The Nazi Party was not Right-Wing

Hitler commissioned the building and production of the Volkswagon. The translation is peoples car. It was one car for the masses designed by the government. If that is not socialism what is.

 

Science is apolitical. Or should be. But you know how that goes with the left. They start with prophesy of global warming and go from there and make it full blown dogma. Then they claim it as an ideology as they bad mout the pharmaceutical companies, aerospace trying to leave union states, deep see drilling people etc... You know useful science like the koch brothers use to make people's lives better like geology not enviro social science.

So to sum up your other arguments you think we should expand military science? What do you think about the democrat programs to stop missile shields? Opposition to nuclear energy?

 

And he stole some of the cash for it for his own pet projects Pure socialism!

 

If someone "gather(s) arms to fight against the government troops" who are infringing on Individual Liberty and violating the Constitution, they are Patriots, Patriots fighting against Traitors! The whisky tax is a sin tax and probably unconstitutional as it taxes choice. Would a tax on liberals and LEFTISTS be constitutional? "

 

Yes it would be constitutional. Lefterism kills more people then all the plagues combined.

 

You just proved me to be correct. If you say the Left means "equality," but that means keeping many down to the lowest level so all can be equal by using the coercive FORCE of government. You say the right means "inequality" which is true as the rights does not seek to make all equal through the FORCE of government, just give everyone an equal chance that will not guarantee equal outcomes, then YOU say I am confused and that I redifgn terms. No, I understand things quite will.

 

The Nazis loved the Communists and Socialists so much they invaded the USSR?

 

As far as I can tell there was no difference between the Nazis and Lenin/Stalin's Communists.

 

An incredibly stupid, historically inaccurate distortion, courtesy of pop culture historical revisionists like Jonah Goldberg.

 

Both relied on a repressive police state to enforce their socialist ideas.

Hitler had the Gestapo.
Stalin had the NKVD.
Hitler had death camps.
Stalin had the gulag.

Where's the difference?

 

It's real shame that so many Americans are evidently completely ignorant of history.

 

It's so good to know that I'm not the only one you insult in that fashion. Okay, so what was incorrect about his stating the similarities between Hitler/Stalin's secretive form of despotic government? What made their governments different? What are we so ignorant about?

 

You mean to tell us that Hitler did not have a Gestapo or Auschwitz?

You mean to tell us Stalin did not have the NKVD and the gulag?

 

Sometimes BROTHERS see themselves as "mortal enem...(ies)" but are still HIGHLY related such has the two LEFTISTS to which you were referring...

 

But wait, Progressive Marxists continue to forget (convieniently) that Hitler made a deal with Stalin to invade Poland and split it up.

 

The only thing demonstrated by all the ignorant people on this thread is that extremists of left and right use the same tactics.

- - - Updated - - -

No doubt you find these kind of superficial equivalencies to be compelling.

 

I find guys with guns to be quite compelling.

Why don't you enlighten the forum as to how the Gestapo was different from the KGB?

Why don't you expound on the deep differences between the Kolya River mining camps and Treblinka?

 

But wait Conservative Neocons forget one of the axioms of conflict is to always try to fight your war on someone else's territory. Both sides wanted a buffer state. But then Necons forget that the US entered a formal alliance with the Soviet Union during the same war. So I guess that means the US is a communist state.

Dont let reality get in the way of your revision of history

 

Well that certainly is some deep, thoughtful analysis on this question.

 

"Well that certainly is some deep, thoughtful analysis on this question."

Taxcutter says:
Moreso than any claim that they were functionally different.

 

You have yet to make anything like a compelling argument about anything on this thread. Your shallow parallels are completely meaningless because you only attempt to define the left, while you apparently have no idea what defines the right.

 

So that's why after I destroyed your name argument you decided to elaborate on your other points. Thereby as the person making the claim, could allow the converation to go on.

 

You know, something most people tend to learn in early on in life is that you can't call people ignorant without actually proving said ignorance. It makes you look....ignorant(shocking!)

And oh yes, generalizations between the two. Only about 50+ billion people killed between the two, generalizations, nothing more move along .

 

In the absence of any evidence of intelligence it's logical to assume ignorance.

 

I give up, your beyond pitiful