"Pro-lifers" want to ban abortion....fine...

Discussion in 'Abortion' started by Gorn Captain, Feb 18, 2013.

  1. Gemini_Fyre

    Gemini_Fyre New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2011
    Messages:
    2,087
    Likes Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're right, it is a cakewalk, higher thinking makes life a little easier.
     
  2. Phil Osoraptor

    Phil Osoraptor New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2013
    Messages:
    72
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Taxes taken will never be distributed only to those who paid in, only in the way they want, and only in amounts they have already paid. This will never happen.

    "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

    The Constitution specifically states that "We the People", "do ordain and establish this Constitution", for the very reasons of providing "common defence" and "general Welfare".

    Common defense and general welfare cannot be provided for by money from one individual only going back to that one individual. It's unconstitutional on its face and thereby void outright.
    For one to be considered under the statement "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness" in the Declaration of Independence, then one must be beyond the womb and able to survive. If I grant you that a fetus is a baby even at the instant of conception, then you must grant me that the rights of this baby cannot outweigh the rights of the mother since the rights of one cannot diminish the rights of another.

    The mother already has life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The "baby" at conception has life, but not liberty, and neither a pursuit of happiness nor the yet the ability to pursue happiness, or even the ability to survive outside the aforementioned womb at the instant of conception.

    I take my opinions straight from the standpoint of the Constitution and Declaration of Independence that way I don't let my personal morals enter into my opinions about the rights of all individuals.
     
  3. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There were Republican Presidents who stated they were against abortion, yet, they did not issue an Executive Order to ban abortions. They could have done something if they were really anti-abortion.
     

Share This Page