Stupid Liberals vs Evil Conservatives

Yeah easy.

5-4 Supreme Court vote allowing the state to take your property

5-4 Supreme Court vote on upholding the 2nd Ammendment

Obamacare

Taxing the job creators.

Funding the Military

The list goes on and on and on.

I can't believe this actually has to be spelled out.

 

Yes, just like your opinion. That's why this is in Political Opinions and beliefs.

 

The use of the word "Stupidest" makes your remark a "Pot calling the kettle black" moment. All because someone has different opinions than you do does not make them stupid. I was talking to someone at school the other day and mentioned that I love watching "The Rachel Maddow Show". His first remark was "Rachel Maddow? Man is she stupid." I pointed out that she has a PhD in Political Science from Oxford and was a Rhode Scholar. She is not stupid by any means.

All because I lean towards a more socially liberal viewpoint (but I hold rather conservative fiscal viewpoints) does not mean I think that conservatives are stupid. There ARE stupid conservatives just like there ARE stupid Liberals. However, just because I disagree with someone does not make them stupid. We need to stop calling each other names and actually try to work together and focus on our common point of views. We all have interests in common and we should use them to work together.

 

I see no proof, just political rhetoric.
Obamacare = romneycare= a program both parties had in the works for years. Just passed by a D but both sides concocted it and knew eventually would be passed.
Taxing the job creators - tax cut of the last 10 yrs isn't bringing any jobs. We have less jobs because labor rates are cheaper elsewhere. Not because of taxes.
I can agree on military - RWers would like to have a military that can control the entire world. Ds, not so much.

I can't believe you believe the crap you see on TV or radio as true.

 

The problem is, each side pretends that it has to be their way or no way.
Compromise is a lost word. What works for 1 will not work for all. But there can be a way that works for most.

 

Better talk to Ubama then, he refused to work with republicans at all. Told them they had to sit at the back of the bus. Why is it the republicans always are the ones who have to reach across the isle? When was the last time you heard a democrat say we need to reach across the isle and work with the republicans?

 

Conservatives live in reality and liberals live in a fantasy world of what they want the world to look like in their utopia.

 

These RINO's and moderates follow long standing Republican policies. How many Republican Presidents have been dismissed by the current GOP hard-liners? Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, Eisenhower...all Progressives and Presidents that would be considered too liberal or RINOish to get elected today. Given the direction the GOP is headed, Ronald Reagan will one day be a RINO. I used to be a Republican. One day I realized that the party I was in for over 20 years was no longer the party I joined at 18. As a Fiscally conservative, Non-Christian I have no place in today's Republican Party.

 

How is that political rhetoric when I cite specific examples.

Explain your BS.

Which is completely false. It passed 99% on liberal votes. Do I really have to dig up the votes on it and embarrass you?

That's your opinion but it doesn't change your original question of the difference between the two groups and this is one of them.

Ds would rather strip down the military and hope everyone in the world holds hands and sings. We get your goal.

If you are going to lie and claim everything I said was political rhetoric without providing a shred of evidence then there is nothing more to say.

I gave you specific fact based answers on how the groups differer and you weren't even honest enough to admit it.

Go ahead, prove those 2 Supreme Court votes I cited were fake and didn't fall along party lines. Let's see your evidence.

 

President Obama says it all the time. It is the Republican talking-heads that say that compromise is wrong and evil.

 

Amen. Abject intransigence is rarely ever a good thing.

 

Just like all Ubama's rhetoric, he talks, no action.

 

As any non-feelings based justice would. Only a hyperemotional person would think we have nothing to learn from sources outside the USA. Despite what you feel, the Constitution does not ban acting intelligently.

Again, reality disagrees with you. Conservative justices appointed Bush to office, in flagrant violation of the Constitution, and admitted their decision was so awful and unconstitutional that it should never be used for precedent.

And you fully approve, due to your embrace of your master Alinksy's "the ends always justify the means" relative morality. The fact that every recount showed Gore with more legal votes in Florida under every counting standard was irrelevant to you. You wanted Bush to win, so you justified the election theft. If it weren't for relative morality, you'd have no morality at all.

Completely false. Again, you _feel_ those things are true, despite the reality of red states being the parasite states. You cling to the government teat with a vice-like grip, but the ends justify the means for you, so you declare that it doesn't count as a subsidy when you get it. You want to freeload, so you declare freeloading is noble.

No, it's an stellar example of you "feeling" that what you think is bad must be banned. Liberals take the rational view.

We here in the reason-based community -- the liberals -- can only shake our heads sadly at your type. You emotional people will never understand us rational people, which is why you respond to reason with rage.

 

and yet it is Republicans talking about the fact that there will be no compromise. Many feel that compromise is a bad thing and there should never be any sort of compromise.

 

He is bad. He's bad for all of America, but you've listened too much to Rachel Madcow, Chris, tingle up my leg Mathews and all the other left wing propagandists on every freaking news network.

 

So, if Ubama is the great compromiser, why hasn't he compromised?

 

Liberals eat their young. Nuff said.

 

All Ubama wants to do is destroy the Constitution and instill himself as dictator and you libs are all for that...enough said!!!

 

If enough people ate their young, that'd reduce both the food shortage and overpopulation problems we're facing today. Especially if it were.."evil" and "stupid" people doing so.

 

Most liberals are too busy going to school and getting over-educated. We don't have time for kids. We leave the over-breeding to the uneducated Baby factories in the republican party.

 

Aren't you the one who absurdly attributed recent increases in food prices to "Obamanomics", instead of well-known natural disasters and the increased demand of beef from China (the overpopulated nation of Hell)?

 

Hey, at least we do not think that education is a bad thing. I have heard plenty of conservatives put down and condemn any sort of advanced education.

 

So all inflation is due to natural disasters and increased demand from China....BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!

 

And just who has the department of education ever educated? Education in this country is a complete disaster, yet libs want more government intervention, because it's worked so well in the past....LMFAO!!!!

 

That's not "inflation"??? That's actual increases in REAL prices.

"Inflation" is: you and your employees represent an economy, and you pay them $5 an hour and you get $500 per day in gross income (on average) for the business, and to maintain your lifestyle, you have to spend $75,000 a year. Later, you pay the employees $10 an hour and you get $1,000 per day in gross income for the business, and to maintain your lifestyle, you have to spend $150,000 a year. It's a superficial thing.

ADJUSTED for inflation, food prices are rising because of increased demand from overpopulated nations.