The final days of Iran's tyrants

I doubt they may listen, I'm still expecting the hammer to fall at any time, when the military starts clearing the protestors.

 

Texan Republic. I can see I left out "The deal is a path for Iran developing nukes.". This was a mistake. Things got in the wrong place. It certainly was important to my point that the deal is about stopping Iran having nukes so if you want that the deal would be the place to stay.

 

Riiiight, but letting iran and its terrorist proxies walk all over and make wars across the mideast, displacing for instance ten million people in syria and murdering one million, is not a rational alternative (unless you're in idiot trash like obama who would have sacrificed his daughters for the lunatic nuclear "deal").

Sure, that's a much "better" option.

The time to end iran's imperialism and hegemony has arrived; while the despicable europeans and their media allies might be willing to bend over like whores for khameini's filthy coins, the sane part of the region and world are not.

 

Go to nearly any country in the world and you’ll find thousands out of millions that would like to topple the government, even here in America. There’s no way of knowing whether or not the thousands of protesters in Iran speak for 80 million citizens. We do know that Wesley Clark presented a pentagon paper months after 9/11 that listed 7 countries that were listed for regime change.

Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, Yemen, Somalia and Sudan. (Interestingly enough, the same countries were on Trumps original immigration ban) looks like Russia thwarted attempts at Syria, and with the Sudanese recent cries for help from Russia, perhaps they’ll thwart that attempt too. The jury is still out on Yemen, and the Trump administration is doing their best with Iran, tying them to arms supplier in Yemen, decertifying them on the nuclear deal despite the fact that the UN, our own State Department, and the other signatories of the Iran nuclear deal all say that Iran is compliant. And now we’re supporting a few thousand protesters in Iran that want regime change.

 

Regime change. No ones worried about nukes or we wouldn’t decertify a deal that’s working.

 

Not until Trump destroys the nuclear agreement with Iran. Then America will have two enemies with nuclear weapons and Trump can double his moronic name calling.

 

Someone smart gets it.

===========================

I wonder what kind of moral character one must be completely lacking to be a water carrying, khameini boot licker; they'd have to be a seriously mentally unstable person.

 

But the great negotiator can get a better deal. Just look at the awesome results in North Korea and the TPP.

 

It was not much of a deal

After 10 years iran can go nuclearcwiyh the full blessing of obsma, russia and the EU

And we were kinda hoping civilization would last longer than that

 

Eventually, all those dominoes will fall, I don't think one needs Wesley Clark to state that.
Syria is a pyhrric victory for Putinka, he's interested in keeping Assad there at all costs, the 1 million dead, 10-12 million displaced hardly matters to the kremlin.

 

Ten years gives you time to sort the problems. Nukes tomorrow is the end.

 

Delete

 

Uhhh, they already have them, they enriched thousands of KGs of uranium, some to weapons grade. They have gone 25.9 miles of the marathon, all the hard work is done.

 

The people of iran, anyone but the regime or its supporters, lackeys or apologists, wherever they may be found.

 

Lol, he withdrew from TPP, and backed out on North Korean diplomacy, Russia, the country with good relations with both Koreas brought the two to the table. The TIC will continue tweeting obscenities toward North Korea.

 

So you are a nuclear scientist?

 

Well, you can’t claim that Clark was projecting some conspiracy theory. It’s actually been happening, and if you’d listen to his interview, it was a Pentagon policy paper , shrug.

And....looks like Russia’s not allowing Syria to fall, and may not allow Sudan to fall.

 

10 years sounds like a long time but its really not

 

Do we need to go through this crap in every thread? I already stated, as others have 1,000 times - that iran's military sites are off limits, so THEY CANNOT BE INSPECTED.

So NO ONE, NOT THE UN, NOT THE FRENCH, NOT THE MARTIANS, can claim with any certainty that iran has not transferred it work to another location, called it a "military" site, and prevented any inspections.

So then why do so many arab muslims have an issue with zionism? Why is arab muslim nationalism acceptable, but zionism is "racism" according to them?

Uhm, the 50 MM slaughtered in WW2 might disagree with you there.

 

Correct. I was being sarcastic.

 

For Christ sakes stop fretting many countries have nukes and to date only one has ever used them.

 

A lot can be done in ten years if there is the will. Sounds a lot better than just creating what you fear.

 

Kim will talk untill he has the nukes and ICBMs

 

Iran is an islamic wacko country

There is no pressing nned fot nukes except for offensive purposes

 

Do you?

With iran's massive oil reserves? I think you forgot which persona to use this week, you're a KSA supporter, not an iran supporter.