Stupid Liberals vs Evil Conservatives

But since nearly every liberal on this board and in the real world acts and thinks like Alaskan_sol, the conclusion is that you're being willfully blind to how real liberals think.

Most conservatives rely heavily on the tactic of telling the liberals what they really think. If conservatism wasn't morally and intellectually bankrupt, conservatives could just tell the truth about liberals. They don't.

That's why it's so easy to shut up conservatives in the real world. I just say "I'm a liberal. Are you saying those awful things apply to me?". That gets them mumbling an excuse, and then making a quick retreat.

 

Classic...

7. Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal. To many liberals, all one needs to do to be wise, intelligent, compassionate, open minded, and sensitive is to BE LIBERAL.

 

If it wasn't so destructive to society, it would be hilarious.

<Pictured Image>

Liberal standing surrounded by millions with his arms folded across his chest...beaming with pleasure, standing waste deep in crap along with everyone else.

<Caption>

"Man...I do good work. My (*)(*)(*)(*) don't stink."

 

Nothing is going to penetrate your antireality-bubble. Cults are like that.

And note that I'm not saying conservatives are cultists. I'm pointing out how a select few act like cultists.

 

Exactly. And that same superior attitude carries over to their president... the man who gets credit he doesn't deserve and absolutely no blame.

 

You're right about that, Shangrila. If you have to tell us how smart you are... chances are, you ain't.

 

The proof is in the pudding. Obama is a Marxist in democratic clothing. Everything he does is an attempt to move toward a Socialized and Marxist country. This is the Antithesis of what we were in 1776.

 

Our Industry is not controlled by the government. Individuals still own their land. There is nothing Marxist about this President. There is nothing Communistic about this President. At most, the only thing you could call him may be an Oligarchist. Our country really is not heading towards Socialism. It HAS been an Oligarchy for quite some time now. I would say you should be outraged about this, but our Founders were Oligarchists themselves.

 

How many 'regulateds' equal one 'controlled?'

There's not a single business in the USA that's not touched by govt regulations. From banks & Wall Street to restaurants & fast food outlets being scolded by Michelle Obama's arm-twisting food nazi program. How far from regulated to controlled?

The question is HOW MUCH GOVT INTERFERENCE IS TOO MUCH?

Many of us think Obama's taken us past that point and plan to vote him out of office.

Oligarchy or not.

 

The confusion regarding Obama is this, IMHO.

Liberals and the most current breed of their ideology Progressives use the tried and true method of gradualism regarding changes in society. Conservatives are the curb so it doesn't get out of hand.

Basically, Mr. Obama and his numerous and assorted team, threw gradualism to the wind (messiah and a super majority spurred this no doubt)....and went the untried radical hard left leap so to speak. Healthcare was the big ticket leap, and they also gave the impression....more of that was coming down the pipe.

That caused a rather large reaction as witnessed in 2010.

The confusion comes in because of that. Marxist. Communist. Anti-Imperialist. He and his team came out swinging for the fence...the far left fence.

Add some stupid bowing protocol on his part, some dumb comments by his wife regarding her nonexistent pride in America, a Churchill bust sent back to the Brits on his first day in the oval office, a nagging affiliation with an America hating Rev Wright, some undenied ties to home grown terrorists (Ayers), Communist/Marxist family members, putting Van Jones a radical Communist on his White House team, throwing Israel under bus (Jews and many others perceptions), the whole refusal to release his records for potential scrutiny of his educational years political leanings.

Actually...I am not sure anything other picture COULD have been painted portraying Mr. Obama.

 

Obama finally passing, after decades of attempts, a health care plan that addresses some of the 50 million Americans who don't have health care coverage like is available in every other industrialized nation on earth is "untried radical hard left"? Hardly, IMO.

The only confusion about Obama is that he was lucky enough to step into the worst economic crisis since 1933 left by his predecessor that many of the ingorant and mislead tag him with.

 

Ahhh, there's the Bush card.

Barack is the 'criminal' and GW is 'society' -- not Obama's fault!!!!

 

Maybe it some sand box thing with libs from their childhood.

I'll trade you my race card, for two of your feed the world cards and a The Earth is melting cuz of us button.

NO TAKE BACKS! You Indian giv......oops.

 

You say Bush is responsible, not I didn't.

Ah, there's the Barack card.

 

It must be so nice for him to be the teflon man, where all blame he deserves is not allowed to stick to him, nor his lies. Eventually, he will get even more cocky which will be his downfall.

 

Could be...

Seriously, people who support Obamacare aren't STUPID... but their failure to see past their emotional attachment to the idea is downright scary. Putting our medical records in the hands of the govt when they claim opposition to the Patriot Act is insane. (that's a step above STUPID)

 

He may already be there... Hail Mary!

 

And equally stupid, if not more, is allowing the gov't to invade your privacy, but won't let them help heal you if sick.

 

This explains the inbred, hivemind attitude of the entertainment industry.

I think this is a big part of why so many liberals literally cannot understand the conservative position on an issue from the conservative point of view. Because they never hear it and so it sounds alien to them. A conservative can parrot a liberal's position right back to them exactly as the liberal thinks/feels about it and still simply disagree with it. But a typical liberal is unable to do this with a conservative without building a straw man.

I have a theory on this. I think the liberal ideology tends to draw in people who are generally more emotional and feel some kind of deep internal need for validation. This is why the victim/martyr card is so appealing to them. This isn't true with all liberals of course, but I'm talking more about the bleeding heart faction. However, I do think many members of the more stoic intellecual faction are prone to needing validation for their intellect as well.

The psychology term for this behavior is called backward rationalizing. It's where you start with a desired end result in mind and then work backwards to piece together an explanation for why it must be right. To be fair, most people use this in some form or fashion everyday in subtle and harmless ways (such as justifying why it's okay to cheat on your diet with that scoop of icecream). But liberals tend to do this on a grand scale with things as serious as life and death and freedom and bondage.

Identity politics is one of the worst things about liberalism to me. And what is so ironic is that it does the complete opposite of everything liberals claim to want. They claim to want everyone to get along and stop segregation and prejudice, but THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT IDENTITY POLITICS DOES! It divides us all along every arbitrary line imaginable and says that we have to all be equal while treating everyone differently. That doesn't even make sense. It's not only crazy, but it's crazy making.

Peter Pan Syndrome. I just addressed this in another thread. They want all the freedom of adulthood with all the lack of responsibility of childhood. Real life doesn't work this way. That's called having your cake and eating it too.

I think a lot of these people just subconcsiously identify with the bad guy and so they always try to turn him into a victim. Which is a completely self-defeating argument. Let's follow the logic here, shall we?

If someone commits a crime, we can't blame him because he was just a victim of society. But now we're holding society responsible. We can't blame society because society is just the result of something else. So who's to blame for why society is messed up? And then once we've established that, then who's to blame for messing those people up? And then we just repeat this little dance ad infinitum. What we end up with is a never-ending chain of excuses where no one is ever held accountable for what's been done because the blame can always be shifted one generation further back.

It's not about actually knowing or understanding anything. It's just about blindly embracing everything. Whether it's healthy or not. This is exactly what the human immune system does when it contracts HIV.

 

Like Charles but I think he's slightly off.Liberals constantly talk about
Smart.Everything their Pols do and candidates talk about is Smart.
Every Liberals guy has smart Policy.In fact it is not possible for a Liberal
to talk long about a fellow peer w/o mention of Smart.
Therefore Liberals feel themself Smart and Conservatives consider themself
Fair & Honest.

 

You're kidding, right?

 

Excellent post, Unifier. Your observations are even better than the OP's.

 

How 'smart' was Obama to tick off the entire Catholic Church?

There's another thing liberals don't understand... the meaning of the word 'smart.'

 

Unifier, I completely concur....and now for the comical anecdote to you stating reality in your post.

The liberals didn't hear the message. Their brains glazed over. Missed the point. Reality check posting went right over their heads.

Punch line....go to my first sentence, first words. They see that, and then run in mental inner mind circles, fingers flailing and pointing...PARROT! SEE! PARROT!

This is what they do. Ask a an awakened to reality ex liberal if you can find one. Hilarious if it wasn't so (*)(*)(*)(*)ed destructive to our society.