, don't forget to produce your evidence of any similar destruction of the Church of the Nativity committed by the Israelis. Since this "evidence" doesn't exist, I guess I'll be waiting here a very looooooooooooong time...

 

It's their tomb. Bethlehem, however, is not Zionist property. What is ? Ponder that on your way out.

 

Then, you believe that people are idiots if they accept Israel.

I don't want for Israel to be destroyed, so why do you keep on talking about your burning need for its destruction? You seem to agree with Jason Bourne that people who accept Israel are "idiots".

Are Palestinians "idiots" for accepting Israel? If you think not, then explain such to Jason Bourne, since he argues that people who accept Israel are "idiots". Yet, instead you go on this big rant about your interests of Israel to being nuked.

 

Actually, it's not, given the fact that TJ did call for the nuking of Israel in this post:

Is there anything else you would care to mislead everyone about?

 

My argument only applies to nations which threaten to use nuclear weapons against other nations. If this issue bothers you so greatly, then why don't you advocate for Israel to abolish its nukes so that it never threatens anyone with them?

 

The caveat which you appear to want to willingly ignore, is the conditionality underpinning the post. Context in this case is significant and to ignore it, as you have done, is to misrepresent TJ's position.

 

Bingo...and there's the caveat reiterated. So no more of your nonsense please, Talon.

 

Exactly right. But then, context isn't any fraudster's strongpoint.

 

My statements assert or imply no such thing.

Unlike yourself, I've never advocated the nuclear destruction of Israel. Why are you projecting your burning need for its destruction on to others?

That impression is a fabrication of your own making.

I have never contended that the Palestinians are "idiots" for accepting Israel. Evidently, you have me confused with someone else.

Unlike yourself, I have never advocated the nuclear destruction of Israel, TJ, so if you don't want to discuss your rant expressing your interest in irradiating the Levant, I suggest you drop the subject.

If you have an issue with Jason's views, I suggest you explain to him why the Palestinians are NOT idiots for accepting Israel.

 

The Judge has never advocated the nuking of Israel, as has just been demonstrated by the demolition of your out-of-context snipe.

 

Then explain to Jason Bourne that people who accept Israel are not "idiots".

I don't want for any nation to be destroyed, yet I realize that nuclear weapons serve as deterrents and that nations which threaten to attack with nuclear weapons have the right to be nuked as a preventative measure. This rule applies to any nuclear nation. If you feel that Israel is threatened because of its nuclear threats, then Israel should abolish its nuclear weapons. Your argument seems to indicate that Israeli nuclear weapons are a great threat to Israel, with Israel being in danger of destroying itself because of such.

You ran to his defense, so explain to him why people who accept Israel are not "idiots".

 

Palestinians should never accept Israel, just as eggs should never accept the omelet.