Stay away from certain posters and you're relatively safe from selective filtering. You never know sometimes. Sometimes it's easy to ascertain. Nah..I didn't lose.
Of course he would have. Trayvon was a wanna be thug. Anyone who walks into a convenience store with his hoodie up is either a thug or wanna be thug.
When did I ever deny he wanted to be a ploiceman? AGAIN I ask, Martin wanted to be a gangster, which is more admirable?
When did I ever say you denied it? Here is where I said he wanted to be a cop, and you responded with a smart assessed remark about how my posts are "manure laden" and I should learn the facts: And now in *this* thread, you admit the same "manure laden" fact you claimed I should be "embarrased" about because I need to "learn the facts": LOL. Yep, I sure should be embarrassed for my "manure laden post" saying Zimmerman wanted to be a cop. Depends on the motive, but generally being a cop. Some guys wanna be cops so they can shoot "(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s". If Martin unnecessarily shot and killed Zuckerman, what Martin wanted to be that might be an issue.
I stand by my assertion that you need to learn the facts and the manure laden part is self evident! Generalizations are generally wrought with peril and typically utilized to demonize a group of people by ignorant other people.
LMAO! Tell us again how my claim that Zimmerman wanted to be a cop was "manure laden" No doubt. Do you have a relevant point to make?
it's all circumstantial not his neighborhood recent burglaries in that area he was caught with women's jewelry and had no plausible explanation was a vandal out on a school night lurking instead of studying it all adds up, he was a rotten egg
And how much of that did Zimm know the night he shot him to death? BTW - you forgot to mention "he was black". Again, what evidence is there TM was casing homes the night he died?
The Jury got it right! Martin was committing a felony against Zimmerman when shot. That's all you really need to know.
he didn't get killed for casing homes, so if he was or not is not the issue. Was Trayvon committing a felony assault and battery on Zimmerman when Zimmerman shot him is the question you need to ask. The jury thought so. NOT GUILTY We can argue all day if Zimmerman should have confronted. But confronting, even if he was completely wrong, is not illegal and does not give Trayvon the right to physically attack Zimmerman.
It does if Zimmerman exposed or brandished his gun. IMO this is evident during his unbelievable statements about "reaching for his phone" at the beginning of the confrontatin.
Zimmerman is not guilty because we have firsthand testimony from Witness # 6 who testified as to actually seeing Trayvon as the one on top { with an obvious upper hand beating down on Zimmerman laying on his back }. We have Dee Dee admitting that indeed her boyfriend { Trayvon } was Obsessed with the Community Watch guy who was watching him.Trayvon was eyeballing George as much as George eyeballing him.We have George callin 9-1-1 and admitting this hooded guy was watching him.Therefore Trayvon was in fact,Profiling George.George didn't get on his back with a bloody face scraped back of the head for no reason.Zimmerman's head got that way due to Trayvon. There is no question George was fighting for his life { self-defense claim }. The sin occurred when hack Prosecutor with a history of being aggressive and controlling or Angela Corey,pulled stunts and falsely submitted a deposition to a Judge asking for a charge instead of empaneling a Grand Jury. Professor Alan Dershovitz was spot-on.No way did Prosecutor Corey have the needed cause to level a charge of 2nd degree murder.Especially when she broke precedent by failing to make any mention of injuries to the Defendant or Zimmerman.
