Thoughts?

Yeah, that's fine--why are we there?

 

I told you already - the most likely reason to destabilize the region to prevent competing interests from building an energy corridor to the new silk road.

Occam's razor.

Why do you think we armed and funded a terrorist proxy army in Syria ? If you think it was because "Assad is a bad guy" - this is just as ridiculous as the "getting rid of a safe haven for terrorists" rational in Afghanistan.

Assad blocked a pipeline that would have gone through Syria. .. go figure.

 

Thereis, quite sadly, only one way there will ever be peace in that place, and no one is willing to eat the bad press for doing it.

 

It is not funny, there is no evidence that Third Law of Mechanics has been changed on 9/11/2001.
Newton's laws has nothing to do with conspiracy theories.

 

I thought you were kidding. There's no need to build pipelines across Asia. The oil and natural gas China needs are elsewhere or can be sent by tanker.

You need to check your facts on where the oil and gas are located.

Syria is the dividing line between Sunni and Shia powers. As well, we're protecting the Sunnis and a significant portion of the world's oil supply.

Assad is Alawite Shia is a country that's 75% Sunni. Iraq and Iran are majority Shia. We've been trying to draw the line in Syria.

 

I am willing to bet that you not able to explain Newton's 3rd law and how it relates to 9/11 entirely in your own words.

I am also willing to bet that you know nothing at all about the various types of mechanical energy involved in 9/11.

On second thoughts just forget about it because all of the absurd and ludicrous 9/11 conspiracy bovine excrement stems have a woeful lack of this subject matter knowledge.

 

It is not my job. You are the one who spent trillions of dollars for bogus wars. You are then one who should present the result of scientific experiments that would support official explanation of events .
So far there are NONE.