Stupid Liberals vs Evil Conservatives

oops. A typo I did not catch. Thanks for pointing that out! It is fixed.

 

It's an increase in prices because the dollar is worth less.

 

The dollar is worth a small fraction now, than it was worth in the 1800's. Does that mean that we're economically worse off now than in the 1800's? You have to first of all, specify whether you mean "worth less" in relative OR absolute terms, when talking about anything, for instance, the USD.

But the reason why 1 USD now won't buy as much beef as it did years ago, is mainly due to the fact that there's a lot more people eating beef these days.

 

Think?

Compared to the half-baked idiocy the republicans post, I don't THINK I'm smarter than they are. I AM smarter than they are. At least, I research the issues and quote my sources, sources which are a little more credible than Fox News, Batty Bachman, and various GOP talking (and empty) heads.

Live with it.

 

What exactly is an 'uneducated baby factory'..o educated one? Oops, I meant 'over-educated'. Nevermind..it's a slur, isn't it. Code for republican women. You 'over-educated' types are so cleaver with your codes and slurs. Is there some reference manual you all use? Or do you just pull these things out of thin air? Possibly a minor you take while pursuing your "over-education"? Cleaver Slurs-101? By the way, educated one, the word baby shouldn't be capitalized as it is a 'common noun'.

 

If that's the reason, beef should be cheaper with more people buying it. Isn't that how it works? Isn't it like a plasma TV? A few years ago they were thousands of dollars and now they're under $500??? Isn't that how Ubamacare is suppose to work, the more people, the cheaper?. Now, you're telling me it's the opposite???


What was a loaf of bread in 1913 and what is it now?

 

I dont know what youre talking about here.

I don't know, don't care.

 

Whoever wrote that article is very observant. That is liberals to a tee.

Their underlying problem, the one which explains all the things in his list, is that liberals tend to deny the existence of an infinite Deity. Without this understanding, of course they can't understand things around themselves.

 

Its sad you actually believe this. Please quote the part of the oath they take that states international law should ever be considered.

The stupidity is not understanding that when you judge US Law you refer to US Law not forign law.

Would you cite Saudi Arabia's laws on ciminal penalties when debating crimes here? Doesn't exactly fit with that intelligence argument does it?

Which is completely false and I challenge you to submit their wording where they said exactly that. Deal with reality not a perceived notion of it.

Never once said that. Just another lie.

LOL Which again is completely false and demands your evidence proving this laughable claim.

Now its time change the argument isn't it LOL The question wasn't who consumes more but what they stand and vote for. Are you really going to sit there and claim liberals aren't for universal health care when it only passed with 99% liberal votes? Do I have to pull down the voting list and embarrass you further?

Which I've already proven laughably false. You run on pure emotion on this one. Anyone who claims "they love each other" is reason to change the law is operating solely on emotion.


Thanks for proving my point.

 

Oh my, oh my...

 

This points out a very disturbing thing which the group called liberals tends to believe more often than I see cons believe it.

Education has nothing to do with intelligence, nor with it's opposite, often referred to as 'stupidity'. There are very stupid people who can get in college, do well in college, and graduate from college. For many people, Oxford and Rhodes Scholar-ship shows little more than persistence.

Education provides knowledge. It does not provide intelligence. You have a lot of intelligence or a little intelligence when you enter school. When you leave school, you have the same amount of intelligence as when you entered. You do however have more knowledge.

Maddow is fairly intelligent, though not because she went to school. She has more cleverness than intelligence though, and these two shouldn't be confused either.

Barack Obama won the Nobel Prize. But Barack Obama is not a highly intelligent person. He is however, a highly EDUCATED person.

And winning the Nobel Prize is even hotter than Oxford/Rhodes.

So did Gore. And Gore, well...Gore is more of average intelligence.

 

This is what we get when we push for affirmative action. What is obvious here is this man, who was a self-admitted mediocre high school student who smoked pot and snorted drugs, was allowed to enter colleges that he would not have been qualified to enter based on his grades, but was allowed to enter because of his color. What's worse, is that because he was a person of color, he was probably given better grades because of the lowered expectations the liberal professors had for this minority. This is also why he was allowed to advance to Harvard without any true merit. This is also why he was made president of the Harvard Law Review, without any experience on the Law Review, having never written a review on any law, (which is the purpose of the Harvard Law Review). He is the epitome of the token Black male. This was Harvard's, "Look, we are not racists" moment. This is why Obama refuses to release any of his school records or writings. His grades are not reflective of previous Law Review Presidents, and his papers will demonstrate a poor knowledge of the subject matter of his chosen field. His actions as president shows that he doesn't understand the Constitution.

 

You cite specific examples, but I don't follow your posts so I don't have a clue what you're referring to. And you provide no where for me to research your specific examples.

And you did not and can not prove, taxing businesses loses jobs.

 

Yes. Wouldn't it be a world-shaker if it were true that the difference between the confidence and discernment of conservatives (on the whole) and the blatanly lesser confidence and discernment of admitted liberals (on the whole) is actually an understanding of the inescapable necessity of Cause?

 

Taking money away from someone will discourage them from spending as much as they did before, on unnecessary items. That is obvious to anyone with even a modicum of intelligence. Mod Edit for personal insult

And taxing businesses doesn't cause the LOSS of jobs, it causes the FAILURE TO CREATE as many new ones.

 

I suspect you may be right about his color currying him favor.

And I also suspect you may be right that that is why he wants his school records sealed. Actually, there is no other reason even worth consideration, that I can imagine.

 

Cause? From a human point or a spirit point?

 

And the "demand" is there. China has a 9%GDP growth almost solely because the demand is there.

 

And your point? Is china growing because of our taxes? Or because they build stuff cheaper?

 

Great example of #2.

2. Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That's not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they're probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals.

Rachel Maddow is a partisan shrew. Although you're right, I wouldn't necessarily call her stupid. People who watch her, however....

Let's just say they're getting their info through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals.

 

7 Reasons Why Conservatives Are Evil would be appreciated. It'd be nice to see something added besides whining 'no we're not!'

P.S. Who's 'us?' Gotta mouse in your pocket?

 

And Conservative...? You are the first one that only rely in Conservative information sources :-S

 

See, you seem to be missing the big picture here.

Republicans were ELECTED to STOP Obama's socialist takeover of America. If they worked with him, they'd actualy be going against the wishes of the people who put them in office.

This isn't about 'feelings' mamooth, this is about cold, hard facts:

 

Actually, there's only ONE conservative information source in America's MSM and that's FOX NEWS.

As opposed to most major newspapers, network news shows, schools, news magazines, etc. etc. etc.

Like it said in the OP, liberals have to make a conscious effort to hear conservatively slanted news while those on the right are constantly bombarded with leftwing 'news.'

Lefties should be thankful there's only one conservative outlet... wonder how they'd feel if everytime they turned on network news, they got a blast of rightwing views?

 

From my point of view CNN, MSNBC, New York Times... are rightwing channels. With a difference. They are not so absurdly radical and extremist like Fox News, that more than right wing looks like a fascist channel.

And I am giving this opinion that the left/right depends of the point of view of the person. And for me all, liberals and conservative are rightwing.