The despicable lie of CLIMATE JUSTICE!!!

The Philippines was listed as the number one country affected by climate change.

https://www.amnesty.org.uk/philippi...pines is made up,the southeast coast of China.

Since 1990 the population has increased 83% and hunger has been reduced by 50%.

The GDP increased from $44B to almost $400B. An 800% increase!

In 1990 63% of people in the Philippines had access to electricity. Today it is 95%.

CC is supposed to be bad right? Keep lying.

 

Hmm puzzling. In the middle of a climate crisis the 110 million Filipinos are eating better than 60 million did in 1990. How could that be? Oh they are not white!

 

Daily caloric intake 1990-2019.

https://ourworldindata.org/food-supply

Africa- up from 2321 calories to 2585

South America- up from 2603 to 3051

Asia- up from 2403 to 2913

World- up from 2579 to 2939

Again thank you climate change. The average person on earth is eating almost 400 calories a day more than in 1990.

 

The current "climate change" narrative is all about "carbon credits".

 

It sounds like you're onboard with keeping Africans poor, starving, and sick though... as long as they keep slaving away to mine 500,000 lbs of earth to produce 1 EV battery - right??

And of course they can't be allowed to industrialize themselves, because that would cause more global warming, right??

I have news for ya friend - you're not on the right side of history or science when you endorse the policies of the global elite who are pushing the "CO2 boogeyman" narrative.

The entire fraud is about power - the power to control all energy, and the power to control people.

Wake up.

 

The more likely your offspring will not live that long, the more likely you are to have a lot of kids to increase the chances that at least one will somehow make it to adult age and carry on your gene pool.

 

Nice try I guess. Life expectancy in the world increased from 64 to almost 73 from 1990 to the present.

https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/WLD/world/life-expectancy

I know it is hard to have your entire ideology destroyed like that but it needs to happen.

 

You nailed it.

 

Let's keep in mind when we talk about world statistics. 90% of the world is not white. I guess you could claim that lighter skinned Muslims in Iran and Central Asia are whites and bump that number up a few points but by any measure 85% of the people on earth are not white!

So when we talk about improved nutrition, improved life expectancy and reduced infant mortality we are talking about POC! This climate crisis is a lie! While populations have increased and fossil fuel production have increased the quality of life for the average person on earth(Not white) is much better than it was 30 years ago.

 

Rampart mentioned infant mortality. Oops forgot his links and charts. So let me retort.

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.DYN.IMRT.IN

Since 1990 infant mortality around the world has dropped from 65 deaths per 1000 births to 27 deaths. A 58% decline! That's good!

 

Democrats have used lies and propaganda for decades. They cannot win by trying to convince folks so they need to use fear.

 

So let's review.

Libo lie-The earth is in an environmental crisis caused by white people. The result is death, destruction and suffering of non white people whose ecosystems are being destroyed. White people's fault! America's fault!

Facts-Nutrition, life expectancy and health have all improved significantly around the world in the last 30 plus years despite significant population growth and increased fossil fuel production.

If climate change caused all of this we need more of it.

https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/20...ry-global-conditions-charts-life-span-poverty

 

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/world-population-in-extreme-poverty-absolute?time=1820..latest

There is a chart in this link that shows the change in extreme poverty in the world. In 1990 36% of the world lived in extreme poverty as defined by $1.90 a day or less to live on.

The chart ends in 2015. 12% of the world was in extreme poverty in 2015. That number was 9% in 2020. So extreme poverty declined from 36% to 12% during a time we are supposed to be in an environmental crisis.

Democrats might disagree with me but better nutrition, higher life expectancy, lower infant mortality and lower extreme poverty are good things!

 

Here is the typical libos lies about CC. Listen carefully.

Everything she said is total steaming horse caca. No basis in fact at all. I'm sure the little retard believes it but thank goodness there are people like me to tell the real truth.

 

Yep, man can't affect the environment, things like smog, acid rain are just hoxes.

 

My guess is you're saying that that people cause smog and acid rain, and we have to ask ourselves if that negates the fact that as a whole humankind is better off.

My take is that we and our surroundings are in far better shape than we were 10, 20, 50, 1,000 years ago. Do you disagree?

 

Umm, yea that has all happened, because of climate change initiatives, the pursuit of better energy efficiency.
Why subsidize big oil should be the question.

 

Good grief.

The "non white world" is most of the world. Not all of them live near the rising seas.

I gave you three links that articulated the displacement of millions due to climate change. Some because sea levels have rising, some because the warming atmosphere is generating bigger, deadlier storms, and some because the land has become too dry to grow their food. You aren't required to read my kinks, but if you don’t, your credibility is greatly diminished after your bold statement in comment #2.

You say you've done your research on this issue, yet you provide no proof to back up your claim.

 

Except the difficulties you named have not come to pass.

Scientists And Media Outlets Increasingly ‘Scolded’ And ‘Pressured’ To Blame Extreme Weather On Humans

By Kenneth Richard on 27. January 2022

Media outlets are pressured by “green groups” to opportunistically claim every extreme weather event – including the ensuing damage – is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions. In recent decades there has been a deintensification of extreme weather (precipitation) events. Image Source: Koutsoyiannis, 2020 Deaths and property losses from extreme weather events have also been […]

Sorry, Texas Tribune, Texas Is Not Suffering Extreme Weather Because of Climate Change
Drought February 16, 20221
A search of Google news for phrase “climate change” found an article in the Texas Tribune in which the writer, Erin Douglas, repeats the...

Follow the Science, Yahoo News, Climate Change is Not Causing More Extreme Weather
Extreme Weather January 7, 20224
Yahoo News posted an article titled, “Extreme weather fueled by climate change hit 4 in 10 Americans where they lived in 2021,” saying climate...

Sorry, Axios, No Data Supports the Claim That Climate Change Is Causing More Extreme...
Extreme Weather November 18, 20210
A search of Google News today for the term “climate change” turns up a story from Axios in which the author, Andrew Freedman, claims...

 

It's a little easier to understand, though every bit as wrong, when one realizes that the thing undergirding and behind the global warming effort is the destruction of capitalism, as Christiana Figueres the former top UN climate dog said, and the degrowth movement.

 

Our surroundings nope, sorry

 

How have CC initiatives reduced poverty, improved nutrition, and created access to electricity and technology??

Putting a solar panel in a village of poverty stricken Africans is not a solution to their plight.

It's incredibly magnanimous of you to take credit for granting them such an upgrade, while ensuring that they continue to live in soul crushing conditions because you also endorse not allowing them to industrialize with the use of fossil fuels - which is the true engine of progress and prosperity.

 

How are small villages, or communities impacted by industrial climate change laws? Are they forced to abide by common safety practices in order to maintain profitability? That's far more beneficial than harmful as evidenced.

 

Yes, sure, okay, undue pressure may have become a thing, but that does not in any way refute the facts presented.

If you're going to refute the actual science, then do that, a piece at a time (it's a very complex issue involving dozens of scientific disciplines). Show me where they are wrong. Too many opinions on the issue are based on propaganda and right wing talking points. Or the reverse, perhaps. Show me the facts refuting the findings of at least one branch of science. What are your sources?

 

Perhaps you were unaware that the primary means of fighting cc/gw is -and has been for a decade or so- to reduce carbon footprints, sometimes even in preference over more classical and proven methods of conservation like those you mentioned.

In the UK they are cutting down live forests to make bogs or 'carbon stores'...