Settlements in Judea and Samaria are legal

continued from previous

To those that think differently without any substantiation I say… No amount of Monday morning quarter backing is going to help your belated dreaming…
There was no ARAB country in the middle east called Palestine... the place was called the Ottoman Empire for 400 years until 1917 when the British Forces Liberated it from the Turks and received a Mandate to manage it… They governed it for the next 30 years until 1948..

The Brits recognized the right of the Jews to the Land of their forefathers...
Palestine Arab nationalism to whatever degree it is conscious ideal today, is a product of recent political currents. Until the 1920’s, no such national community had even existed in Palestine. This is why the Balfour Declaration and the League of Nations Mandates charged the Jews of the National Home with guaranteeing the civil and religious right of other inhabitants... (The Arabs, Christians, Druze, Circassians, Kurds, Armenians, Bosnians, Moghrabim [North Africans], Egyptians, Syrian, Bedouins... were the other inhabitants.)

No mention was made of other National Rights of other inhabitants..., as it was recognized that the only NATIONAL CLAIM to the Area was that of the Jews...!!

However, the FICTION of Palestine Arab Nationality is still being exploited. If the Palestinian Arabs were in fact a separate nationality, their anger should have been directed against Jordan and Egypt since these were the two countries that invaded duly “Reconstituted Israel in 1948”, and retained a substantial amount of Real Estate. (Jordan... Judea and Samaria and Egypt the Gaza area...) and never even considered creating a Palestinian Arab Entity there for nineteen years...

Now if you had an Atlas from let say from 1517 on to 1917 when the British took over... you would have noticed that the place was called “THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE” for FOUR HUNDRED years and NOTHING ELSE...!

There was NEVER a Palestine…! No independent Arab or Palestinian State ever existed in Palestine. When the distinguished Arab-American historian, Princeton University Prof. Philip Hitti, testified against partition before the Anglo-American Committee in 1946, he said: "There is no such thing as 'Palestine' in history, absolutely not. In fact, Palestine is never explicitly mentioned in the Qur'an, rather it is called "the holy lands" (al-Arad al-Muqaddash)

At that time; Palestinian Arabs did not view themselves as having a separate identity. When the First Congress of Muslim-Christian Associations met in Jerusalem in February 1919 to choose Palestinian representatives for the Paris Peace Conference, the following resolution was adopted, quote:-

We consider Palestine as part of Arab Syria, as it has never been separated from it at any time. National, religious, linguistic, natural, economic and geographical bonds connect us with it... Unquote.

In 1937, a local Arab leader, Auni Bey Abdul-Hadi, told the Peel Commission, which ultimately suggested the partition of Palestine: "There is no such country [as Palestine]! 'Palestine' is a term the Zionists invented! There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our country was for centuries part of Syria."

The representative of the Arab Higher Committee to the UN submitted a statement to the General Assembly in May 1947 that said, "Palestine was part of the Province of Syria" and that, "politically, the Arabs of Palestine were not independent in the sense of forming a separate political entity." A few years later, Ahmed Shuqeiri, later the chairman of the PLO, told the Security Council: "It is common knowledge that Palestine is nothing but southern Syria."

Palestinian Arab nationalism is largely a post World War I phenomenon that did not become a significant political movement until after 1967 Six-Day War [since the PLO was created by Egypt in 1964]... and Israel's liberation of Judea and Samaria (West Bank) from the occupying forces of Jordan.

 

The Israelis are facing the same kind of enemies our pioneers did. That's why America-haters support the Arabs.

 

The North Vietnamese were the aggressors. The Americans lost because our South Vietnamese allies were cowards, crooks, and collaborators. Chickenhawks were also responsible for Kuwait losing to Iraq and Lebanon losing to Syria, among many other defeats going back to the Romans losing to the barbarians in 476 AD, or even the mercenary-hiring Carthaginians losing to the patrician warriors of Rome around 200 BC. If America-haters pompously insist that we were the aggressors, the North Vietnamese were rewarded punitive damages by taking over the whole of South Vietnam.

 

Dude, you bring to the table a hack from 2001 entitled ....wait for it, folks.....' The Myth Of The Palestinian People ' ?

For your own information- everybody else already knows- the United Nations recognised the Palestinian State on November 29th , 2012. The hacks who wrote your 11 year old swill have probably moved up to porno mags by now.

- - - Updated - - -

You mean the Brits ? Mexicans ? Indigenous Indians ? The Inquisition ?

 

Proof that your side is preaching nonsense can be derived from the fact that you illogically expect a strong country to respond weakly when attacked by a weak country, just like you want us to be pushovers not pushing our advantage to quickly confiscate the weakly defended Muslim oil. You live in a fantasyworld if you believe that the Arabs wouldn't exterminate the Jews if the Arabs had the military advantage. You also accuse Israel of doing something I criticized the Israelis for not doing. If they know where the terrorist leaders are, why don't they kill them immediately instead of waiting for an incident to justify the assassination to diplomats who all hate Jews anyway no matter what they do? Pre-emption is necessary for survival, but Holocaust-lovers don't care about that.

 

Since when does the Right claim to believe that might makes right?