No anyone who bought the whole government 9/11 fairy tale, questions none of it and defends it is either a government stooge or a cognitive dissonant person. That's especially true given the mountain of evidence pointing to an obvious coverup.
No one needs to be a pilot to know 9/11 was never legitimately investigated. No one needs to be a pilot to read the NTSB crash investigation manual. And if one is and hasn't read it is not a pilot. Perhaps knows how to fly an airplane but is not a real pilot. No one needs to be a pilot to be able to read and understand the many comments about 9/11 from seasoned pilots.
Ah one out of every 50 trolling posts gets back to the topic. And I tend to agree, so the questions are why would morticians lie about such a note? Why would this story even come up if it's not true? To add drama? Perhaps, the author is about to publish a book after all. But suppose such a note was really found? Then that raises many more questions. And that's the problem with the cognitive dissonant person (or government stooge), the questions are never directed at the official narrative and always directed at those who don't bend over so easily like weak minded individuals. If you never ask questions, especially from an entity that is a known pathological liar, you are just a useless lock step robot. To re-quote: "Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." - Thomas Jefferson And I'll add another from the same patriot just for the stooges: "The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first." - Thomas Jefferson
Bob, due to your sadness Watch this video. Also watch the video handed to you by Max. An excellent presentation of the last moments of #77
I've seen all the 9/11 bullsh-t. It was popular about 10 years ago The only qualification to believe it was, you had to be an idiot.
I'm fully aware of that, however: Point PC-2: The Reported Phone Calls from Barbara Olson http://www.consensus911.org/point-pc-2/ So if you're trying to convince me the official narrative has any basis in reality, you're wasting your time. If you can't question one single thing about the official narrative, then you are truly a lost creature. Furthermore none of that has anything to do with my point. NO PARTS MATCH, NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF AA77, NO CREDIBILITY. Now I'll fully admit that it could very well have been a large commercial airliner that crashed into the Pentagon and it could very well have been AA77, however without the physical evidence, there is NO CONCLUSIVE PROOF. Furthermore, there is so much evidence of a deliberate coverup all over the 9/11 story that only a stunned fool buys the whole enchilada without question. The 9/11 victims' families don't buy it. The 9/11 Commission don't buy their own report. Why in **** would you? Never mind I know why you would. It was a rhetorical question.
And what qualifications do you have that anyone should believe anything you have to post? 1. You have none. 2. You are completely anonymous and trying to convince readers that you know better than many experts and the NTSB manual. 3. You bought the entire 9/11 fairy tale without question despite all the contradictory evidence and despite the fact that the overwhelming majority of the 9/11 documents/evidence is still classified and much of the rest has been deliberately destroyed. 4. You defend the official narrative with all its gaping holes like a rabid zealot. 5. There's more but I think that's more than enough for your qualifications. So who's really the idiot?
Translation: Correct, Max. Thousands of government employees in the military and civilian agencies have conspired to fool you. Only smart people like myself can see the truth! Disagreed.
There are over 60,000 airline pilots in the US and you've chosen to believe a handful over the thousands who said the conspiracy theories are bullshit.
Making up sh-t again I see.LOLOLOL You are really, really, really, firkin delusional. You have never seen me defend the entire narrative. We never even talked about the entire narrative. We know some things are hidden.
Not to forget, when the government approached these tens of thousands of people to lie, common sense says there was a percentage who would not lie for the government. They obviously had to kill them, to keep them quiet.
Is it asking too much for you to identify some of these pieces? The early photos showed no large pieces at all, no landing gear assemblies, no engines. There were some small pieces on the front yard, but they could easily have been hand-carried. You have drunk the Kool Aid madam, but reality does not support your fantasy.
I'm sorry to tell you Margot, but in that picture you have provided there is nothing visible that suggests the presence of a Boeing airliner. Nothing. That's the problem--the closer one looks, the more the official conspiracy theory falls apart. It is not a valid theory because all the facts contradict it.
I am not going to post 20 photos for you.. That hole in the Pentagon is HUGE.. You can search google images with the criteria I gave you. This isn't rocket science.
The hole you are so fascinated with was not caused by AA77. The story fails. The hole you see was mostly caused by pre-placed High Explosive devices, as referenced by several people there, including April Gallop. Many of those military personnel reported the odor of cordite. The place was blown up to get rid of the financial records and the congressional auditors examining them seeking to find what happened to $2.3 trillion. Wake up and smell the napalm Margot--the place was bombed to end the audit. Mission Accomplished.
I'm ambivalent on the Loch Ness situation, but find chemtrails to be unlikely. Possible, but unlikely. The bigger fantasy is the one you embrace--that AA77 struck the Pentagon. Be careful when throwing stones from a glass house.
The Pentagon was undergoing renovations when the suicidal hijacker struck. Do you think they collaborated with the Feds to stop the audit... or do you think the Pentagon scrambled to bomb the Pentagon to take advantage of the attack on the WTC?
The pilots who contradict the US government's narrative aren't citing "conspiracy theories", they cite the many facts that contradict that narrative. But you can certainly provide a link to those "thousands" who contradict the pilots who wrote those articles, right? So far I don't see one. OTOH I posted one from a very well seasoned pilot, would you like to see more from many other pilots? Or do you choose to only believe what you invent? And that's the problem with those who defend the official story, everything, every scientific analysis, every piece of incontrovertible evidence that challenges the official story is labeled a "conspiracy theory", as if that's a valid defense mechanism that means anything.
I already addressed that Margot. You're right they don't do autopsies but they may be fully aware of what the pathologists discovered. Is it a reg flag? Maybe, maybe not. Is the whole story fabricated? Maybe. But again, why would it be? For you all you have is knee jerk answers that ALWAYS serve to defend the official narrative. For me I keep this stuff in the back of my mind to be addressed if and when there may be more information that rises to the surfaces that supports or rejects the story.
So far that's all I see from you. The tone of all your posts so far tell me you're FOS. Show me a post from you that questions or even better contradicts the official narrative in any significant way. Or if you haven't written one, why is that? Post something that questions it then and show me how wrong I am about you. "Some things"? No, a huge majority of things are hidden, some by the 9/11 Commission's own admission, others discovered many years later. And still others we have yet to discover.
