The End of Abortion in America is Coming Soon

Why can't you understand that forcing women to give birth against their will is reproductive slavery?

 

There's no accounting for tastes, but if I find the sex I'm having not to be dirty, I find a way to make it dirty.

 

Well there is an accounting for the "taste" that sex is dirty...but I don't want to go into it, it's not complimentary.

 

I'm sure it is more justified bigotry from the left.

 

Ya, saying sex isn't dirty is "bigotry from the left".................I guess that's how a person who thinks sex is dirty thinks....

 

Please review what you said in the quoted post. It was NOT the one where you were "saying sex isn't dirty". It was the one where you implied that sexual preferences different from your own are pathological. That is bigotry.

 

What I clearly meant was that thinking sex was dirty is pathological...... thinking sex is dirty isn't a "sexual preference"....it's pathological.



Now, if you wish to discuss "dirty sex " find a porn site........otherwise back to the topic....

 

Your claim that dissenting views on sexuality are pathological is outrageous and hateful, and quite representative of the justified bigotry readily espoused by the left.

Asking someone to ejaculate into you when you know neither of you can deal with a pregnancy is dangerous and dirty and that's the exact reason so many people are intensely sexually aroused by that behavior. That is real life for many people.

So sorry that it's not on the Dem party's list of acceptable deviances. It's remarkably common. Get out of the house one night and you'll see.

 

No, once again, I stated that thinking sex is dirty is pathological.

Now, I will not respond again on this topic, only the OP topic.

 

You justify your own bigotry while condemning others harshly for theirs. So the world goes around.

 

Either you don't understand the impact pregnancy has on women, or you just don't care because you think of them as objects to be used. That could be why you can't articulate why abortion is wrong, because it's YOUR goo sack, and how dare she!

 

I think of them as human beings capable of rising to the challenge. Capable of seeing themselves as perhaps not the most important thing in the world?

I don't have to accept the bizarre female sense of morality (I have a right to kill anything that gets in my way) in order to not hate women. We are just different.

 

If you think of them as human beings, then you wouldn't want to treat them as less. Taking away their human rights of bodily autonomy, self-determination and human dignity, and forcing them to use their bodies against their will, objectifies and dehumanizes them.

 

Call it what you want. We all know what it is. Can't face the music so you're going to kill it. Weak.

 

Having never experienced pregnancy or childbirth yourself, you are hardly qualified to determine that a woman who chooses abortion is "weak." But regardless of what you think of women who abort, do you have a right to force them to give birth? No, you don't.

 

It helps me satisfy my own personal moral standards for myself to speak out against something as disgusting and evil as aborting a pregnancy. It doesn't bother me that women abort. It actually makes me feel superior and thankful that I am better than they are. I am glad I have an internal sense of morality and do not require religious or liberal fallacies to recognize right and wrong. Almost everyone in the world suffers from one of those great mindf***s. And I get to call things like I see them.

Maybe you see things differently, but it is a remarkable coincidence to me that virtually all of you, despite the infinity of possible combinations, all line up with either liberal or some religion on every point considered major in modern politics.

 

Prove both allegations please, otherwise they are nothing more than your usual erroneous assumptions.

You are wrong, yet again, on what is published in text books, each states board of education selects the text books to be used in the schools in their districts, even to the extent of insisting changes be made to text books prior to them being added to their approved lists.

 

I see you evaded the question .. let me put it another way, tell me does any person who is injured, even if that injury was due to them taking a risk, refused medical treatment?

 

I seen a program about it on TV a few years ago. Like 60 Minutes or something.

 

You can only satisfy your own personal moral standards for yourself by living up to those standards. Contrary to what you might think, speaking out against something, "enlightening" others, does nothing to satisfy your moral standard. Feeling superior and thankful that you are superior is prideful and self-righteous---SINS, both of them. You get to call things like you see them for yourself only, nobody else has to listen to your blowhard pontificating.

You have no idea how we line up on religion or political points. People do not fit neatly into boxes for your classifications.

 

Isn't it? Seems true, honest intellectual discourse is not in their best interest!

 

Abortion is legal for one reason, and one reason only, it is acceptable to end a life. We as humans do it all the time. We end life to for punishment, self defense, protection of a country (as in war), and of corse ideological reasons. The question of abortion is a question of innocence. What has a baby done to have its life taken. And, yes, I call it a baby. Removing culpability by calling it a scientific term like zygote or fetus is not truth. I live in the realm of reality and I suggest everyone join me there. I have heard all kinds of acceptable reasons to end a baby's life. If the mothers life is in danger, if the baby is from a rape, if the baby is from incest at an early age, if the baby is malformed... etc... etc. You get my point. So, the innocence is forgotten when it concerns certain situations. Such is the same for other reasoning, when ending a life.

Now, there is a separate issue and that is the rights of the mother. Should she be forced into the pain of labor and all the other issues that come with pregnancy? The obvious answer is no. Now we are at an impass between an innocent baby and the mothers rights. Fact is the solution is an emotional one. When do we recognize the baby's right to live over the mothers rights? The answer is simple, when the baby can feel pain, emotional or otherwise. The mother and baby are on equal footing. Thus, the baby's rights trump the mothers. I haven't researched when the baby can feel pain or if science has even come to a determination.

Those are my thoughts on the matter. And, my conclusion is because of logic there will always be abortions.

 

IF you lived in the realm of reality you'd call a zygote a zygote, a fetus a fetus, a baby a baby and not call a tire a taxi......which is what you do when you call a fetus a baby.


The solution to abortion is not an emotional one. Some want to use emotions instead of facts, science, and law by calling a fetus a baby but that emotional blather won't change facts, science or law..

 

Don't be too harsh they have not even reached the rinse cycle yet, it will come.