Let me sum this up from a racial realist's point of view. Black gangster/criminal is tracked by police in the back of a Tottenham taxi cab. The police must know he's packing as they're heavily armed. They stop the cab and shots are fired resulting in the death of black gangster/criminal. Family is devastated and probably rightly so... even though they couldn't have cared much about black gangster/criminal to let him be a gangster/criminal and not raise him properly. Anyway, family of black gangster/criminal "peacefully" protest outside police station and are join by many uppity blacks who are hell-bent on starting trouble. Uppity black mob don't get the answers they want so they predictably riot like they do all the time where ever there's a significant black population. A carpet store built in the 1930s that survived World War II and has been standing long before blacks were even in London is fire bombed and burned to the ground... not before it's looted. Now uppity blacks are looting, rioting, home invading, robbing and setting fire to buildings/cars all over London. London, a once-beautiful city before multi-culturalism was FORCED upon it is completely devastated and has come to a complete standstill. White, anti-racist, lemmings try to justify this by saying "oh, but White people are involved too" failing to understand that the only Whites involved are "wiggers" who are trying to emulate blacks and black culture and make up around 10% of the rioting mob. Every single borough of London hit by the riots is a majority black borough. No majority White boroughs of London are effected. Even poor White boroughs like Bermondsey, Uxbridge, Welling, Eltham, Bexleyheath, Wimbledon or Richmond. Riots wouldn't be happening in London and innocent people wouldn't be left homeless today if it wasn't for blacks being in London in the first place and that is a bonafide FACT. It later emerges that black gangster/criminal was carrying a blank-firing handgun converted to fire live bullets typically carried by drug dealers, but he didn't fire at the cops first. So uppity black mob are outraged by this, completely ignoring that a dangerous gangster/criminal is off our streets for good. Anyone would think these blacks are pro-crime. Tell me and explain in detail where I went wrong?
Why do blacks insist on defending gun-toting black criminals who the police try to rid the streets of? [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G68UmLMO7CY"]‪SFPD Ruthlessly Shoots and Kills Unarmed 19yr old Man over $2 Bus Fare‬‏ - YouTube[/ame] [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lp75oaQQJ04"]‪Kenneth Harding SFPD Shooting - He Was Armed‬‏ - YouTube[/ame] Anyone would think they're pro-crime. No other race acts in this manner. I can't think of any Whites or Asians violently protesting about a gangster shot by police.
Any adults feel like debating? I know it's a long-shot on this forum full of anti-racist child-brains.
Why do you bother inviting opposite points of view when all you'll do is just stick your fingers in your ears and repeat to yourself IT'S THE BLACKS!!! IT'S ALL THEIR FAULT! ad infintum?
Meat, you might not like what he has to say, but it he still allowed to say it unless an admin or moderator says otherwise, so please enough with the trolling.
Not necssarily. Let's debate. Tell me where I went wrong and we'll discuss it like adults. Is it not plausible that it is all their fault? You think they're incapable of causing problems on this huge a scale? They're experienced in creating riots like this over police shooting their criminals. From the L.A. riots to Cleveland to Cincinnati to Brixton to Tottenham in 1985 and even Paris, France.
Well for one, Lambeth Borough is something like 2/3rds white and it's been hit twice during these riots (2001 data). Where do you get your information?
I won't debate with you. I'll agree with you. From the day I was born until 62 years later, I lived in London and experience much of what you write. Even to the last day when we emigrated to Canada and when my wife was carrying a final suitcase and her handbag when approaching the Underground, she was threatened by a black person but being of Quebec origin and having learned to box by her 5 brothers, she merely said "Come on, take me out if you have the balls" and after a further verbal threat and cuss he ran. P.S. To those whose first thought is to label me a racist, I already admitted it about 7000 posts back, because everyone is a racist whether white, black or green, even if they are not prepared to admit it, even to themselves.
What happened in Lambeth Borough? A smashed window or two? I've lived in London, UK. Black crime was an epidemic at the time, it must be far worse now. They set up a special police unit to deal with all the black gun crime Operation Trident. Why people defend blacks is beyond me... the devastation and destruction they've caused and continue to cause all over the world is astronomical. Thank you for being brave enough to give a realistic opinion.
May I add: As these muslims have a tendency to create gangs and beat up and rob innocent people in the UK, France, Canada, and those gangs do surely multiply in the USA too so that no police force is big enough to control the violent acts such gangs do!!!
Ive already completly demolished your arguments in a number of threads and your response is to descend to insult and post strawmen. You are the last person who should be accusing other posters of not engaging in rational debate. In short, you are a poor loser.
OK. Well for a start, there, but lets focus on the actual "facts".. London is completely fine today. As it was yesterday. I walked around Brixton the morning after it's riot and it was functioning as normal, with the markets still open, Electric Avenue still rocking and everyone simply milling around annoyed that they couldn't get into Maccy D's....Standstill is a ridiculous and complete over exaggeration. We're all alright here. Stats for this figure? Or have you just pulled it out of your arse? Aaahh good. Some meat. I live in Lambeth. My borough was hit twice over two nights. Three times if you include Clapham Junction, which is on the border of Lambeth, with most of Clapham inside, but Junction just out. Lambeth has a 63% majority white population. http://www.londoncouncils.gov.uk/services/lept/boroughmap/lambeth/ Source above (I like sources you see, they prove things) Virtually every borough in London is a majority white borough. Considering "blacks" number around 10% of the population, 13 if you include mix raced (source again, they're useful for arguments - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnic_groups_in_London) they'd be doing extraordinarily well to be the majority population in ANY borough. No it isn't. You need sources for those. Presumably your "homeless" line refers to the good old racist mantra of "they too kourrr jooobbs" but that would be failing to take into account the 70,000 jobs in London created by black business. (source http://www.blackeconomics.co.uk/london_blackbusinesses.htm) and the wealth of cultural, musical and culinary benefits it's brought... If you hate immigrants so much, I reckon you should move somewhere where there aren't any (I'm assuming you won't get the irony of that) we'd all be so much better off if you did..
I've no idea what the hell you're talking about. Are you high? You're the resident punching bag around here. You sit there in your all-White Australian community and haven't a clue about what real multi-culturalism is all about. In short, you're ignorant, like most anti-racist *******s. I prefer to debate with people who have experienced racial issues, multi-culturalism and black crime first hand, but if you'd care to point out the mistakes in the OP, I'm willing to listen.
Funniest, most ignorant post of the evening. Well done. You've demonstrated your complete lack of knowledge about Australia. This will be hard to top.
Christ alive. And you wonder why people have an oft-low opinion of Americans. All white Australian community? puhlease
