Palestine to be recommended to UNESCO

This seems to make sense, considering that Palestinians are called "idiots" simply for accepting Israel.

 

Your "argument" applies to a self-fulfilling fantasy of your own creation that concludes with your advocacy of the nuclear destruction of Israel.

I don't need to lobby Israel to surrender its sovereignty and means of defense to accommodate people who concoct fantasy scenarios advocating the nuclear destruction of that country.

 

Does that mean that mean that moon's hatred of Israel is unconditional and extreme in your mind, as well?

 

This is, again, false. In response to such anti-Semite smears against forum members, I've created a thread where you can further express your false views instead of trashing other threads with such sillyness:

http://www.politicalforum.com/forum-help-feedback-etc/212232-need-fact-wiki.html

 

Moon does not hate Israel. Rather, Moon just doesn't know how to prevent Zionist from destroying it. We really want the best for Israel, but just don't know how more Zionists can be convinced to seek the same.

 

This is, again, true - your words speak for themselves, TJ.

So, back to the issue with Jason's views that moon has similarly endorsed. Does that mean she harbors a hatred of Israel that is unconditional and extreme, or do you reserve that accusation for Jason?

 

Then why did you claim Jason unconditionally hates Israel in the extreme for taking the same position?

 

Facts prove claims, not anti-Semite slurs against forum members.

The fact is that Jason argues that people who accept Israel are "idiots":

 

um, in the old testament he used to walk around and talk to people man to man. I remember reading that in the bible somewhere. It was later that he claimed he was too glorious to be seen with naked eyes. ie. changed the story partway through the book.

 

God has feet ? What size ?

 

Let's put it this way laddie, if God booted you in the arse they'd have to take both of you to the ED to pry his foot out of your arse.

Understand? Probably not.

 

God wears boots then ?

 

Moon boots?

 

You got that wrong:

a) the terrorists in the Middle East are the Israelis.......state sponsored terrorism is still terrorism....
and
b) although I can't speak for everybody, I am of the opinion that relatively few of those of us who are anti-Zionist are pro-Hamas per se.,,except as the democratically Palestinian government which was ignored by Israel, setting in train the whole Gaza situation..and allowing the Israelis another excuse to whine that they are victims....and to kill Palestinians.

I should think few of us are pro-Hamas as in approving of their rocket attacks and their Islamic aims.....but you know something......they do at least stick to the deals they make, which is more than Israel can say..isn't it?

 

Why only pick on Hamas and not all of the other terrorists, such as the many which exist in Israel? Not opposing terrorism means that one supports such. Why are you thus supportive and defensive of terrorism? That's the problem with one-sided platforms. By blasting one group of people with unconditional racist hatred, one demonstrates that one loves, supports and defends the racism one pretends to oppose.

As Oddquine pointed out, hardly anyone, if anyone at all, is pro-Hamas. Rather, we tend to focus on the practice of crime while you seem to focus on finger-pointing while defending crime. It's not just Hamas which is the problem. It takes two to do tango. As long as you continue to blast the Semites with unconditional racist hatred, you'll fail in realizing that you are condemning your own problem.

 

" Occupation is terrorism "

Marwan Barghouti.

 

Looks like one who is in jail for being open and honest about the truth.

 

Yes. He won't be there forever though. The law is catching up with Zionism.

 

If Israel existed on a square inch somewhere in the Middle East you would call it occupation. Because you don't think the Jews should have any part of it when it's their heritage. Jerusalem is for the Jews and we need to go back to might makes right.

 

Nope, justice makes right. Oh, and please quit with this 'jews' canard - its redundant.

 

This stands as a tribute to occupation and brutal conquest- both of which are primitive , illegal and unacceptable. That's Zionist occupation for you.

 

You are not talking about heritage....you are talking about birth right...and to have a birth right..first you have to prove the birth.......and then prove the right...and there is nothing anywhere which even hints at Jewish claims apart from the fantasies of a nomadic tribe of shepherds with self-serving embellishments (chinese whispers) added over the centuries until people started writing them down. The Old Testament is a novel..a work of fiction..nearly as good as the Chronicles of Narnia.

In fact, the Old Testament isn't a great deal different to books like "The Sinclairs of Roslin, Caithness and Goshen", written by Sinclairs for Sinclairs, which would, using Zionist criteria, make the birthright of the Sinclair descendents in Goshen, Nova Scotia the settlements of Lamsdale in Reay and Strubster in Canisbay...as their ancestor was tacksman of both in the mid-1700s.

And theoretically, according to the same kind of family gossip the Zionists use to claim that Palestine is their "entitlement", that ancestor was an illegitimate son of the 9th Earl of Caithness. In fact, given the legitimate direct line died out...that theoretical, family gossip connection would, using Zionist criteria.......not just entitle them to take back Lamsdale and Strubster, but would also entitle them to take all the estates the Earldom ever owned in Caithness.

And that illustrates the rank stupidity of Zionist claims. It is all a crock of self-serving crap to cover the greed of a crowd of secular, politically driven mostly Eastern Europeans for power......anywhere (at one time), anyhow and whoever they had to dispossess to get it. They used the religion to achieve the land and the power......as can be seen by the fact that an extremely large proportion of the "Jews" they have welcomed with fanfares and cheers and US provided resettlement money are not Jews according to religious criteria......so where is the "Jewish" state?

Might has not made right since international Law was changed as a result of WWII and, incidentally, as a result of the treatment of the Jews and others. Such a pity that the arrogant Zionist ********s take no notice of the laws put in place to protect the likes of them and think they are above laws altogether, if those laws limit their ambitions for power and land.

 

UNESCO should approve Palestinian membership with no consideration whatsoever for US of AIPAC blackmail . Kick them out for suggesting it, and any European toadies with them. When these blackmailing countries get decent governments they can be readmitted.
UNESCO is about enlightenment. It can do without the low-brows of judeo-christian militarism and occupation.

 

If America has such a major problem with being a member of UNESCO over such an minor matter, then it should retreat and isolate itself from the world. The UN will miss the extra money, but will still be able to function with it.

What I like the most about this, it that it makes it crystal clear that that the US government is not a fair player in the middle east, and that it is in no position to act as a peace broker.

 

China could fund UNESCO with its small change- but it doesn't want to humiliate America- yet . Arab States could too, but the old dynastic regimes are corrupted by submission to capitalism and usury. Perhaps Chavez will step up to the crease.